Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
42 lines (35 loc) · 5.79 KB

File metadata and controls

42 lines (35 loc) · 5.79 KB

Threat Model Analysis for kanyun-inc/ytknetwork

  • Description: An attacker intercepts the application's execution before the YTKRequest object is finalized and sent. They modify the requestArgument property (or similar properties controlling request parameters) to inject malicious values, alter existing parameters, or add new, unexpected parameters. This relies on the mutability of the YTKRequest object before the request is dispatched by ytknetwork.
    • Impact:
      • Data Modification: Unauthorized changes to data on the remote server.
      • Bypassing Security Controls: Circumventing server-side authorization or validation.
      • Command Injection (Remote Server): In severe cases, leading to arbitrary code execution on the server if the server-side is vulnerable.
    • Affected ytknetwork Component: YTKRequest class (specifically, properties like requestArgument, requestUrl, and any methods used to set headers or the request body). The core issue is the mutability of the request object before it's sent, a direct characteristic of how ytknetwork handles requests.
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the server-side handling).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Immutable Request Objects (Ideal, but likely requires library modification): The best solution would be for YTKRequest objects to be immutable after creation. This is a direct change to ytknetwork's design.
      • Request Signing (If Supported by Server): Implement request signing (e.g., HMAC) if the server supports it. This involves adding a signature calculated from request parameters and a secret key. This would likely require custom code around ytknetwork usage, but addresses the core issue of request mutability.
      • Application-Level Input Validation (Essential, but not a complete solution): While crucial, application-level validation alone doesn't fully address the threat, as it doesn't prevent modification after the application has prepared the request but before ytknetwork sends it.
  • Description: ytknetwork receives a malicious response from the server (due to a compromised server or a man-in-the-middle attack). The library populates the responseJSONObject (or similar response data properties) with this malicious data. The vulnerability arises from the application trusting the data provided by ytknetwork without further validation.
    • Impact:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If response data is rendered without escaping, leading to XSS.
      • Data Corruption: Malicious data corrupting the application's state.
      • Code Execution (Less Likely, but Possible): Potential for code execution if response data is used unsafely (e.g., deserialization vulnerabilities).
    • Affected ytknetwork Component: YTKRequest class (specifically, properties like responseJSONObject, responseString, responseData, and any methods used to access the response). The core issue is that ytknetwork provides access to potentially untrusted data without inherently enforcing safety.
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on how the response data is used).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Treat All ytknetwork-Provided Response Data as Untrusted: The application must assume that any data obtained from ytknetwork's response properties is potentially malicious.
      • Strict Output Encoding/Escaping (Application-Level, but crucial): If response data is displayed, it must be properly encoded/escaped. This is primarily an application-level responsibility, but it's triggered by the data provided by ytknetwork.
      • Response Validation (Application-Level, but crucial): Validate the structure and content of the response data before using it, even after it's been processed by ytknetwork.
  • Description: An attacker performs a man-in-the-middle attack. If ytknetwork, through its YTKNetworkConfig (or equivalent configuration), is not explicitly configured to enforce the latest TLS/SSL protocols, the attacker can force a downgrade to a weaker, vulnerable protocol. This is a direct consequence of how ytknetwork handles network security settings.
    • Impact:
      • Data Interception: The attacker can decrypt and read the communication.
      • Data Modification: The attacker can alter the data in transit.
    • Affected ytknetwork Component: YTKNetworkConfig class (or any configuration mechanism used to set network settings, specifically TLS/SSL protocol versions and certificate validation options). This is a direct configuration issue within ytknetwork.
    • Risk Severity: Critical.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Enforce TLS 1.3 (or Latest) via YTKNetworkConfig: Explicitly configure ytknetwork to only use TLS 1.3 (or the latest secure version). Disable all older, insecure protocols. This is a direct configuration change within ytknetwork.
      • Strict Certificate Validation via YTKNetworkConfig: Ensure ytknetwork is configured to rigorously validate server certificates, including revocation checks, chain validation, and hostname verification. This is also a direct configuration change within ytknetwork.