Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
46 lines (39 loc) · 4.2 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

46 lines (39 loc) · 4.2 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for kif-framework/kif

Attack Surface: Accessibility Abuse

  • Description: Exploitation of iOS Accessibility APIs, leveraged by KIF's core functionality, to control or monitor the application's UI.
  • How KIF Contributes: KIF directly uses Accessibility APIs to identify and interact with UI elements. It sets and relies on accessibility identifiers. This is its fundamental mechanism.
  • Example: A malicious app, using Accessibility APIs, detects KIF-assigned accessibility labels present in a (vulnerable) release build. It then sends a fabricated touch event to a "Confirm Payment" button, bypassing security measures.
  • Impact:
    • Data breaches (reading sensitive on-screen information).
    • Unauthorized actions (performing actions without user consent).
    • Complete UI hijacking.
    • Test interference (if tests are running).
  • Risk Severity: Critical (if KIF components are in production builds) / High (in debug builds, but still a significant risk).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Conditional Compilation (Essential): Completely remove all KIF-related code, including accessibility identifier assignments, from production builds using preprocessor directives (#if DEBUG). This is non-negotiable.
    • Obfuscation (Limited Benefit): In debug builds only, consider obfuscating KIF's accessibility identifiers. This is a weak defense, but adds a minor hurdle.
    • Minimal Accessibility Exposure: Expose only the absolute minimum UI elements necessary for testing via accessibility. Never expose sensitive data through accessibility labels.
    • Code Reviews: Rigorous code reviews to prevent accidental inclusion of KIF code or identifiers in production code paths.
    • Isolated Testing Environments: Run KIF tests in isolated simulators or dedicated test devices.

Attack Surface: Test Code Exposure (Indirect, but KIF-Specific)

  • Description: Leakage of KIF test code, revealing application internals and attack vectors. While the code itself isn't executed in production, its content is the risk.
  • How KIF Contributes: KIF test code directly interacts with the UI and contains details about expected behavior, navigation, and internal identifiers (even if obfuscated). This is highly specific to KIF's usage.
  • Example: A leaked IPA (even a stripped release build) contains remnants of KIF test code. An attacker analyzes this code to understand how to trigger a specific, vulnerable UI state by simulating a sequence of actions.
  • Impact:
    • Greatly facilitates reverse engineering.
    • Reveals potential vulnerabilities and attack strategies.
    • Aids in crafting precise, targeted attacks.
  • Risk Severity: High (because the leaked information directly relates to how KIF interacts with the app, providing valuable attack insights).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Code Separation: Maintain absolute separation between KIF test code and production code. Use separate Xcode targets and build configurations. Ensure test code is never included in release builds.
    • Source Code Control Security: Strong access controls and security measures for the source code repository are paramount.
    • Code Reviews: Regular code reviews to prevent accidental inclusion of test code.
    • Build Process Audits: Verify that the build process correctly excludes test code from release builds.

Attack Surface: Runtime Manipulation (Conditional on KIF's Presence)

  • Description: Exploitation of KIF components if they are present at runtime.
  • How KIF Contributes: If KIF is present, its methods could be invoked.
  • Example: Code injection vulnerability allows attacker to call KIF methods.
  • Impact: Unauthorized UI control, data access.
  • Risk Severity: Critical (if KIF is present in production).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Complete Removal from Production (Primary): Ensure KIF is entirely removed.