Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
104 lines (82 loc) · 10.3 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

104 lines (82 loc) · 10.3 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for jdg/mbprogresshud

Objective: Compromise application using MBProgressHUD by exploiting vulnerabilities within MBProgressHUD or its usage.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Tree: [CRITICAL NODE] Compromise Application via MBProgressHUD Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE] └───[OR]─ [CRITICAL NODE] UI Redress/Spoofing via HUD Manipulation [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH START] │ └───[OR]─ [CRITICAL NODE] Phishing/Deception via HUD Content [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH START] │ └───[AND]─ Display Malicious or Misleading Content in HUD │ └───[OR]─ [CRITICAL NODE] Inject Unsanitized User Input into HUD Text/Details [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └───[AND]─ [CRITICAL NODE] Application Vulnerability: Lack of Input Sanitization [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───[OR]─ [CRITICAL NODE] Information Disclosure (Indirect, via UI) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH START] └───[AND]─ [CRITICAL NODE] Unintentional Display of Sensitive Information in HUD [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH START] └───[AND]─ [CRITICAL NODE] Application Logic Error Exposes Sensitive Data in HUD Text/Details [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH START] └───[AND]─ [CRITICAL NODE] Sensitive Data Accidentally Passed to HUD Display Functions [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: [CRITICAL NODE] Compromise Application via MBProgressHUD Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This is the root goal of the attacker. Exploiting vulnerabilities related to MBProgressHUD to compromise the application.
  • Likelihood: Overall likelihood depends on the specific vulnerabilities present in the application's usage of MBProgressHUD.
  • Impact: Potentially high, ranging from UI disruption to data breaches depending on the exploited vulnerability.
  • Effort: Varies depending on the specific attack path.
  • Skill Level: Varies depending on the specific attack path.
  • Detection Difficulty: Varies depending on the specific attack path.

Attack Tree Path: [CRITICAL NODE] UI Redress/Spoofing via HUD Manipulation [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH START]

  • Description: Attacks that manipulate the user interface through the HUD to deceive or mislead users.
  • Likelihood: Medium, as UI manipulation vulnerabilities are common if UI components are not handled securely.
  • Impact: Medium to High, can lead to phishing, user deception, and potentially data theft.
  • Effort: Low to Medium, depending on the specific technique.
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium, depending on the specific technique.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard, as these attacks often rely on visual deception.

Attack Tree Path: [CRITICAL NODE] Phishing/Deception via HUD Content [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH START]

  • Description: Specifically focusing on using the HUD to display malicious or misleading content to trick users.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High, especially if the application handles external or user-provided data without proper sanitization.
  • Impact: Medium to High, can lead to users divulging sensitive information, clicking malicious links, or performing unintended actions.
  • Effort: Low, often requires simple input manipulation.
  • Skill Level: Low, basic understanding of input injection.
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard, content-based attacks are difficult to detect automatically.

Attack Tree Path: [CRITICAL NODE] Inject Unsanitized User Input into HUD Text/Details [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: The attacker injects malicious content into the HUD by exploiting a lack of input sanitization in the application when displaying data in the HUD.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High, if input sanitization is not implemented for HUD content.
  • Impact: Medium to High, phishing, user deception, potential for XSS if HUD context allows (less likely with MBProgressHUD directly, but possible in broader application context).
  • Effort: Low, simple input injection techniques.
  • Skill Level: Low, basic understanding of input injection.
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard, requires content inspection and may be missed by standard security tools.
  • Actionable Insight: Sanitize all user-provided or external data before displaying it in HUD text or details. Treat HUD content as UI output and apply appropriate encoding/escaping.
  • Attack Vector Explanation: An attacker provides malicious input (e.g., crafted text with phishing links or deceptive messages) through a user-controlled input field or external data source. If the application directly displays this input in the HUD without sanitization, the malicious content becomes part of the UI, potentially deceiving the user.

Attack Tree Path: [CRITICAL NODE] Application Vulnerability: Lack of Input Sanitization [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: The underlying vulnerability that enables the "Inject Unsanitized User Input" attack. The application fails to properly sanitize or encode data before displaying it in the HUD.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High, common vulnerability in web and mobile applications.
  • Impact: Medium to High, enables phishing, XSS (in broader context), and other injection-based attacks.
  • Effort: N/A (Vulnerability, not an attack step itself)
  • Skill Level: N/A (Vulnerability, not an attack step itself)
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard, requires code review and security testing focused on input handling.
  • Actionable Insight: Implement robust input sanitization and output encoding practices throughout the application, especially for UI elements like HUDs.

Attack Tree Path: [CRITICAL NODE] Information Disclosure (Indirect, via UI) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH START]

  • Description: Attacks that lead to the unintentional disclosure of sensitive information through the HUD.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium, depends on coding practices and error handling within the application.
  • Impact: Medium to High, exposure of sensitive data, privacy violations, potential for further attacks.
  • Effort: Low, often accidental exposure due to programming errors.
  • Skill Level: Low, no special attacker skill needed to trigger the exposure.
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard, requires careful code review and security testing focused on data handling in UI.

Attack Tree Path: [CRITICAL NODE] Unintentional Display of Sensitive Information in HUD [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH START]

  • Description: Specifically focusing on scenarios where sensitive data is accidentally displayed in the HUD.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium, depends on coding practices and data handling.
  • Impact: Medium to High, exposure of sensitive data.
  • Effort: Low, accidental exposure.
  • Skill Level: Low, no special attacker skill needed.
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard, requires code review and specific testing for sensitive data exposure in UI.

Attack Tree Path: [CRITICAL NODE] Application Logic Error Exposes Sensitive Data in HUD Text/Details [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH START]

  • Description: An error in the application's logic leads to sensitive data being passed to the HUD display functions.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium, programming errors can occur, especially in complex applications.
  • Impact: Medium to High, exposure of sensitive data.
  • Effort: N/A (Error in application logic, not an attacker action directly)
  • Skill Level: N/A (Error in application logic, not an attacker action directly)
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard, requires code review and careful testing of data flow.
  • Actionable Insight: Thoroughly review code paths that display information in HUDs. Ensure no sensitive data (PII, secrets, internal system details) is inadvertently displayed. Implement data masking or filtering for HUD display.

Attack Tree Path: [CRITICAL NODE] Sensitive Data Accidentally Passed to HUD Display Functions [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: The specific programming mistake where sensitive data is unintentionally passed as an argument to functions that display content in the HUD.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium, programming errors can happen.
  • Impact: Medium to High, exposure of sensitive data.
  • Effort: N/A (Programming error)
  • Skill Level: N/A (Programming error)
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard, requires code review and careful data flow analysis.
  • Actionable Insight: Implement secure coding practices, code reviews, and automated security checks to prevent sensitive data from being logged or displayed in UI elements like HUDs. Use data masking or filtering for HUD display when dealing with potentially sensitive information.
  • Attack Vector Explanation: Due to a coding mistake, a variable or data structure containing sensitive information (e.g., user credentials, API keys, internal system identifiers) is accidentally used as input to a function that sets the text or details of the MBProgressHUD. This results in the sensitive data being displayed on the user's screen within the HUD.