Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
102 lines (90 loc) · 10.4 KB

File metadata and controls

102 lines (90 loc) · 10.4 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for jessesquires/jsqmessagesviewcontroller

Objective: Disrupt/Manipulate/Exfiltrate via jsqmessagesviewcontroller (Focus: Inject Malicious Content & Exfiltrate Sensitive Data)

Attack Tree Visualization

                                  Attacker's Goal:
                                  Disrupt/Manipulate/Exfiltrate via jsqmessagesviewcontroller
                                          |
                                          |
                  -------------------------------------------------
                  |                                               |
                  V                                               V
           Inject Malicious Content                       Exfiltrate Sensitive Data
           /       |       \                               /       |       \
          /        |        \                             /        |        \
         /         |         \                           /         |         \
        V          V          V                         V          V          V
 **XSS via**  XSS via    XSS via              **Bypass**    Leak     **Access**
 **Message**  Media      JS                   **Input**     Message  **Message**
 **Text**     Attachments  API                  **Validation**History  **Content**
 **CRITICAL**                                  **CRITICAL**           **CRITICAL**
 **NODE**                                      **NODE**               **NODE**

Attack Tree Path: Inject Malicious Content

  • XSS via Message Text (CRITICAL NODE):

    • Description: The attacker sends a message containing malicious JavaScript code within the message text. If jsqmessagesviewcontroller or the backend fails to properly sanitize or escape this input before rendering it in the user interface, the code will execute in the context of other users' browsers.
    • Likelihood: Low (If proper server-side sanitization is in place) to High (If sanitization is weak or absent)
    • Impact: High to Very High (Can lead to account takeover, session hijacking, data theft, defacement, and the spread of malware.)
    • Effort: Low to Medium (Simple XSS payloads are easy to create; more complex payloads require more effort.)
    • Skill Level: Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard (Requires analyzing network traffic for suspicious payloads and monitoring client-side behavior for unexpected script execution.)
    • Mitigation:
      • Strict Server-Side Input Sanitization: Use a well-vetted and up-to-date HTML sanitization library (e.g., DOMPurify) on the server to remove or neutralize any potentially malicious code before storing or displaying the message. Client-side sanitization is insufficient.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strong CSP to restrict the sources from which scripts can be loaded, limiting the impact of successful XSS injections.
      • Output Encoding: Ensure that all message content is properly encoded (e.g., HTML entity encoding) when displayed in the UI, preventing the browser from interpreting malicious code as executable.
      • Context-Aware Sanitization: Sanitize data differently depending on where it will be displayed (e.g., plain text, HTML attributes, JavaScript contexts).
  • XSS via Media Attachments:

    • Description: The attacker uploads a malicious file (e.g., an HTML file disguised as an image or a JavaScript file) as a media attachment. If the application or jsqmessagesviewcontroller doesn't properly validate the file type and content, the malicious file could be executed in the user's browser.
    • Likelihood: Low (If proper file type validation and content handling are in place)
    • Impact: High to Very High (Similar to XSS via message text)
    • Effort: Medium (Requires crafting a malicious file and bypassing file type checks)
    • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard (Requires analyzing uploaded files and monitoring server-side and client-side behavior for suspicious activity.)
    • Mitigation:
      • Strict Server-Side File Type Validation: Do not rely on the file extension or client-provided MIME type. Use a library that analyzes the file's content to determine its true type.
      • Content-Type Header Control: Serve all attachments with the correct Content-Type header. For untrusted content, use Content-Type: application/octet-stream and Content-Disposition: attachment to force the browser to download the file instead of rendering it.
      • Sandboxing: Render attachments in a sandboxed environment (e.g., an iframe with the sandbox attribute) to limit their ability to interact with the main application.
      • Malware Scanning: Implement server-side malware scanning for all uploaded attachments.
  • XSS via JS API:

    • Description: The attacker exploits vulnerabilities in how the jsqmessagesviewcontroller library handles data passed through its JavaScript API. If the API doesn't properly sanitize or validate input, it could be used to inject malicious code.
    • Likelihood: Low (If the API has proper input validation)
    • Impact: High to Very High (Similar to other XSS attacks)
    • Effort: Medium to High (Requires understanding the API and crafting a malicious payload)
    • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced
    • Detection Difficulty: Hard (Requires analyzing API calls and client-side behavior)
    • Mitigation:
      • Strict API Input Validation: Thoroughly validate and sanitize all data passed to the jsqmessagesviewcontroller API. Treat all API input as potentially untrusted.
      • Type Checking: Use strong type checking (e.g., TypeScript) to help prevent passing invalid data to the API.
      • Documentation: Clearly document the expected data types and formats for all API parameters.

Attack Tree Path: Exfiltrate Sensitive Data

  • Bypass Input Validation (CRITICAL NODE):

    • Description: The attacker bypasses client-side input validation (which is often present for user experience but not security) and directly interacts with the server-side API. This allows them to send crafted requests that might retrieve unauthorized data or inject malicious data that circumvents intended security controls.
    • Likelihood: Medium to High (If server-side validation is weak or absent)
    • Impact: High to Very High (Could allow attackers to send malicious messages, access unauthorized data, or perform other unauthorized actions.)
    • Effort: Low (Can be achieved by using browser developer tools or scripting to directly interact with the server-side API.)
    • Skill Level: Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Requires monitoring server-side API requests and comparing them to expected client-side behavior. Anomalous requests or data access patterns should be flagged.)
    • Mitigation:
      • Robust Server-Side Validation: Always perform comprehensive input validation on the server-side. Never rely solely on client-side validation for security. Validate all data received from the client, including message content, sender information, and any other parameters.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure that the server-side API only exposes the minimum necessary data and functionality to the client.
  • Leak Message History:

    • Description: The attacker exploits vulnerabilities in how the application or jsqmessagesviewcontroller loads, stores, or caches message history. This could allow them to access messages from other users, messages that should have been deleted, or messages outside of their authorized scope.
    • Likelihood: Low (If proper authorization and caching mechanisms are in place)
    • Impact: High (Could expose private conversations and sensitive information)
    • Effort: Medium (Requires exploiting vulnerabilities in message loading or caching)
    • Skill Level: Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard (Requires analyzing message loading patterns, cache access, and server logs.)
    • Mitigation:
      • Strict Authorization Checks: Implement robust authorization checks for all message loading requests. Ensure that users can only access messages they are authorized to see.
      • Secure Caching: If caching is used, ensure that the cache is properly secured and that cached data is only accessible to authorized users. Implement appropriate cache invalidation mechanisms.
      • Data Retention Policies: Implement and enforce data retention policies. Delete messages after a defined period to minimize the risk of data exposure.
  • Access Message Content (CRITICAL NODE):

    • Description: The attacker gains direct access to the raw content of messages, potentially bypassing encryption or other security measures. This is the most severe data exfiltration scenario.
    • Likelihood: Low (If E2EE or strong server-side encryption is used)
    • Impact: Very High (Direct access to message content, potentially including highly sensitive information)
    • Effort: High to Very High (Requires bypassing encryption, compromising the server, or exploiting significant vulnerabilities in the application's core logic.)
    • Skill Level: Advanced to Expert
    • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard (Requires advanced intrusion detection capabilities, monitoring of data access patterns, and potentially forensic analysis.)
    • Mitigation:
      • End-to-End Encryption (E2EE): If message confidentiality is paramount, implement E2EE. This ensures that only the sender and recipient can decrypt the messages, protecting them even from the server.
      • Strong Server-Side Encryption (If E2EE is not feasible): If messages are stored on the server, encrypt them at rest using strong encryption algorithms and securely manage the encryption keys.
      • Strict Access Controls: Implement strict access controls to limit who can access the message storage and decryption keys.
      • Auditing: Implement comprehensive auditing of all data access attempts.