Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
27 lines (22 loc) · 4.89 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

27 lines (22 loc) · 4.89 KB

Threat Model Analysis for ivpusic/react-native-image-crop-picker

Threat: Library Code Tampering (Supply Chain Attack)

  • Description: An attacker compromises the react-native-image-crop-picker library itself (or one of its direct dependencies) and injects malicious code. This differs from the previous entry by focusing on direct dependencies of the library, not transitive dependencies of React Native itself. This could happen through a compromised npm package, a malicious pull request that gets merged, or a direct attack on the library's repository. The attacker's goal is to gain control over the library's functionality.
    • Impact: Complete control over the library's functionality, allowing the attacker to steal data (images, metadata), execute arbitrary code within the context of the application, or cause denial of service. This is a high-impact threat because the compromised library is directly integrated into the application.
    • Affected Component: Any part of the library's code (JavaScript or native). This includes the core image selection and cropping logic, as well as any utility functions.
    • Risk Severity: Critical.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Package Manager Security: Use a reputable package manager (npm, yarn) with integrity checks (e.g., npm audit, yarn audit). Regularly run these audits to detect known vulnerabilities in the library and its direct dependencies.
      • Dependency Pinning: Pin dependencies to specific versions (using a lockfile – package-lock.json or yarn.lock) to prevent unexpected updates that might introduce vulnerabilities or malicious code. This is crucial for preventing supply-chain attacks.
      • Regular Updates: Regularly update the react-native-image-crop-picker library to the latest version to receive security patches and bug fixes. However, always review the release notes and changelog before updating.
      • Code Review (If Possible): If you have the resources and expertise, consider periodically reviewing the library's source code (especially after updates) for suspicious patterns or unexpected changes. This is a more advanced mitigation.
      • Code Signing (Native Modules): If feasible, explore using code signing and verification mechanisms for the library's native modules. This can help ensure that the native code hasn't been tampered with.

Threat: Denial of Service (Exploiting Image/Video Processing Vulnerabilities) - Direct Library Vulnerability

  • Description: This threat focuses on vulnerabilities within the react-native-image-crop-picker's own native code (not just the underlying OS libraries). An attacker crafts a specially designed image or video file that exploits a bug specifically in the library's image processing logic (e.g., a buffer overflow in its cropping implementation). This is distinct from exploiting vulnerabilities in the OS's image processing libraries.
    • Impact: Application crash, denial of service, or potentially remote code execution (RCE) if the vulnerability allows for arbitrary code execution within the context of the library's native code. The impact depends on the nature of the vulnerability.
    • Affected Component: The native image/video processing functions within the library's code, particularly those related to cropping, resizing, and format conversion. This includes any custom image manipulation logic implemented by the library.
    • Risk Severity: High (potentially Critical if RCE is possible).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Keep Library Updated: This is the primary mitigation. The library developers are responsible for fixing vulnerabilities in their code. Regularly update to the latest version to receive security patches.
      • (Difficult/Advanced): Fuzz testing of the library's own image processing functions (specifically targeting the native code) could potentially identify vulnerabilities. This requires significant expertise and resources.
      • Input Validation (Limited Effectiveness): While you can't fully sanitize an image to prevent all possible exploits, basic checks (e.g., validating the image format header, limiting dimensions) before passing data to the library's core processing functions might mitigate some attacks. However, this is not a reliable defense against sophisticated exploits targeting specific vulnerabilities. Focus on validating dimensions and file size as a first line of defense.
      • Review Pull Requests and Issues: Keep an eye on the library's GitHub repository. Review pull requests and issues, especially those related to security or image processing. This can give you early warning of potential problems.