- Description: An attacker intercepts the application's execution before the
YTKRequest
object is finalized and sent. They modify therequestArgument
property (or similar properties controlling request parameters) to inject malicious values, alter existing parameters, or add new, unexpected parameters. This relies on the mutability of theYTKRequest
object before the request is dispatched byytknetwork
.- Impact:
- Data Modification: Unauthorized changes to data on the remote server.
- Bypassing Security Controls: Circumventing server-side authorization or validation.
- Command Injection (Remote Server): In severe cases, leading to arbitrary code execution on the server if the server-side is vulnerable.
- Affected ytknetwork Component:
YTKRequest
class (specifically, properties likerequestArgument
,requestUrl
, and any methods used to set headers or the request body). The core issue is the mutability of the request object before it's sent, a direct characteristic of howytknetwork
handles requests. - Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the server-side handling).
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Immutable Request Objects (Ideal, but likely requires library modification): The best solution would be for
YTKRequest
objects to be immutable after creation. This is a direct change toytknetwork
's design. - Request Signing (If Supported by Server): Implement request signing (e.g., HMAC) if the server supports it. This involves adding a signature calculated from request parameters and a secret key. This would likely require custom code around
ytknetwork
usage, but addresses the core issue of request mutability. - Application-Level Input Validation (Essential, but not a complete solution): While crucial, application-level validation alone doesn't fully address the threat, as it doesn't prevent modification after the application has prepared the request but before
ytknetwork
sends it.
- Immutable Request Objects (Ideal, but likely requires library modification): The best solution would be for
- Impact:
- Description:
ytknetwork
receives a malicious response from the server (due to a compromised server or a man-in-the-middle attack). The library populates theresponseJSONObject
(or similar response data properties) with this malicious data. The vulnerability arises from the application trusting the data provided byytknetwork
without further validation.- Impact:
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If response data is rendered without escaping, leading to XSS.
- Data Corruption: Malicious data corrupting the application's state.
- Code Execution (Less Likely, but Possible): Potential for code execution if response data is used unsafely (e.g., deserialization vulnerabilities).
- Affected ytknetwork Component:
YTKRequest
class (specifically, properties likeresponseJSONObject
,responseString
,responseData
, and any methods used to access the response). The core issue is thatytknetwork
provides access to potentially untrusted data without inherently enforcing safety. - Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on how the response data is used).
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Treat All
ytknetwork
-Provided Response Data as Untrusted: The application must assume that any data obtained fromytknetwork
's response properties is potentially malicious. - Strict Output Encoding/Escaping (Application-Level, but crucial): If response data is displayed, it must be properly encoded/escaped. This is primarily an application-level responsibility, but it's triggered by the data provided by
ytknetwork
. - Response Validation (Application-Level, but crucial): Validate the structure and content of the response data before using it, even after it's been processed by
ytknetwork
.
- Treat All
- Impact:
- Description: An attacker performs a man-in-the-middle attack. If
ytknetwork
, through itsYTKNetworkConfig
(or equivalent configuration), is not explicitly configured to enforce the latest TLS/SSL protocols, the attacker can force a downgrade to a weaker, vulnerable protocol. This is a direct consequence of howytknetwork
handles network security settings.- Impact:
- Data Interception: The attacker can decrypt and read the communication.
- Data Modification: The attacker can alter the data in transit.
- Affected ytknetwork Component:
YTKNetworkConfig
class (or any configuration mechanism used to set network settings, specifically TLS/SSL protocol versions and certificate validation options). This is a direct configuration issue withinytknetwork
. - Risk Severity: Critical.
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Enforce TLS 1.3 (or Latest) via
YTKNetworkConfig
: Explicitly configureytknetwork
to only use TLS 1.3 (or the latest secure version). Disable all older, insecure protocols. This is a direct configuration change withinytknetwork
. - Strict Certificate Validation via
YTKNetworkConfig
: Ensureytknetwork
is configured to rigorously validate server certificates, including revocation checks, chain validation, and hostname verification. This is also a direct configuration change withinytknetwork
.
- Enforce TLS 1.3 (or Latest) via
- Impact: