Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
28 lines (23 loc) · 3.59 KB

File metadata and controls

28 lines (23 loc) · 3.59 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for ibireme/yykit

  • Description: Attackers craft malicious JSON or other data formats that, when deserialized by YYModel, exploit vulnerabilities to achieve unexpected code execution, data leaks, or denial of service.
  • YYKit Contribution: YYModel provides the core deserialization functionality, making it the direct entry point for this attack. Its reliance on reflection and key-value coding increases the potential for vulnerabilities if not used carefully.
  • Example: An attacker sends a JSON payload containing a class name that is not whitelisted but has a vulnerable init method or a method that conforms to a protocol expected by the application. When YYModel attempts to create an instance of this class, the vulnerable code is executed.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Data Breach, Application Crash, Denial of Service.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Mandatory Class Whitelisting: Always use modelSetClassWhitelist to explicitly define the only allowed classes for deserialization. This is the primary defense. Do not rely on blacklisting alone.
    • Strict Input Validation: Validate all data before and after deserialization. Use a schema validation library (e.g., JSON Schema) if possible. Check for expected data types, ranges, and lengths.
    • Limit Data Size: Restrict the size of the input data to prevent excessive memory consumption.
    • Avoid Deserializing Complex, Nested Structures from Untrusted Sources: If possible, simplify the data format or use a more secure parsing method for untrusted data.
  • Description: Attackers provide maliciously crafted image files (JPEG, PNG, GIF, WebP, etc.) that exploit vulnerabilities in the underlying image decoding libraries (ImageIO, etc.) used by YYImage and YYWebImage.
  • YYKit Contribution: YYImage and YYWebImage handle image loading, decoding, and caching, making them the pathway for these exploits. While the vulnerabilities are in the system frameworks, YYKit facilitates their exploitation.
  • Example: An attacker uploads a specially crafted PNG file to a profile picture feature. This PNG contains malformed data that triggers a buffer overflow in the ImageIO framework when YYImage attempts to decode it, leading to code execution.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Application Crash, Denial of Service.
  • Risk Severity: High (Potentially Critical, depending on the specific vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep iOS Updated: This is the most crucial mitigation. Image decoding vulnerabilities are frequently patched in iOS updates. Ensure users are running supported iOS versions.
    • Limit Image Dimensions and Size: Enforce strict limits on the maximum width, height, and file size of images processed by the application. This mitigates denial-of-service attacks and can reduce the likelihood of triggering certain vulnerabilities.
    • Avoid Untrusted Image Sources: If possible, restrict image downloads to trusted sources (e.g., your own servers).
    • Server-Side Image Processing (If Feasible): Consider performing image resizing and validation on a trusted server before sending the image to the client. This reduces the attack surface on the client device.