Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
238 lines (215 loc) · 30.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

238 lines (215 loc) · 30.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for ifttt/jazzhands

Mitigation Strategy: Principle of Least Privilege for Jazzhands IAM Role/User

  • Mitigation Strategy: Principle of Least Privilege for Jazzhands IAM Role/User
  • Description:
    1. Identify Required Actions: Analyze Jazzhands configuration and workflows to determine the exact IAM actions it needs to perform (e.g., iam:CreateUser, iam:AttachRolePolicy).
    2. Identify Target Resources: Determine the specific IAM resources Jazzhands needs to manage (e.g., specific users, groups, roles, policies, potentially using resource ARNs with wildcards where necessary but minimized).
    3. Create Custom IAM Policy: Craft a custom IAM policy that explicitly grants only the identified actions on the identified resources. Avoid broad permissions like iam:* or Resource: "*".
    4. Attach Policy to Jazzhands Role/User: Attach this custom policy to the IAM role or user that Jazzhands uses for authentication.
    5. Regular Review and Adjustment: Periodically review Jazzhands' functionality and adjust the IAM policy as needed to maintain least privilege as requirements evolve.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Excessive Permissions (High Severity): If Jazzhands has overly broad permissions, a compromise of Jazzhands could lead to widespread unauthorized IAM modifications across the AWS account.
    • Lateral Movement (Medium Severity): Overly permissive roles could allow a compromised Jazzhands instance to access other AWS services or resources beyond IAM management.
  • Impact:
    • Excessive Permissions: High Impact - Significantly reduces the potential damage from a Jazzhands compromise by limiting its capabilities.
    • Lateral Movement: Medium Impact - Reduces the risk of lateral movement by restricting Jazzhands' access to only necessary IAM resources.
  • Currently Implemented: Project Specific - This is a fundamental security best practice and should be implemented wherever IAM roles are used. Check your Jazzhands deployment configuration and IAM role definitions.
  • Missing Implementation: Project Specific - If the Jazzhands IAM role uses broad policies like AdministratorAccess or policies with excessive wildcards, least privilege is missing. Review and refine the IAM policy attached to the Jazzhands role.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Credential Management for Jazzhands

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Credential Management for Jazzhands
  • Description:
    1. Eliminate Hardcoded Credentials: Remove any AWS access keys or secret keys directly embedded in Jazzhands code, configuration files, or environment variables intended for long-term storage.
    2. Choose Secure Method: Select a secure credential management method appropriate for your deployment environment:
      • IAM Roles (EC2/Containers/Lambda): If running on AWS, configure Jazzhands to assume an IAM role. This is the most secure method for AWS environments.
      • AWS Secrets Manager/HashiCorp Vault: Store credentials in a dedicated secrets management service. Configure Jazzhands to retrieve credentials programmatically at runtime using the service's SDK/API.
      • Environment Variables (with caution): If absolutely necessary to use environment variables, ensure the environment is highly secure, access is strictly controlled, and consider encryption at rest for the environment.
    3. Configure Jazzhands: Modify Jazzhands configuration to use the chosen secure credential management method. This typically involves removing direct credential configuration and setting up SDK/API calls or role assumption.
    4. Test and Verify: Thoroughly test the credential retrieval process to ensure Jazzhands can authenticate to AWS securely without hardcoded credentials.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Credential Exposure (High Severity): Hardcoded credentials are easily discovered in code repositories, configuration files, or logs, leading to unauthorized access to your AWS account.
    • Credential Theft (High Severity): If the system running Jazzhands is compromised, hardcoded credentials are readily available to attackers.
  • Impact:
    • Credential Exposure: High Impact - Eliminates the risk of accidental or intentional exposure of long-term credentials in code or configuration.
    • Credential Theft: High Impact - Significantly reduces the impact of system compromise by removing easily accessible, long-term credentials.
  • Currently Implemented: Project Specific - Check how Jazzhands is currently configured to authenticate to AWS. Look for hardcoded access keys or secret keys in configuration files or environment variables.
  • Missing Implementation: Project Specific - If hardcoded credentials are found, or if a less secure method like environment variables (without proper security measures) is used, secure credential management is missing. Implement IAM roles or a secrets management service.

Mitigation Strategy: Policy Review and Validation Before Deployment (Jazzhands Managed Policies)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Policy Review and Validation Before Deployment (Jazzhands Managed Policies)
  • Description:
    1. Establish Review Process: Define a mandatory review process for all IAM policies generated or modified by Jazzhands before they are applied to AWS. This should involve at least one security-conscious individual or team.
    2. Utilize Policy Validation Tools: Integrate policy validation tools into your deployment pipeline that processes Jazzhands outputs. Examples include:
      • AWS IAM Access Analyzer: Use Access Analyzer to identify policies that grant unintended access.
      • Custom Scripts (AWS SDK): Develop scripts using the AWS SDK to parse and analyze policies for syntax errors, overly permissive statements, or deviations from security best practices.
      • Policy Linter/Static Analysis Tools: Explore third-party tools that can perform static analysis of IAM policies.
    3. Human Review: Ensure human review of policies generated by Jazzhands, especially for complex or critical permissions. Reviewers should check for:
      • Alignment with the principle of least privilege.
      • Correct resource specifications and action definitions.
      • Absence of unintended wildcard usage.
      • Compliance with organizational security policies.
    4. Automated Enforcement (if possible): If feasible, automate policy validation and deployment processes to prevent deployment of policies generated by Jazzhands that fail validation checks.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Accidental Misconfiguration (Medium to High Severity): Human errors or logic flaws in Jazzhands policy generation can lead to overly permissive policies or unintended access grants.
    • Malicious Policy Injection (Medium Severity): If Jazzhands input is not properly sanitized, attackers could potentially inject malicious policy statements that are then processed and deployed by Jazzhands.
  • Impact:
    • Accidental Misconfiguration: High Impact - Significantly reduces the risk of deploying flawed policies generated by Jazzhands by introducing a multi-stage review and validation process.
    • Malicious Policy Injection: Medium Impact - Input validation (covered in another strategy) is the primary defense, but policy review acts as a secondary layer to catch any injected malicious policy components that bypass input validation within Jazzhands.
  • Currently Implemented: Project Specific - Determine if there is a formal policy review process in place before Jazzhands applies IAM changes. Check your deployment pipelines and workflows that handle Jazzhands outputs.
  • Missing Implementation: Project Specific - If policies generated by Jazzhands are applied automatically without review or validation, this mitigation is missing. Implement a mandatory review process and integrate policy validation tools into your workflow that processes Jazzhands outputs.

Mitigation Strategy: Policy Versioning and Rollback (Jazzhands Managed Policies)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Policy Versioning and Rollback (Jazzhands Managed Policies)
  • Description:
    1. Choose Version Control System: Select a version control system (e.g., Git) to store and track IAM policies managed by Jazzhands.
    2. Automate Policy Storage: Integrate Jazzhands (or the deployment pipeline using Jazzhands) with the version control system to automatically commit and version IAM policies whenever they are created or modified by Jazzhands.
    3. Implement Rollback Mechanism: Develop a process or script to retrieve previous policy versions from the version control system and re-apply them to AWS in case of errors or security issues caused by policies deployed via Jazzhands.
    4. Audit Trail: Leverage the version control system's history to maintain a complete audit trail of policy changes made through Jazzhands, including who initiated the changes (if tracked) and when.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Accidental Misconfiguration (Medium Severity): If a flawed policy generated by Jazzhands is deployed, versioning allows for quick rollback to a previous working state, minimizing disruption and potential security impact.
    • Operational Errors (Medium Severity): In case of operational issues caused by policy changes made by Jazzhands, rollback provides a fast recovery mechanism.
  • Impact:
    • Accidental Misconfiguration: Medium Impact - Reduces the impact of accidental misconfigurations by enabling rapid recovery and minimizing downtime related to Jazzhands policy deployments.
    • Operational Errors: Medium Impact - Improves operational resilience by providing a rollback mechanism for policy-related issues originating from Jazzhands.
  • Currently Implemented: Project Specific - Check if IAM policies managed by Jazzhands are stored in a version control system. Determine if there is a rollback process in place for policies deployed by Jazzhands.
  • Missing Implementation: Project Specific - If policies generated by Jazzhands are not versioned and there is no rollback mechanism for them, this mitigation is missing. Integrate Jazzhands (or its deployment pipeline) with a version control system and create a rollback procedure for Jazzhands-deployed policies.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Wildcard Usage in Policies (Jazzhands Managed Policies)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Wildcard Usage in Policies (Jazzhands Managed Policies)
  • Description:
    1. Policy Review for Wildcards: Review all IAM policies managed by Jazzhands and identify instances where wildcards (*) are used in Resource or Action elements. This should be part of the policy review process (Mitigation #3).
    2. Justify Wildcard Usage: For each wildcard instance in policies managed by Jazzhands, critically evaluate if it is truly necessary. Document the justification for using wildcards within the context of Jazzhands' functionality.
    3. Configure Jazzhands to Generate Specific Policies: If possible, configure Jazzhands or its policy templates to generate policies with more specific resource ARNs or action names instead of wildcards.
    4. Regularly Re-evaluate: Periodically re-evaluate wildcard usage in Jazzhands-managed policies as your IAM requirements evolve and strive to further reduce wildcards whenever possible, potentially by adjusting Jazzhands configurations or templates.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Excessive Permissions (High Severity): Wildcards in policies generated by Jazzhands can inadvertently grant broader permissions than intended, increasing the risk of unauthorized access or actions.
    • Scope Creep (Medium Severity): Over-reliance on wildcards in Jazzhands-managed policies can lead to policies becoming overly permissive over time as new resources or actions are added to AWS.
  • Impact:
    • Excessive Permissions: High Impact - Reduces the risk of unintended broad permissions in Jazzhands-managed policies by enforcing specificity in policy definitions.
    • Scope Creep: Medium Impact - Helps to maintain least privilege over time for policies managed by Jazzhands by encouraging more precise policy definitions within Jazzhands configurations.
  • Currently Implemented: Project Specific - Review existing IAM policies managed by Jazzhands to assess the level of wildcard usage. Check for any guidelines or configurations within Jazzhands to minimize wildcards in generated policies.
  • Missing Implementation: Project Specific - If policies generated by Jazzhands heavily rely on wildcards without clear justification or if there are no configurations within Jazzhands to minimize wildcard usage, this mitigation is missing. Implement a policy review process focused on reducing wildcards in Jazzhands-managed policies and explore Jazzhands configuration options to generate more specific policies.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Policy Auditing and Analysis (Jazzhands Managed Policies)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regular Policy Auditing and Analysis (Jazzhands Managed Policies)
  • Description:
    1. Schedule Regular Audits: Establish a schedule for periodic audits of IAM policies managed by Jazzhands (e.g., monthly, quarterly).
    2. Utilize Audit Tools: Use tools like AWS IAM Access Analyzer or custom scripts to analyze policies generated by Jazzhands for:
      • Overly permissive statements.
      • Unused permissions.
      • Policies that violate security best practices.
      • Potential access risks.
    3. Review Audit Findings: Review the findings of the policy audits and prioritize remediation of identified issues in policies managed by Jazzhands.
    4. Remediate and Refine: Update or refine IAM policies managed by Jazzhands (potentially by adjusting Jazzhands configurations or templates) based on audit findings to address security risks and improve adherence to least privilege.
    5. Document Audit Process: Document the audit process, findings, and remediation actions for future reference and continuous improvement of Jazzhands policy management.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Policy Drift (Medium Severity): Over time, policies managed by Jazzhands can become overly permissive or outdated as requirements change, leading to unnecessary risks.
    • Accumulated Permissions (Medium Severity): Permissions may be added to policies managed by Jazzhands over time without proper review, resulting in policies that grant more access than needed.
  • Impact:
    • Policy Drift: Medium Impact - Helps to prevent policies managed by Jazzhands from becoming outdated and overly permissive by proactively identifying and addressing policy drift.
    • Accumulated Permissions: Medium Impact - Reduces the risk of accumulated permissions in Jazzhands-managed policies by regularly reviewing and refining policies to remove unnecessary access grants.
  • Currently Implemented: Project Specific - Determine if there is a process for regularly auditing IAM policies managed by Jazzhands. Check for scheduled audits and the use of policy analysis tools specifically for Jazzhands-managed policies.
  • Missing Implementation: Project Specific - If there is no regular policy auditing process for Jazzhands-managed policies, this mitigation is missing. Implement a scheduled audit process and utilize policy analysis tools for policies generated and managed by Jazzhands.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation for User and Group Attributes (Jazzhands Input)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation for User and Group Attributes (Jazzhands Input)
  • Description:
    1. Identify Input Points: Determine all points where Jazzhands accepts user input for defining user or group attributes (e.g., usernames, group names, tags, descriptions, policy names if user-defined policies are supported).
    2. Define Validation Rules: Establish strict validation rules for each input field. Rules should include:
      • Data Type Validation: Ensure input matches the expected data type (e.g., string, integer, boolean).
      • Format Validation: Enforce specific formats (e.g., regex for usernames, ARN format for resources).
      • Length Limits: Set maximum and minimum length constraints.
      • Allowed Character Sets: Restrict input to allowed character sets (e.g., alphanumeric, specific symbols).
      • Sanitization: Sanitize input to remove or encode potentially harmful characters or code (e.g., HTML escaping, SQL injection prevention if Jazzhands interacts with a database).
    3. Implement Validation in Jazzhands: Implement these validation rules within the Jazzhands application code or configuration. Use input validation libraries or frameworks appropriate for the language Jazzhands is written in.
    4. Error Handling: Implement proper error handling for invalid input. Provide informative error messages to users and prevent processing of invalid data.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Injection Attacks (Medium to High Severity): Without input validation, attackers could inject malicious code or commands (e.g., command injection, LDAP injection, if applicable to Jazzhands' backend) through user-provided attributes, potentially compromising Jazzhands or the IAM environment.
    • Data Integrity Issues (Medium Severity): Invalid input can lead to data corruption or unexpected behavior in Jazzhands and the managed IAM environment.
  • Impact:
    • Injection Attacks: High Impact - Significantly reduces the risk of injection attacks by preventing malicious code from being processed by Jazzhands.
    • Data Integrity Issues: Medium Impact - Improves data quality and system stability by ensuring that only valid data is processed by Jazzhands.
  • Currently Implemented: Project Specific - Review the Jazzhands codebase and configuration to check for input validation mechanisms at all user input points.
  • Missing Implementation: Project Specific - If input validation is lacking or insufficient at any user input points in Jazzhands, this mitigation is missing. Implement robust input validation for all user-provided data within Jazzhands.

Mitigation Strategy: Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Enforcement Guidance within Jazzhands Workflows

  • Mitigation Strategy: Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Enforcement Guidance within Jazzhands Workflows
  • Description:
    1. Promote MFA in Documentation and Configuration: Ensure Jazzhands documentation and configuration guides strongly recommend or even require MFA for all IAM users managed by Jazzhands, especially those with administrative or privileged roles.
    2. Implement MFA Checks (Optional, if feasible within Jazzhands): If Jazzhands has features to query IAM user details, consider adding checks within Jazzhands workflows to verify if MFA is enabled for users being managed. This could be used for reporting or even blocking actions for users without MFA (depending on the desired level of enforcement).
    3. Provide MFA Enablement Tools/Scripts (Optional): If feasible, provide tools or scripts within the Jazzhands ecosystem to assist administrators in enabling MFA for IAM users in bulk or as part of user provisioning workflows.
    4. Educate Users: Educate users of Jazzhands about the importance of MFA and provide clear instructions on how to enable and use MFA for their IAM accounts.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Account Compromise (High Severity): Lack of MFA makes IAM accounts more vulnerable to password-based attacks (e.g., phishing, brute-force, credential stuffing). Compromised IAM accounts can lead to unauthorized access and significant security breaches.
  • Impact:
    • Account Compromise: High Impact - Significantly reduces the risk of account compromise by promoting and encouraging the use of MFA for IAM users managed by Jazzhands. While Jazzhands itself might not enforce MFA at the AWS IAM level (that's an AWS IAM configuration), it can play a crucial role in promoting and guiding MFA adoption within its workflows.
  • Currently Implemented: Project Specific - Check Jazzhands documentation and configuration guides for mentions of MFA recommendations. Determine if there are any MFA-related checks or tools within Jazzhands workflows.
  • Missing Implementation: Project Specific - If Jazzhands documentation and workflows do not actively promote or guide MFA adoption for managed IAM users, this mitigation is missing. Enhance Jazzhands documentation and consider adding MFA-related checks or tools to encourage MFA usage.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular User and Group Auditing and Review (Jazzhands Managed Entities)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regular User and Group Auditing and Review (Jazzhands Managed Entities)
  • Description:
    1. Schedule Regular Audits: Establish a schedule for periodic audits of IAM users and groups managed by Jazzhands (e.g., quarterly, semi-annually).
    2. Utilize Jazzhands Reporting Features (if available): Leverage any reporting or listing features within Jazzhands to generate reports of IAM users and groups it manages.
    3. Review User and Group Lists: Review these lists to identify:
      • Inactive or unnecessary accounts.
      • Users with inappropriate group memberships.
      • Groups with overly broad permissions (this ties back to policy auditing).
      • Accounts that may no longer require Jazzhands management.
    4. Remediate Issues: Based on the audit findings, take actions to:
      • Remove inactive or unnecessary IAM user accounts (through Jazzhands or directly in IAM, depending on your process).
      • Adjust group memberships as needed (using Jazzhands).
      • Refine group permissions (using Jazzhands policy management features).
      • Remove accounts from Jazzhands management if appropriate.
    5. Automate Auditing (if possible): Explore options to automate parts of the user and group auditing process, such as scripting the generation of reports from Jazzhands and potentially automating the detection of inactive accounts based on activity logs (outside of Jazzhands, using AWS CloudTrail).
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unnecessary Accounts (Medium Severity): Inactive or unnecessary IAM accounts increase the attack surface and can be potential targets for attackers.
    • Privilege Creep (Medium Severity): Over time, users may accumulate unnecessary group memberships or permissions, leading to privilege creep and increased risk.
    • Orphaned Accounts (Medium Severity): Accounts that are no longer actively managed or monitored can become security liabilities.
  • Impact:
    • Unnecessary Accounts: Medium Impact - Reduces the attack surface by removing inactive or unnecessary IAM accounts managed by Jazzhands.
    • Privilege Creep: Medium Impact - Helps to maintain least privilege by regularly reviewing and refining user and group memberships managed by Jazzhands.
    • Orphaned Accounts: Medium Impact - Improves account hygiene and reduces the risk of orphaned accounts becoming security vulnerabilities within the Jazzhands-managed IAM environment.
  • Currently Implemented: Project Specific - Determine if there is a process for regularly auditing IAM users and groups managed by Jazzhands. Check for scheduled audits and the use of Jazzhands reporting features for this purpose.
  • Missing Implementation: Project Specific - If there is no regular user and group auditing process for Jazzhands-managed entities, this mitigation is missing. Implement a scheduled audit process and leverage Jazzhands features (or develop scripts) to facilitate user and group reviews.

Mitigation Strategy: Logging and Monitoring of Jazzhands Actions

  • Mitigation Strategy: Logging and Monitoring of Jazzhands Actions
  • Description:
    1. Enable Comprehensive Logging: Configure Jazzhands to log all significant actions it performs. This should include:
      • IAM changes (user creation, deletion, modification, group changes, role changes, policy changes).
      • Authentication attempts (successful and failed).
      • Errors and exceptions encountered during operation.
      • Configuration changes to Jazzhands itself.
    2. Choose Logging Destination: Configure Jazzhands to send logs to a secure and centralized logging system. Options include:
      • Centralized Logging Service (e.g., AWS CloudWatch Logs, Splunk, ELK stack): Integrate with a dedicated logging service for centralized log management, analysis, and alerting.
      • Secure File Storage: If a centralized service is not available, ensure logs are written to secure file storage with appropriate access controls and retention policies.
    3. Implement Monitoring and Alerting: Set up monitoring and alerting on Jazzhands logs to detect:
      • Suspicious activity (e.g., unauthorized IAM changes, repeated failed authentication attempts).
      • Errors or failures in Jazzhands operation.
      • Performance issues.
    4. Regular Log Review: Establish a process for regularly reviewing Jazzhands logs to identify security incidents, operational issues, and potential areas for improvement.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Actions (Medium to High Severity): Logging helps detect unauthorized or malicious IAM changes made through or targeting Jazzhands.
    • Security Incidents (Medium to High Severity): Logs provide crucial information for investigating and responding to security incidents involving Jazzhands or the managed IAM environment.
    • Operational Issues (Medium Severity): Logging aids in identifying and troubleshooting operational problems with Jazzhands itself.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Actions: High Impact - Significantly improves the ability to detect and respond to unauthorized actions performed through Jazzhands.
    • Security Incidents: High Impact - Provides essential audit trails for security incident investigation and response.
    • Operational Issues: Medium Impact - Enhances operational visibility and facilitates troubleshooting of Jazzhands-related issues.
  • Currently Implemented: Project Specific - Check Jazzhands configuration for logging settings. Determine where logs are being sent and if monitoring/alerting is in place.
  • Missing Implementation: Project Specific - If logging is not enabled or is insufficient, or if monitoring and alerting are not configured for Jazzhands logs, this mitigation is missing. Implement comprehensive logging and monitoring for Jazzhands actions.

Mitigation Strategy: Code Review and Security Testing of Jazzhands Customizations

  • Mitigation Strategy: Code Review and Security Testing of Jazzhands Customizations
  • Description:
    1. Mandatory Code Review: Establish a mandatory code review process for all customizations, extensions, or modifications made to the core Jazzhands codebase or its configurations. Code reviews should be performed by security-conscious developers or security specialists.
    2. Security Focused Review: Code reviews should specifically focus on security aspects, including:
      • Input validation vulnerabilities.
      • Authorization and access control flaws.
      • Credential handling issues.
      • Logging and auditing weaknesses.
      • Compliance with secure coding practices.
    3. Security Testing: Conduct security testing of Jazzhands customizations, including:
      • Static Application Security Testing (SAST): Use SAST tools to automatically scan code for potential vulnerabilities.
      • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST): Perform DAST to test the running application for vulnerabilities from an external perspective.
      • Penetration Testing: Consider penetration testing by security experts to identify more complex vulnerabilities in customized Jazzhands deployments.
    4. Remediation and Retesting: Address any vulnerabilities identified during code review or security testing. Re-test after remediation to ensure vulnerabilities are properly fixed.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Introduced Vulnerabilities (Medium to High Severity): Customizations to Jazzhands can inadvertently introduce new security vulnerabilities if not properly reviewed and tested.
    • Weakened Security Posture (Medium Severity): Poorly implemented customizations can weaken the overall security posture of the Jazzhands deployment and the managed IAM environment.
  • Impact:
    • Introduced Vulnerabilities: High Impact - Significantly reduces the risk of introducing new vulnerabilities through customizations by implementing rigorous review and testing processes.
    • Weakened Security Posture: Medium Impact - Helps to maintain or improve the security posture of Jazzhands deployments by ensuring customizations are implemented securely.
  • Currently Implemented: Project Specific - Determine if there is a code review process for Jazzhands customizations. Check if security testing is performed on customizations.
  • Missing Implementation: Project Specific - If code reviews and security testing are not mandatory for Jazzhands customizations, this mitigation is missing. Implement a mandatory code review and security testing process for all modifications to Jazzhands.