Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
149 lines (99 loc) · 10.5 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

149 lines (99 loc) · 10.5 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for jdg/mbprogresshud

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update mbprogresshud

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Identify the current version of mbprogresshud used in your project by checking dependency management files (e.g., Podfile.lock, Cartfile.resolved, Package.resolved).
    • Step 2: Visit the official mbprogresshud GitHub repository (https://github.com/jdg/mbprogresshud) to find the latest released version.
    • Step 3: Compare your current version with the latest available version.
    • Step 4: If a newer version exists, update your dependency management file to specify the latest version. Use commands like pod update MBProgressHUD, carthage update MBProgressHUD, or update via Swift Package Manager in Xcode.
    • Step 5: After updating, thoroughly test your application to ensure compatibility and identify any regressions introduced by the update.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Dependency Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Using outdated versions can expose your application to known security vulnerabilities present in older versions of mbprogresshud. Updating mitigates this risk.
    • Supply Chain Attacks (Low Severity): While less likely for UI libraries, updating from the official source reduces the risk of using compromised versions if the official repository were targeted.

  • Impact:

    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: High reduction in risk by patching known vulnerabilities in mbprogresshud.
    • Supply Chain Attacks: Low reduction, primarily by maintaining alignment with the official and maintained source.

  • Currently Implemented: To be Implemented. Dependency updates for UI libraries might not be consistently prioritized.

  • Missing Implementation: Project-wide dependency management process that includes regular checks and updates for all dependencies, including UI components like mbprogresshud.

Mitigation Strategy: Verify Library Integrity

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Obtain mbprogresshud from the official GitHub repository or trusted package managers (CocoaPods, Carthage, Swift Package Manager).
    • Step 2: If manually downloading, ensure the source is the official repository and uses HTTPS for secure download.
    • Step 3: (Advanced) Consider verifying the integrity of the downloaded library, potentially by:
      • Checking checksums provided by maintainers in release notes (if available).
      • Comparing downloaded code with the official repository code.
    • Step 4: For package managers, rely on their built-in mechanisms for package integrity and authenticity verification.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Supply Chain Attacks (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of using a tampered or malicious version of mbprogresshud if the distribution channel is compromised.

  • Impact:

    • Supply Chain Attacks: Medium reduction, by increasing confidence in the library's authenticity and integrity.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Reliance on package managers provides some integrity verification. Manual steps are likely missing.

  • Missing Implementation: Formal process for verifying library integrity beyond package managers, especially for critical dependencies.

Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Displaying Sensitive Information in HUD Messages

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Review all code instances where mbprogresshud messages are displayed.
    • Step 2: Identify any messages that might contain sensitive data: PII, API keys, passwords, confidential business information, detailed error messages.
    • Step 3: Replace sensitive messages with generic, non-sensitive alternatives like "Loading...", "Processing...", "Please wait...".
    • Step 4: Ensure error logging is separate and secure, avoiding sensitive error details in HUDs.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Disclosure (High Severity): Sensitive data in HUD messages can be exposed if the device is observed or compromised.
    • Data Leakage (Medium Severity): Detailed error messages can leak internal system details.

  • Impact:

    • Information Disclosure: High reduction, preventing sensitive data display in a visible UI element.
    • Data Leakage: Medium reduction, avoiding exposure of internal details in HUD error messages.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. General awareness exists, but inadvertent display of sensitive info or detailed errors might occur.

  • Missing Implementation: Code review focused on removing sensitive info from HUD messages. Development guidelines prohibiting sensitive data in UI elements like HUDs.

Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize User Input Displayed in HUD

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Identify HUD messages dynamically generated from user input or external data.
    • Step 2: Implement input sanitization or output encoding before displaying in the HUD. Escape or encode user-provided strings.
    • Step 3: Test with various inputs, including potentially malicious ones, to ensure proper sanitization.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - (Low Severity, Highly Unlikely): Prevents potential injection if user input is used in UI elements, though very unlikely in this HUD context.
    • UI Spoofing/Misinterpretation (Low Severity): Prevents malformed input from causing unexpected HUD display.

  • Impact:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Negligible to Low reduction, XSS is not a typical HUD threat.
    • UI Spoofing/Misinterpretation: Low reduction, improves robustness and prevents minor UI issues.

  • Currently Implemented: Likely Not Implemented specifically for HUD messages due to low threat. General sanitization might exist elsewhere.

  • Missing Implementation: Specific sanitization for dynamic HUD messages. Include HUD message sanitization in input validation guidelines.

Mitigation Strategy: Handle Errors Gracefully and Avoid Exposing Error Details in HUD

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Review error handling logic where mbprogresshud is used.
    • Step 2: Ensure robust error handling to prevent crashes.
    • Step 3: Avoid showing detailed error messages, stack traces, or internal info in mbprogresshud.
    • Step 4: Display user-friendly, generic error messages like "Operation failed."
    • Step 5: Implement secure logging for detailed error information, separate from HUD display.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Detailed error messages can reveal internal system paths or technical details.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) - (Low Severity): Poor error handling could indirectly contribute to instability, though unlikely with mbprogresshud itself.

  • Impact:

    • Information Disclosure: Medium reduction, preventing exposure of technical details in UI error messages.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Negligible reduction, not directly related to mbprogresshud DoS vulnerabilities.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Basic error handling exists, but detailed error messages might still appear in some HUD instances.

  • Missing Implementation: Application-wide error handling policy prohibiting detailed error info in UI. User-friendly generic error messages for HUDs. Secure logging for detailed errors.

Mitigation Strategy: Ensure Proper Threading and Avoid UI Blocking

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Review code using mbprogresshud for long-running operations.
    • Step 2: Ensure operations are on background threads, not the main UI thread.
    • Step 3: Use threading mechanisms (GCD, Operation Queues, async/await).
    • Step 4: Display/update mbprogresshud on the main thread, but keep operations in the background.
    • Step 5: Test under load to ensure UI responsiveness while HUD is displayed.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Usability Issues Leading to Perceived Security Concerns (Low Severity): Frozen UI can create negative user experience, potentially leading to misinterpretations of application stability or security.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Low Severity - Indirect): UI blocking can indirectly contribute to resource issues.

  • Impact:

    • Usability Issues Leading to Perceived Security Concerns: Low reduction, improves user experience and reduces misinterpretations.
    • Resource Exhaustion: Negligible reduction, threading is more about performance than direct mbprogresshud security.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. General awareness of background threading exists, but UI blocking might occur in some areas.

  • Missing Implementation: Code review focused on UI blocking related to mbprogresshud. Performance testing to identify UI responsiveness bottlenecks.

Mitigation Strategy: Review Code Integrating mbprogresshud

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Conduct regular code reviews of code using mbprogresshud.
    • Step 2: Focus reviews on: correct mbprogresshud usage, no sensitive info in messages, proper error handling in HUDs, correct threading, and overall security context.
    • Step 3: Ensure reviewers understand security and usability aspects of mbprogresshud usage.
    • Step 4: Document review findings and track remediation.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • All of the above threats (Variable Severity): Code review helps identify and address various security and usability issues related to mbprogresshud usage.

  • Impact:

    • All of the above threats: Medium to High reduction, proactive measure to catch issues early.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Code reviews exist, but might not specifically focus on mbprogresshud security aspects.

  • Missing Implementation: Formalized code review process including security checks for UI components like mbprogresshud. Checklists for reviewers to address these points.