Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
152 lines (131 loc) · 10.2 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

152 lines (131 loc) · 10.2 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for jessesquires/jsqmessagesviewcontroller

Objective: Compromise application functionality and/or data integrity through JSQMessagesViewController vulnerabilities (High-Risk Paths).

Attack Tree Visualization

  • Compromise Application via JSQMessagesViewController (CRITICAL NODE)
    • Exploit Malicious Message Injection (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - like Injection (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
        • Inject Malicious URLs/Links (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
      • Large Message/Payload Injection (DoS) (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
        • Send Extremely Large Messages (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
    • Exploit UI Rendering Vulnerabilities (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Resource Exhaustion during Rendering (DoS) (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
        • Craft Messages with Complex Formatting/Layout (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
      • UI Freezing/Hanging (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
        • Messages Causing Infinite Loops in Rendering Logic (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
    • Exploit Dependency Vulnerabilities (Indirect) (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
      • Vulnerable Libraries Used by JSQMessagesViewController (CRITICAL NODE)
        • Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Dependencies (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
    • Social Engineering via Message Content (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
      • Phishing/Credential Harvesting via Messages (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
        • Send Messages Requesting Sensitive Information (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Malicious Message Injection (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Injecting crafted messages to trigger vulnerabilities in message processing or rendering.

  • Why High-Risk: This is a broad category encompassing several specific attacks, many of which are relatively easy to execute and can have significant impact. Input from messages is inherently user-controlled and thus a prime target for attackers.

    • 1.1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - like Injection (High-Risk Path & Critical Node)

      • Attack Step: Injecting malicious code (HTML, JavaScript-like) or URLs within messages.

      • Likelihood: Medium to High (depending on input sanitization).

      • Impact: Medium (Information Disclosure, UI Manipulation, Phishing).

      • Effort: Low.

      • Skill Level: Low.

      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (requires robust input validation and security testing).

      • Mitigation Strategies:

        • Strict input sanitization of all message content.
        • Escaping or removing potentially harmful HTML, JavaScript, and active content.
        • URL validation and sanitization.
        • Content Security Policy (CSP) if WebView is used.

      • 1.1.2. Inject Malicious URLs/Links (High-Risk Path & Critical Node)

        • Attack Step: Embedding malicious URLs within messages to redirect users to phishing sites or malware.
        • Likelihood: High.
        • Impact: Medium (Phishing, Malware Download, Credential Theft).
        • Effort: Low.
        • Skill Level: Low.
        • Detection Difficulty: Low (for malicious URLs themselves, harder for intent).
        • Mitigation Strategies:
          • Robust URL validation and sanitization.
          • URL reputation checks.
          • User education about suspicious links.
          • Caution with link previews.

    • 1.4. Large Message/Payload Injection (DoS) (High-Risk Path & Critical Node)

      • Attack Step: Sending extremely large messages to overwhelm application resources.
      • Likelihood: Medium.
      • Impact: Medium (Application Slowdown, UI Unresponsiveness, DoS).
      • Effort: Low.
      • Skill Level: Low.
      • Detection Difficulty: Low (performance monitoring, anomaly detection).
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Implement message size limits.
        • Optimize message processing and rendering.
        • Asynchronous message processing.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit UI Rendering Vulnerabilities (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Crafting messages that exploit weaknesses in the UI rendering process, leading to DoS or other issues.

  • Why High-Risk: UI rendering is a critical part of the application's functionality, and vulnerabilities here can directly impact user experience and availability.

    • 3.1. Resource Exhaustion during Rendering (DoS) (High-Risk Path & Critical Node)

      • Attack Step: Crafting messages with complex formatting or layout to consume excessive resources during rendering.
      • Likelihood: Medium.
      • Impact: Medium (UI Slowdown, DoS).
      • Effort: Low.
      • Skill Level: Low.
      • Detection Difficulty: Low (performance monitoring, user reports).
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Efficient rendering logic in JSQMessagesViewController and application code.
        • Resource limits on message complexity.
        • Lazy loading/virtualization of messages if applicable.

    • 3.2. UI Freezing/Hanging (High-Risk Path & Critical Node)

      • Attack Step: Sending messages that trigger infinite loops or other blocking issues in the rendering logic.
      • Likelihood: Low.
      • Impact: High (Application Freeze, DoS).
      • Effort: Medium.
      • Skill Level: Medium.
      • Detection Difficulty: Low (application freeze is easily noticeable).
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Robust rendering logic in JSQMessagesViewController.
        • Thorough testing of rendering with various message types and edge cases.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Exploit Dependency Vulnerabilities (Indirect) (High-Risk Path & Critical Node)

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries used by JSQMessagesViewController.

  • Why High-Risk: Dependency vulnerabilities can have a wide range of impacts, including Remote Code Execution, and are often easily exploitable if known vulnerabilities exist.

    • 4.1. Vulnerable Libraries Used by JSQMessagesViewController (Critical Node)

      • Attack Step: Identifying and exploiting known vulnerabilities in dependencies of JSQMessagesViewController.
      • Likelihood: Medium (depends on dependency management practices).
      • Impact: High (DoS, RCE, Data Breach - depends on the vulnerability).
      • Effort: Low (for exploiting known vulnerabilities).
      • Skill Level: Medium (understanding of vulnerability exploitation).
      • Detection Difficulty: Low (vulnerability scanners, dependency checks).
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Maintain up-to-date dependencies for JSQMessagesViewController and the application.
        • Regularly scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
        • Dependency auditing and secure dependency management practices.

    • 4.1.1. Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Dependencies (High-Risk Path & Critical Node)

      • Attack Step: Specifically targeting known vulnerabilities in JSQMessagesViewController's dependencies.
      • Likelihood: Medium (if dependencies are not managed properly).
      • Impact: High (DoS, RCE, Data Breach).
      • Effort: Low (if exploits are readily available).
      • Skill Level: Medium.
      • Detection Difficulty: Low (vulnerability scanners).
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Proactive dependency updates and vulnerability patching.
        • Automated vulnerability scanning tools.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Social Engineering via Message Content (High-Risk Path & Critical Node)

  • Attack Vector: Using message content to manipulate users into performing actions that compromise security.

  • Why High-Risk: Social engineering attacks are often highly effective because they target human psychology rather than technical vulnerabilities. They can bypass technical security measures.

    • 5.1. Phishing/Credential Harvesting via Messages (High-Risk Path & Critical Node)

      • Attack Step: Sending messages designed to trick users into revealing sensitive information (credentials, personal data).
      • Likelihood: High.
      • Impact: High (Credential Theft, Identity Theft, Financial Fraud).
      • Effort: Low.
      • Skill Level: Low.
      • Detection Difficulty: High (very difficult to detect technically).
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • User education and security awareness training about phishing attacks.
        • Clear UI design to distinguish legitimate messages from potentially malicious ones.
        • Reporting mechanisms for suspicious messages.

    • 5.1.1. Send Messages Requesting Sensitive Information (High-Risk Path & Critical Node)

      • Attack Step: Specifically crafting messages that directly request sensitive information from users, often impersonating trusted entities.
      • Likelihood: High.
      • Impact: High (Credential Theft, Identity Theft, Financial Fraud).
      • Effort: Low.
      • Skill Level: Low.
      • Detection Difficulty: High.
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Strong user education and awareness programs.
        • Emphasize never sharing sensitive information through messages.
        • Implement multi-factor authentication to reduce the impact of credential theft.