Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
34 lines (29 loc) · 4.97 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

34 lines (29 loc) · 4.97 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for jessesquires/jsqmessagesviewcontroller

Attack Surface: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Message Text

  • Description: Injection of malicious JavaScript into the message display area, executed within the context of the JSQMessagesViewController's rendering engine.
  • JSQ Contribution: This is entirely dependent on how JSQMessagesViewController handles and renders user-provided message text. If it uses a UIWebView or a custom rendering engine that doesn't properly sanitize HTML/JavaScript, it's directly vulnerable.
  • Example: An attacker sends a message: <script>alert('XSS');</script>. If JSQMessagesViewController renders this without sanitization, the script executes.
  • Impact: Compromise of the user's session within the application, data theft (limited to what the app has access to), phishing, defacement, execution of arbitrary JavaScript code within the app's context.
  • Risk Severity: Critical (if a UIWebView or similar is used); High (if native rendering with potential URL scheme exploits, but less direct control).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developer:
      • Robust HTML Sanitization: Use a well-vetted HTML sanitizer library to remove or escape all potentially dangerous HTML tags and attributes. A whitelist approach (allowing only a very limited set of safe tags) is strongly recommended. Never trust user-provided input.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): If (and only if) a UIWebView or a web-based rendering component is used, implement a strict CSP to prevent the execution of any inline scripts and tightly control the sources from which scripts can be loaded. This is a crucial defense-in-depth measure.
      • Contextual Output Encoding: Ensure that data is properly encoded for the specific context in which it is displayed within the JSQMessagesViewController. For example, if displaying text within an HTML attribute, use attribute encoding. This prevents attackers from breaking out of the intended context.
      • Avoid UIWebView: Strongly prefer native rendering components (e.g., UITextView, UILabel) over UIWebView whenever possible. Native components are generally less susceptible to XSS.

Attack Surface: Malicious Media File Exploits (Direct Handling)

  • Description: Exploitation of vulnerabilities in media processing libraries through files handled directly by JSQMessagesViewController. This is distinct from general media handling in iOS.
  • JSQ Contribution: If JSQMessagesViewController performs any processing on media files (e.g., resizing, thumbnail generation, format conversion, metadata extraction) before passing them to system libraries, it introduces a direct attack surface. If it only displays them using standard iOS components, the risk is lower (and shifts to the OS).
  • Example: An attacker uploads a crafted image designed to trigger a buffer overflow in JSQMessagesViewController's own image resizing logic (if it has any). This is different from exploiting ImageIO directly.
  • Impact: Application crash, denial-of-service, potential for arbitrary code execution (if the vulnerability is in JSQMessagesViewController's code). The severity depends on the specific vulnerability and the level of processing done by the library.
  • Risk Severity: High (potential for code execution, but depends on the library's internal handling of media).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developer:
      • Minimize Custom Media Processing: Avoid implementing custom media processing logic within JSQMessagesViewController if at all possible. Rely on standard iOS components (e.g., UIImageView) for displaying media, as these are generally well-vetted and regularly updated.
      • If Custom Processing is Necessary:
        • File Type Validation (Magic Numbers): Rigorously validate file types based on their content (magic numbers/file signatures), not just file extensions.
        • File Size Limits: Enforce strict limits on the size of media files processed by the library.
        • Sandboxing: If feasible, perform any custom media processing in a separate, sandboxed process to contain potential exploits. This is a complex but effective mitigation.
        • Fuzz Testing: Use fuzz testing techniques to test the library's media handling code with a wide range of malformed and unexpected inputs.
        • Memory Safety: Use memory-safe languages or techniques (e.g., Swift's memory management) to reduce the risk of buffer overflows and other memory-related vulnerabilities.
      • Metadata Stripping (if custom handling): If the library reads or processes metadata, remove or sanitize potentially dangerous metadata (EXIF, ID3) from media files before any other processing.