Mitigation Strategy: Enforce WSS (WebSocket Secure)
Here's a refined list of mitigation strategies that directly involve the SocketRocket library, focusing on its configuration and usage to enhance security.
-
Description:
- Code Review: Inspect all instances where
SRWebSocket
is initialized. - URL Verification: Ensure that the WebSocket URL passed to
SRWebSocket
constructor always starts withwss://
instead ofws://
. - Configuration Enforcement: If using configuration files or environment variables for WebSocket URLs, strictly enforce that only
wss://
URLs are permitted forSRWebSocket
initialization. - Testing: Conduct integration tests to verify that
SRWebSocket
connections are established using WSS and that data is encrypted during transmission.
- Code Review: Inspect all instances where
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Eavesdropping (High Severity): Unencrypted
ws://
connections transmit data in plaintext, allowing attackers to intercept and read sensitive information communicated viaSRWebSocket
. - Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (High Severity): Without encryption, attackers can intercept and modify communication between the client and server using
SRWebSocket
, potentially injecting malicious data or stealing credentials.
- Eavesdropping (High Severity): Unencrypted
-
Impact:
- Eavesdropping: High reduction - WSS encryption, enforced through
SRWebSocket
, makes eavesdropping extremely difficult. - Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: High reduction - WSS, when used with
SRWebSocket
, provides authentication and encryption, significantly hindering man-in-the-middle attacks.
- Eavesdropping: High reduction - WSS encryption, enforced through
-
Currently Implemented:
- Implemented in the application's network layer where
SRWebSocket
connections are established. URLs are configured to usewss://
in production environments forSRWebSocket
.
- Implemented in the application's network layer where
-
Missing Implementation:
- No missing implementation currently for production
SRWebSocket
usage. However, ensure development and testing environments also default towss://
or have clear documentation to avoid accidentalws://
usage in production withSRWebSocket
.
- No missing implementation currently for production
Mitigation Strategy: Implement Certificate Pinning
-
Description:
- Certificate/Public Key Extraction: Obtain the server's TLS/SSL certificate or its public key used for WSS connections with
SRWebSocket
. - Pinning Implementation within
SRWebSocketDelegate
: Integrate certificate pinning within the application's network layer, specifically using theSRWebSocketDelegate
methods. This involves:- Bundling the server's certificate or public key within the application.
- Implementing custom certificate validation in
SRWebSocketDelegate
methods likewebSocket:didReceiveAuthenticationChallenge:
. - Comparing the server's presented certificate against the pinned certificate or public key within the delegate.
- Rejecting the
SRWebSocket
connection in the delegate if the certificate does not match the pinned value.
- Pin Rotation Strategy: Establish a process for rotating pinned certificates or public keys used by
SRWebSocket
when server certificates are updated. This might involve application updates or remote configuration updates. - Testing: Thoroughly test the pinning implementation for
SRWebSocket
by attempting connections with valid and invalid certificates (e.g., using a self-signed certificate or a certificate from a different domain) and verifying the delegate's behavior.
- Certificate/Public Key Extraction: Obtain the server's TLS/SSL certificate or its public key used for WSS connections with
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Man-in-the-Middle Attacks via Compromised CAs (High Severity): If a Certificate Authority (CA) is compromised, attackers could issue fraudulent certificates for your domain. Certificate pinning within
SRWebSocketDelegate
prevents reliance solely on CAs and mitigates this risk for WebSocket connections.
- Man-in-the-Middle Attacks via Compromised CAs (High Severity): If a Certificate Authority (CA) is compromised, attackers could issue fraudulent certificates for your domain. Certificate pinning within
-
Impact:
- Man-in-the-Middle Attacks via Compromised CAs: High reduction - Pinning within
SRWebSocketDelegate
ensures that even if a CA is compromised,SRWebSocket
connections to your server are still protected as only the pinned certificate is trusted.
- Man-in-the-Middle Attacks via Compromised CAs: High reduction - Pinning within
-
Currently Implemented:
- Not currently implemented for
SRWebSocket
. Standard system certificate validation is used forSRWebSocket
connections.
- Not currently implemented for
-
Missing Implementation:
- Certificate pinning is missing in the network layer for
SRWebSocket
connections. Implementation is needed within theSRWebSocketDelegate
methods, specificallywebSocket:didReceiveAuthenticationChallenge:
, to perform custom certificate validation.
- Certificate pinning is missing in the network layer for
Mitigation Strategy: Implement Message Size Limits
-
Description:
- SocketRocket Configuration (if available): Explore
SRWebSocket
configuration options to set a maximum allowed message size directly within the library's settings. If direct configuration is limited, consider implementing size checks within theSRWebSocketDelegate
. - Delegate-Based Size Checks: If direct configuration is insufficient, implement message size checks within the
SRWebSocketDelegate
methodwebSocket:didReceiveMessage:
. Before processing the message, check its size against a defined limit. - Define Reasonable Limits: Determine appropriate message size limits for
SRWebSocket
based on the application's expected data volume and resource constraints. Consider both incoming and outgoing message sizes handled bySRWebSocket
. - Error Handling in Delegate: Implement error handling in
SRWebSocketDelegate
methods to gracefully handle situations where messages exceed the configured size limit. Log errors and potentially close theSRWebSocket
connection if necessary.
- SocketRocket Configuration (if available): Explore
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) via Large Messages (Medium to High Severity): Attackers can send excessively large WebSocket messages through
SRWebSocket
to consume server and client resources (memory, bandwidth, processing power), potentially leading to denial of service.
- Denial of Service (DoS) via Large Messages (Medium to High Severity): Attackers can send excessively large WebSocket messages through
-
Impact:
- Denial of Service (DoS) via Large Messages: Medium to High reduction - Limiting message sizes for
SRWebSocket
prevents attackers from easily overwhelming the application with oversized messages sent via WebSocket. The impact depends on how effectively the limits are enforced withinSRWebSocket
usage and the application's resource capacity.
- Denial of Service (DoS) via Large Messages: Medium to High reduction - Limiting message sizes for
-
Currently Implemented:
- No explicit message size limits are currently configured for
SRWebSocket
usage.
- No explicit message size limits are currently configured for
-
Missing Implementation:
- Message size limits need to be implemented for
SRWebSocket
. Explore direct configuration options first. If not sufficient, implement size checks within theSRWebSocketDelegate
methodwebSocket:didReceiveMessage:
. Reasonable limits should be determined based on application requirements and resource constraints forSRWebSocket
communication.
- Message size limits need to be implemented for
Mitigation Strategy: Handle Unexpected/Malformed Messages Gracefully
- Description:
- Error Handling in
SRWebSocketDelegate
Methods: Implement comprehensive error handling withinSRWebSocketDelegate
methods, particularly inwebSocket:didReceiveMessage:
which processes incoming messages fromSRWebSocket
. - Exception Handling within Delegate: Use try-catch blocks or similar mechanisms within
SRWebSocketDelegate
methods to handle potential exceptions during message processing (e.g., JSON parsing errors, data validation errors) of messages received viaSRWebSocket
. - Logging within Delegate: Log errors and details about unexpected or malformed messages received by
SRWebSocket
within theSRWebSocketDelegate
methods for debugging and security monitoring purposes. Include relevant information like message content (if safe to log), error type, and timestamp. - Graceful Degradation based on
SRWebSocket
state: Design the application to gracefully handle situations where message processing fromSRWebSocket
fails. Avoid crashing or exposing sensitive information. Handle errors within theSRWebSocketDelegate
and consider strategies like:- Ignoring the malformed message from
SRWebSocket
and continuing operation. - Requesting re-transmission of the message via
SRWebSocket
(if applicable protocol).
- Ignoring the malformed message from
- Error Handling in