Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
243 lines (196 loc) · 20.7 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

243 lines (196 loc) · 20.7 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of JazzHands based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of JazzHands' key components, identify potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses, and provide actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will focus on the application's architecture, data flow, and interactions with external systems (Okta, AWS STS, Notification Services). We aim to identify threats that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of JazzHands and the AWS resources it manages.

  • Scope: The analysis will cover the following components as described in the design review:

    • Web UI
    • API Server
    • Database (Configuration & Audit)
    • Integration with Okta (Identity Provider)
    • Integration with AWS STS
    • Integration with Notification Services
    • Deployment model (ECS/EKS)
    • Build process

    The analysis will not cover the internal security of Okta or AWS services themselves, as these are external dependencies. We will assume that these services are configured according to best practices, but we will analyze the interaction between JazzHands and these services.

  • Methodology:

    1. Component Breakdown: Analyze each component's responsibilities, security controls, and potential attack surface.
    2. Data Flow Analysis: Trace the flow of sensitive data between components and identify potential points of exposure.
    3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the STRIDE model (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and consider attack vectors relevant to each component.
    4. Vulnerability Identification: Based on the threat model and component analysis, identify specific vulnerabilities that could be exploited.
    5. Mitigation Strategies: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies to address the identified vulnerabilities. These strategies will be tailored to JazzHands and its architecture.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down each component and analyze its security implications:

  • Web UI:

    • Responsibilities: User interaction, displaying data, handling input, communicating with the API.
    • Security Controls: Input validation, output encoding, session management.
    • Threats:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If input validation and output encoding are insufficient, an attacker could inject malicious scripts into the UI, potentially stealing user sessions or performing actions on behalf of the user.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): An attacker could trick a user into making unintended requests to the API via the Web UI.
      • Session Hijacking: If session management is weak, an attacker could steal a user's session and impersonate them.
      • UI Redressing (Clickjacking): An attacker could overlay a transparent layer over the UI to trick users into clicking on unintended elements.
    • Vulnerabilities: Insufficient input validation, lack of output encoding, weak session management, missing CSRF protection, vulnerable JavaScript libraries.
    • Mitigation:
      • Strict Input Validation: Implement server-side validation using a whitelist approach. Validate all user-supplied data against expected formats and character sets.
      • Output Encoding: Encode all data displayed in the UI to prevent XSS. Use a context-aware encoding library.
      • Robust Session Management: Use strong session identifiers, implement secure cookies (HTTPOnly, Secure flags), enforce session timeouts, and provide a secure logout mechanism.
      • CSRF Protection: Implement CSRF tokens and validate them on all state-changing requests.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a CSP to restrict the resources that the browser can load, mitigating XSS and other injection attacks.
      • X-Frame-Options Header: Set the X-Frame-Options header to prevent clickjacking attacks.
      • Regularly update JavaScript libraries: Keep all front-end dependencies up-to-date to patch known vulnerabilities.

  • API Server:

    • Responsibilities: Handling requests, interacting with other components, enforcing business logic, authentication, authorization.
    • Security Controls: Authentication, authorization, input validation, rate limiting.
    • Threats:
      • Authentication Bypass: Flaws in the authentication logic could allow attackers to bypass authentication and access the API without valid credentials.
      • Authorization Bypass: Incorrectly implemented authorization checks could allow users to access resources or perform actions they are not permitted to.
      • Injection Attacks (SQL, Command, etc.): If user input is not properly sanitized, attackers could inject malicious code into database queries or system commands.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): The API could be overwhelmed with requests, making it unavailable to legitimate users.
      • Information Disclosure: Error messages or API responses could leak sensitive information about the system's internal workings.
      • Broken Object Level Authorization: API might not correctly check if the authenticated user has permissions to access or modify a specific object.
    • Vulnerabilities: Weak authentication mechanisms, insufficient authorization checks, lack of input validation, missing rate limiting, verbose error messages, insecure direct object references.
    • Mitigation:
      • Strong Authentication: Delegate authentication to Okta (SAML) and validate SAML assertions securely. Ensure proper handling of session tokens.
      • Fine-Grained Authorization: Implement role-based access control (RBAC) with clearly defined roles and permissions. Enforce the principle of least privilege. Verify authorization for every request.
      • Comprehensive Input Validation: Validate all input received from the Web UI and other sources. Use a whitelist approach and reject any unexpected input.
      • Parameterized Queries: Use parameterized queries or an ORM to prevent SQL injection. Avoid dynamic SQL generation.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to prevent DoS attacks. Limit the number of requests per user or IP address.
      • Secure Error Handling: Return generic error messages to users and log detailed error information internally. Avoid exposing sensitive information in error responses.
      • Object-Level Authorization: Ensure that every API endpoint checks that the authenticated user has permission to access the specific object being requested.
      • API Gateway: Consider using an API Gateway to handle authentication, authorization, rate limiting, and other security concerns.

  • Database (Configuration & Audit):

    • Responsibilities: Storing configuration data and audit logs.
    • Security Controls: Access controls, encryption at rest, auditing.
    • Threats:
      • SQL Injection: If the API Server is vulnerable to SQL injection, attackers could gain unauthorized access to the database.
      • Unauthorized Access: Weak access controls could allow unauthorized users or processes to access the database.
      • Data Breach: If the database is compromised, sensitive configuration data and audit logs could be stolen.
      • Data Tampering: Attackers could modify or delete data in the database, compromising the integrity of the system.
    • Vulnerabilities: Weak database credentials, lack of encryption at rest, insufficient access controls, missing audit logging.
    • Mitigation:
      • Strong Passwords: Use strong, unique passwords for all database accounts.
      • Encryption at Rest: Encrypt the database data at rest using a strong encryption algorithm.
      • Least Privilege: Grant database users only the minimum necessary privileges. Avoid using the root or administrator account for application access.
      • Database Firewall: Implement a database firewall to restrict access to the database based on IP address, user, and application.
      • Regular Backups: Create regular backups of the database and store them securely.
      • Audit Logging: Enable detailed audit logging for all database activity. Monitor the logs for suspicious activity.
      • Database Activity Monitoring (DAM): Consider using a DAM solution to monitor database activity in real-time and detect anomalies.

  • Integration with Okta (Identity Provider):

    • Responsibilities: Authenticating users.
    • Security Controls: Okta's internal security controls, MFA.
    • Threats:
      • Compromised Okta Account: If an attacker compromises an Okta account, they could gain access to JazzHands.
      • SAML Assertion Tampering: If the SAML integration is not properly secured, attackers could tamper with SAML assertions to gain unauthorized access.
      • Replay Attacks: Attackers could capture and replay valid SAML assertions to gain access.
    • Vulnerabilities: Weak Okta account security, improper SAML validation, missing replay protection.
    • Mitigation:
      • Enforce Strong Okta Security: Require strong passwords and MFA for all Okta users, especially administrators.
      • Secure SAML Configuration: Validate SAML assertions rigorously, including the signature, issuer, audience, and expiration time. Use a trusted SAML library.
      • Replay Protection: Implement measures to prevent replay attacks, such as using unique, time-limited identifiers in SAML assertions.
      • Monitor Okta Logs: Regularly review Okta logs for suspicious activity.

  • Integration with AWS STS:

    • Responsibilities: Issuing temporary credentials.
    • Security Controls: AWS IAM policies.
    • Threats:
      • Overly Permissive IAM Roles: If the IAM roles used by JazzHands are too permissive, attackers could gain access to more AWS resources than intended.
      • Credential Leakage: If temporary credentials are not handled securely, they could be leaked and used by attackers.
    • Vulnerabilities: Misconfigured IAM roles, insecure storage of temporary credentials.
    • Mitigation:
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Create IAM roles with the minimum necessary permissions. Use fine-grained permissions and avoid using wildcard permissions.
      • Short-Lived Credentials: Use the shortest possible duration for temporary credentials.
      • Secure Credential Handling: Never store temporary credentials in code or configuration files. Use environment variables or a secure credential management system.
      • Audit AWS CloudTrail: Monitor AWS CloudTrail logs for all STS activity to detect suspicious credential usage.

  • Integration with Notification Services:

    • Responsibilities: Delivering notifications.
    • Security Controls: Secure communication channels.
    • Threats:
      • Information Disclosure: If notifications contain sensitive information and are sent over insecure channels, they could be intercepted by attackers.
      • Spam/Phishing: Attackers could spoof notifications to trick users into revealing sensitive information or clicking on malicious links.
    • Vulnerabilities: Insecure communication protocols, lack of sender verification.
    • Mitigation:
      • Use HTTPS: Ensure that all communication with notification services uses HTTPS.
      • Sender Verification: If possible, verify the sender of notifications to prevent spoofing.
      • Limit Sensitive Information: Avoid including sensitive information in notifications. Provide links to the JazzHands UI instead.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on notifications to prevent spam.

  • Deployment Model (ECS/EKS):

    • Security Controls: IAM roles, security groups, network policies, container image security, limited privileges.
    • Threats:
      • Container Escape: If a container is compromised, attackers could potentially escape to the host system or other containers.
      • Network Attacks: Attackers could exploit vulnerabilities in the network configuration to gain access to containers or the database.
      • Compromised Container Image: If a container image contains vulnerabilities, attackers could exploit them to gain control of the container.
    • Vulnerabilities: Weak container isolation, misconfigured network policies, vulnerable container images.
    • Mitigation:
      • Use Minimal Base Images: Use minimal base images for containers to reduce the attack surface.
      • Regularly Scan Images: Scan container images for vulnerabilities before deployment and regularly thereafter.
      • Implement Network Segmentation: Use network policies to restrict communication between containers and other resources.
      • Least Privilege for Containers: Run containers with the minimum necessary privileges. Avoid running containers as root.
      • Security Groups: Use security groups to control inbound and outbound traffic to EC2 instances or ECS/EKS clusters.
      • IAM Roles for Tasks: Use IAM roles for ECS tasks to grant containers access to AWS resources securely.
      • Secrets Management: Use a secrets management solution (e.g., AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault) to store and manage sensitive data used by containers.

  • Build Process:

    • Security Controls: Linting, SAST, SCA, container image scanning, automated build process, secure container registry.
    • Threats:
      • Introduction of Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities could be introduced into the codebase or dependencies during the build process.
      • Compromised Build Environment: If the build environment is compromised, attackers could inject malicious code into the application.
    • Vulnerabilities: Unpatched build tools, insecure dependency management, lack of code signing.
    • Mitigation:
      • Regularly Update Build Tools: Keep all build tools and dependencies up-to-date.
      • Secure Dependency Management: Use a dependency management tool (e.g., pip with requirements.txt) to track and manage dependencies. Pin dependency versions to prevent unexpected updates.
      • Code Signing: Consider signing the built artifacts to ensure their integrity.
      • Secure Build Environment: Protect the build environment from unauthorized access. Use a dedicated, isolated environment for builds.
      • Reproducible Builds: Aim for reproducible builds to ensure that the same code always produces the same output.

3. Inferred Architecture, Components, and Data Flow

Based on the provided information, we can infer the following:

  • Architecture: JazzHands follows a fairly standard three-tier architecture (Web UI, API Server, Database) with integrations to external services (Okta, AWS STS, Notification Services). It's likely a microservices-oriented architecture, given the containerized deployment model.

  • Components: The key components are as described above.

  • Data Flow:

    1. User Access Request:

      • User interacts with the Web UI.
      • Web UI sends a request to the API Server.
      • API Server authenticates the user via Okta (SAML).
      • API Server checks authorization based on user attributes and defined roles.
      • API Server interacts with the Database to store the request and retrieve configuration data.
      • API Server sends a notification to the Notification Service.

    2. Credential Issuance:

      • API Server receives approval for the request (either manually or automatically).
      • API Server interacts with AWS STS to obtain temporary credentials.
      • API Server stores audit information in the Database.
      • API Server returns the temporary credentials to the Web UI.
      • Web UI displays the credentials to the user.

    3. Credential Revocation:

      • Credentials expire automatically (based on STS configuration).
      • API Server may have a mechanism to manually revoke credentials.
      • Revocation events are logged in the Database.

4. Tailored Security Considerations

Here are specific security considerations tailored to JazzHands:

  • SAML Assertion Validation: The most critical security aspect of the Okta integration is the rigorous validation of SAML assertions. This includes:

    • Signature Verification: Verify the digital signature of the SAML assertion using Okta's public key.
    • Issuer Validation: Ensure that the issuer of the assertion is Okta.
    • Audience Restriction: Verify that the audience of the assertion is JazzHands.
    • Time Validity: Check the NotBefore and NotOnOrAfter conditions to ensure the assertion is within its validity period.
    • Replay Prevention: Use a unique AssertionID and track them to prevent replay attacks. Implement a short validity period.
    • Attribute Validation: Carefully validate the attributes received from Okta (e.g., group memberships) and use them securely for authorization.

  • IAM Role Granularity: The design of IAM roles is crucial. Avoid overly permissive roles. Create separate roles for different user groups and different AWS resources. Use resource-based policies and condition keys to further restrict access.

  • Database Security: The database contains highly sensitive data. Implement all recommended database security measures, including encryption at rest, strong access controls, and regular auditing. Consider using a database activity monitoring (DAM) solution.

  • Error Handling: Ensure that error messages do not reveal sensitive information about the system's internal workings. Log detailed error information internally for debugging and auditing purposes.

  • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on the API to prevent DoS attacks and abuse. Consider different rate limits for different API endpoints and user roles.

  • Input Validation (Everywhere): Input validation is not just for the Web UI. The API Server must validate all input it receives, even if it comes from the Web UI (which is assumed to be trusted, but could be compromised).

  • Secrets Management: Use a dedicated secrets management solution (e.g., AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault) to store and manage sensitive data like database credentials, API keys, and Okta secrets. Never store secrets in code or configuration files.

  • Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing: Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests to identify vulnerabilities that may have been missed during the design and development process.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Summary)

The mitigation strategies are detailed within the component breakdown above. Here's a summarized, prioritized list:

  • High Priority:

    • Secure SAML Assertion Validation: Implement all recommended checks.
    • Fine-Grained IAM Roles: Enforce the principle of least privilege.
    • Database Security: Encryption at rest, strong access controls, auditing, DAM.
    • Comprehensive Input Validation (API Server): Whitelist approach, parameterized queries.
    • Robust Session Management (Web UI): Secure cookies, timeouts, CSRF protection.
    • Secrets Management: Use a dedicated solution.

  • Medium Priority:

    • Output Encoding (Web UI): Prevent XSS.
    • Rate Limiting (API Server): Prevent DoS.
    • Secure Error Handling: Avoid information disclosure.
    • Container Security: Minimal base images, image scanning, network segmentation.
    • Build Process Security: SAST, SCA, secure build environment.

  • Low Priority:

    • Notification Security: HTTPS, limit sensitive information.
    • Code Signing: Ensure build integrity.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for JazzHands. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, IFTTT can significantly improve the security posture of the application and reduce the risk of unauthorized access to its AWS resources. Continuous monitoring, regular security assessments, and staying up-to-date with security best practices are essential for maintaining a strong security posture over time.