Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
53 lines (46 loc) · 7.58 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

53 lines (46 loc) · 7.58 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for ibireme/yytext

Mitigation Strategy: Input Length Limits for yytext Processing

  • Mitigation Strategy: Input Length Limits for yytext Processing
  • Description:
    • Step 1: Analyze how yytext is used in the application to determine the maximum acceptable text length it should process efficiently and securely. Consider memory usage and processing time limits within yytext's context.
    • Step 2: Implement length checks immediately before passing text data to yytext functions. This check should be specific to the input intended for yytext.
    • Step 3: If the input text exceeds the determined length limit, prevent it from being processed by yytext. Handle this situation gracefully, for example, by truncating the text for yytext processing (if acceptable for application logic) or rejecting the input and logging the event.
    • Step 4: Ensure this length limiting is applied consistently at all points in the code where yytext is invoked to process external or user-provided text.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Buffer Overflow in yytext (High Severity): If yytext has internal vulnerabilities related to handling extremely long strings, limiting input length directly prevents exploitation by ensuring yytext never receives excessively long inputs.
    • Denial of Service via yytext (Medium Severity): Prevent attackers from overloading yytext with extremely long inputs that could cause it to consume excessive resources (CPU, memory) and lead to a denial of service.
  • Impact:
    • Buffer Overflow in yytext: Significantly reduces the risk of buffer overflows within yytext itself by controlling the size of input it processes.
    • Denial of Service via yytext: Partially reduces the risk of DoS attacks targeting yytext's resource consumption.
  • Currently Implemented: No. Length limits are not specifically implemented before calling yytext functions in the current codebase. General input length limits might exist at a higher application level, but not tailored for yytext's processing.
  • Missing Implementation: Length validation needs to be implemented directly before each call to yytext processing functions, ensuring that the text passed to yytext is within safe and manageable limits. This should be added in modules that utilize yytext for text layout and rendering.

Mitigation Strategy: Character Set Restrictions and Validation for yytext Input

  • Mitigation Strategy: Character Set Restrictions and Validation for yytext Input
  • Description:
    • Step 1: Define the precise character set that yytext is expected to handle correctly and securely. Refer to yytext's documentation or source code if available to understand its character encoding and character handling limitations.
    • Step 2: Implement character validation immediately before passing text to yytext. This validation should specifically check if all characters in the input are within the defined allowed set for yytext.
    • Step 3: If invalid characters are detected (characters outside the allowed set for yytext), either reject the input for yytext processing or sanitize it by removing or replacing the invalid characters before passing it to yytext. The chosen approach depends on the application's requirements.
    • Step 4: Ensure this character validation is applied consistently at all points where text is prepared for processing by yytext.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unexpected Behavior in yytext (Low to Medium Severity): If yytext is not designed to handle certain characters or character encodings, providing such input could lead to unexpected rendering errors, crashes, or other unpredictable behavior within yytext.
    • Potential Exploits related to Character Handling in yytext (Severity Varies - potentially Medium): In rare cases, vulnerabilities might exist in how yytext handles specific character sequences or encodings. Restricting the character set reduces the attack surface by limiting the types of characters processed by yytext.
  • Impact:
    • Unexpected Behavior in yytext: Reduces the risk of unexpected behavior and errors within yytext caused by unsupported characters.
    • Potential Exploits related to Character Handling in yytext: Partially reduces the risk of character-handling related exploits within yytext by limiting the input character space.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic encoding checks might be present at a higher level, but specific character set validation tailored for yytext's requirements is not implemented directly before yytext calls.
  • Missing Implementation: Character set validation, aligned with yytext's expected input, needs to be implemented right before text is passed to yytext functions. This validation should ensure that only characters known to be safely and correctly handled by yytext are processed.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits (Timeouts) for yytext Operations

  • Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits (Timeouts) for yytext Operations
  • Description:
    • Step 1: Analyze the typical processing time for yytext operations in normal application usage. Establish a reasonable timeout threshold that is slightly longer than the expected maximum processing time for legitimate inputs.
    • Step 2: Implement timeouts around calls to yytext functions. Use mechanisms provided by the programming language or operating system to set time limits for these operations.
    • Step 3: If a yytext operation exceeds the timeout, terminate the operation gracefully. Handle the timeout event appropriately, for example, by logging an error, returning a default rendering result, or informing the user of a processing issue.
    • Step 4: Monitor timeout occurrences. Frequent timeouts might indicate potential DoS attempts or performance issues related to yytext usage.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Denial of Service via yytext (Medium to High Severity): Prevent attackers from crafting inputs that cause yytext to enter long-running processing loops or become unresponsive, leading to DoS. Timeouts limit the duration of any single yytext operation.
    • Algorithmic Complexity Exploits in yytext (Medium Severity): If yytext has algorithmic vulnerabilities that can be triggered by specific inputs to cause very slow processing, timeouts limit the impact of such exploits by preventing operations from running indefinitely.
  • Impact:
    • Denial of Service via yytext: Partially reduces the risk of DoS attacks targeting yytext by preventing resource exhaustion from long-running operations.
    • Algorithmic Complexity Exploits in yytext: Partially reduces the impact of algorithmic complexity exploits within yytext by enforcing time limits.
  • Currently Implemented: No. Timeouts are not currently implemented specifically for yytext operations. General application-level timeouts might exist for overall requests, but not for individual yytext processing calls.
  • Missing Implementation: Timeouts need to be implemented around all calls to yytext functions that process external or user-provided text. This will ensure that yytext operations are bounded in time and prevent potential resource exhaustion or DoS scenarios related to yytext processing.