Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
148 lines (123 loc) · 10.2 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

148 lines (123 loc) · 10.2 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for kevinzhow/pnchart

Objective: Achieve RCE or DoS via pnchart

Attack Tree Visualization

Goal: Achieve RCE or DoS via pnchart
├── 1. Achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE)
│   └── 1.1 Exploit Vulnerability in Image Processing Library (Dependency)
│       ├── 1.1.1  Identify Vulnerable Dependency (e.g., Pillow CVE)
│       │   ├── 1.1.1.1 Analyze pnchart's dependency list (requirements.txt, setup.py)
│       │   └── 1.1.1.2  Cross-reference with known CVE databases
│       ├── 1.1.2  Craft Malicious Input Data to Trigger Vulnerability (CRITICAL NODE)
│       │   ├── 1.1.2.1 Understand how pnchart passes data to the image library (CRITICAL NODE)
│       │   ├── 1.1.2.2  Create input that exploits a specific image library vulnerability (CRITICAL NODE)
│       │   └── 1.1.2.3  Deliver the malicious input to the application using pnchart
│       └── 1.1.3  Gain Code Execution (CRITICAL NODE)
│           └── 1.1.3.1  Leverage the image library vulnerability to execute arbitrary code (CRITICAL NODE)
└── 2. Achieve Denial of Service (DoS)
    └── 2.1 Resource Exhaustion
        ├── 2.1.1  Memory Exhaustion
        │   ├── 2.1.1.1  Identify how pnchart allocates memory for chart data (CRITICAL NODE)
        │   ├── 2.1.1.2  Craft input with excessively large data sets or complex structures (CRITICAL NODE)
        │   └── 2.1.1.3  Send the malicious input to the application
        └── 2.1.2  CPU Exhaustion
            ├── 2.1.2.1  Identify computationally expensive operations in pnchart
            ├── 2.1.2.2  Craft input that triggers these operations repeatedly or with large inputs
            └── 2.1.2.3  Send the malicious input to the application

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path 1: RCE via Dependency Vulnerability (1 -> 1.1 -> 1.1.2 -> 1.1.3)

  • Overall Reasoning: This path represents the most significant threat due to the potential for complete system compromise. Image processing libraries are complex and have a history of vulnerabilities.

  • 1.1.1 Identify Vulnerable Dependency:

    • Likelihood: Medium - Depends on the specific dependencies and their update status.
    • Impact: Very High - A vulnerable dependency can lead to RCE.
    • Effort: Low - Checking dependencies is a standard practice.
    • Skill Level: Intermediate - Requires knowledge of vulnerability databases and dependency management.
    • Detection Difficulty: Easy - Automated tools can identify known vulnerable dependencies.

  • 1.1.2 Craft Malicious Input Data to Trigger Vulnerability (CRITICAL NODE):

    • Likelihood: Medium - Success depends on understanding the vulnerability and how pnchart interacts with the dependency.

    • Impact: Very High - Successfully crafted input leads to exploitation.

    • Effort: High - Requires significant expertise in exploit development.

    • Skill Level: Advanced - Deep understanding of image processing vulnerabilities and exploit techniques.

    • Detection Difficulty: Hard - Well-crafted exploits can be difficult to detect without specialized tools.

    • 1.1.2.1 Understand how pnchart passes data to the image library (CRITICAL NODE):

      • Likelihood: High - Achievable through code review.
      • Impact: Very High - Essential for crafting the exploit.
      • Effort: Medium - Requires code analysis skills.
      • Skill Level: Intermediate - Understanding of Python and library interaction.
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Requires manual code review or dynamic analysis.

    • 1.1.2.2 Create input that exploits a specific image library vulnerability (CRITICAL NODE):

      • Likelihood: Medium - Depends on the specific vulnerability.
      • Impact: Very High - This is the core of the exploit.
      • Effort: High - Requires in-depth knowledge of the vulnerability.
      • Skill Level: Advanced - Exploit development expertise.
      • Detection Difficulty: Hard - Can be very difficult to detect without advanced security tools.

    • 1.1.2.3 Deliver the malicious input to the application using pnchart:

      • Likelihood: High - Assuming the application accepts user input for chart generation.
      • Impact: Very High - Delivers the payload to the vulnerable component.
      • Effort: Low - Simple if the application has an input vector.
      • Skill Level: Novice - Basic understanding of web application interaction.
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Depends on input validation and logging.

  • 1.1.3 Gain Code Execution (CRITICAL NODE):

    • Likelihood: High - If the previous steps are successful, code execution is highly likely.

    • Impact: Very High - Full control of the server.

    • Effort: N/A - This is the outcome of the previous steps.

    • Skill Level: N/A - This is the outcome of the previous steps.

    • Detection Difficulty: Hard - May require advanced intrusion detection systems.

    • 1.1.3.1 Leverage the image library vulnerability to execute arbitrary code (CRITICAL NODE):

      • Likelihood: High - This is the typical goal of exploiting such vulnerabilities.
      • Impact: Very High - Complete system compromise.
      • Effort: N/A - Consequence of successful exploitation.
      • Skill Level: N/A - Consequence of successful exploitation.
      • Detection Difficulty: Hard - Requires advanced monitoring and intrusion detection.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path 2: DoS via Memory Exhaustion (2 -> 2.1 -> 2.1.1)

  • Overall Reasoning: This path is relatively easy to execute and can disrupt service availability.

  • 2.1.1 Memory Exhaustion:

    • Likelihood: High - Many applications are vulnerable to memory exhaustion if input sizes are not limited.

    • Impact: Medium - Causes service disruption, but not necessarily data loss or compromise.

    • Effort: Low - Easy to craft large inputs.

    • Skill Level: Novice - Requires minimal technical skill.

    • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Can be detected through resource monitoring, but may be mistaken for legitimate high load.

    • 2.1.1.1 Identify how pnchart allocates memory for chart data (CRITICAL NODE):

      • Likelihood: High - Can be determined through code analysis or profiling.
      • Impact: Medium - Necessary for crafting an effective DoS attack.
      • Effort: Low - Relatively easy with profiling tools.
      • Skill Level: Intermediate - Requires understanding of memory management in Python.
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy - Profiling tools can reveal memory allocation patterns.

    • 2.1.1.2 Craft input with excessively large data sets or complex structures (CRITICAL NODE):

      • Likelihood: High - Trivial to create large data.
      • Impact: Medium - Directly contributes to memory exhaustion.
      • Effort: Low - Requires minimal effort.
      • Skill Level: Novice - Basic understanding of data structures.
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Can be detected through input validation and size limits.

    • 2.1.1.3 Send the malicious input to the application:

      • Likelihood: High - Assuming the application accepts user input.
      • Impact: Medium - Triggers the memory exhaustion.
      • Effort: Low - Simple if the application has an input vector.
      • Skill Level: Novice - Basic understanding of web application interaction.
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy - Can be detected through input validation and monitoring.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path 3: DoS via CPU Exhaustion (2 -> 2.1 -> 2.1.2)

  • Overall Reasoning: Similar to memory exhaustion, but targets CPU resources. Can be harder to achieve consistently.

  • 2.1.2 CPU Exhaustion:

    • Likelihood: Medium - Depends on the complexity of chart generation and the server's processing power.

    • Impact: Medium - Causes service slowdown or unavailability.

    • Effort: Low to Medium - Requires some experimentation to find effective inputs.

    • Skill Level: Intermediate - Requires understanding of algorithmic complexity.

    • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Can be detected through CPU usage monitoring.

    • 2.1.2.1 Identify computationally expensive operations in pnchart:

      • Likelihood: Medium - Requires code analysis and profiling.
      • Impact: Medium - Necessary for crafting an effective CPU exhaustion attack.
      • Effort: Medium - Requires code analysis and profiling tools.
      • Skill Level: Intermediate - Understanding of algorithm performance.
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Profiling tools can identify CPU-intensive functions.

    • 2.1.2.2 Craft input that triggers these operations repeatedly or with large inputs:

      • Likelihood: Medium - May require experimentation.
      • Impact: Medium - Directly contributes to CPU exhaustion.
      • Effort: Low - Once the expensive operations are identified, crafting input is relatively easy.
      • Skill Level: Intermediate - Understanding of how input affects algorithm performance.
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Can be detected through input validation and monitoring.

    • 2.1.2.3 Send the malicious input to the application:

      • Likelihood: High - Assuming the application accepts user input.
      • Impact: Medium - Triggers the CPU exhaustion.
      • Effort: Low - Simple if the application has an input vector.
      • Skill Level: Novice - Basic understanding of web application interaction.
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy - Can be detected through input validation and monitoring.