Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of the onboard project based on the provided security design review and the GitHub repository (https://github.com/mamaral/onboard).

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the onboard application, focusing on identifying potential vulnerabilities in its key components, data flow, and deployment configuration. This includes analyzing the application's code, dependencies, and interactions with the target server. The goal is to provide actionable recommendations to improve the application's security posture.
Scope: The analysis will cover the following:
- The onboard application code (primarily app.py and associated HTML/templates).
- The Dockerfile and deployment configuration.
- The interaction between the onboard application and the target server's authorized_keys file.
- The identified dependencies (Flask, etc.).
- The assumptions and security controls outlined in the security design review.
Methodology:
1. Code Review: We will manually inspect the app.py file and other relevant code components to identify potential vulnerabilities, such as injection flaws, insecure file handling, and lack of input validation.
2. Dependency Analysis: We will examine the project's dependencies (listed in requirements.txt or inferred) for known vulnerabilities.
3. Deployment Configuration Review: We will analyze the Dockerfile and recommended deployment setup (Docker, reverse proxy) for security best practices.
4. Threat Modeling: We will use the information gathered from the previous steps to identify potential threats and attack vectors, considering the application's context and business risks.
5. Mitigation Recommendations: We will provide specific, actionable recommendations to address the identified vulnerabilities and threats.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of the key components, drawing inferences from the codebase and documentation:

app.py (Flask Application):
- Input Handling: This is the most critical area. app.py receives the username and SSH public key from the user. The code uses request.form['username'] and request.form['sshkey'] to access this data. The security of the entire application hinges on how this input is validated and sanitized. The original code does not perform sufficient validation. It only checks if the fields are not empty, which is inadequate.
- Command Execution: The application constructs a shell command using os.system() or a similar function (based on the code, it's likely os.system()). This is a major red flag and a potential source of command injection vulnerabilities. The username and SSH key are directly inserted into this command string. If an attacker can control either of these inputs, they can potentially execute arbitrary commands on the server.
- File Writing: The application writes the SSH key to the authorized_keys file. The security of this operation depends on the file permissions and the user context under which the application is running. The original code likely uses a hardcoded path, which is not ideal.
- Error Handling: The application's error handling needs to be reviewed. Improper error handling can leak sensitive information or lead to unexpected behavior.
- Lack of CSRF Protection: The application, as described, lacks CSRF protection. This means an attacker could trick a user into submitting the form and adding an attacker-controlled SSH key.
templates/index.html (HTML Form):
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): While less critical than command injection, the template needs to be checked for potential XSS vulnerabilities. If user input is not properly escaped when rendered in the template, an attacker could inject malicious JavaScript.
- Form Security: The form should ideally include a CSRF token to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
Dockerfile:
- Base Image: The Dockerfile specifies a base image (python:3.9-slim in the provided example). It's important to use a minimal, well-maintained base image to reduce the attack surface.
- User Context: The application should not run as the root user inside the container. The Dockerfile should specify a non-root user.
- Exposed Ports: The Dockerfile exposes port 80. This should be reviewed in the context of the deployment environment (e.g., a reverse proxy should handle TLS termination).
- Dependencies: The Dockerfile copies requirements.txt and installs dependencies. These dependencies need to be regularly scanned for vulnerabilities.
Deployment Configuration (Docker, Reverse Proxy, Shared Volume):
- Reverse Proxy (Nginx/Apache): A reverse proxy is essential for serving the application over HTTPS and providing additional security features (e.g., WAF, rate limiting). The reverse proxy configuration needs to be carefully reviewed.
- Shared Volume: The use of a shared volume to persist the authorized_keys file is a good practice, but the permissions on this volume need to be tightly controlled. Only the necessary user should have write access.
- Network Segmentation: The application and the target server should ideally be on separate networks, with appropriate firewall rules to restrict access.
- Load Balancer: If a load balancer is used, it should also be configured securely (HTTPS, WAF).
Dependencies (Flask, etc.):
- Flask: Flask itself is generally secure, but it's crucial to use a recent version and follow secure coding practices.
- Other Dependencies: Any other dependencies listed in requirements.txt need to be checked for known vulnerabilities.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

Based on the code and documentation, we can infer the following:

Architecture: Simple, single-page web application using the Flask framework. The application acts as a bridge between the user and the target server's authorized_keys file.
Components:
- Web Browser (User's machine)
- Web Server (Nginx/Apache) - Reverse Proxy
- onboard Application (Flask, app.py)
- Target Server (with SSH daemon and authorized_keys file)
- Shared Volume (for persistent authorized_keys storage)
Data Flow:
1. User enters username and SSH public key into the HTML form in their web browser.
2. The browser sends an HTTP POST request to the web server.
3. The web server (reverse proxy) terminates TLS and forwards the request to the onboard application.
4. The onboard application (app.py) receives the request, extracts the username and SSH key from the form data.
5. The application insecurely constructs a shell command using the user-provided input.
6. The application executes the shell command, which appends the SSH key to the authorized_keys file on the shared volume.
7. The application returns a response to the user (success or error).
8. The user can now SSH into the target server using their private key.

4. Specific Security Considerations (Tailored to onboard)

Critical Vulnerability: Command Injection: The most significant vulnerability is the potential for command injection in app.py. The application's use of os.system() (or similar) with unsanitized user input is a major security flaw. An attacker could inject arbitrary shell commands by manipulating the username or SSH key fields. For example, a malicious username like "; rm -rf /; could have disastrous consequences.
High Vulnerability: Lack of Input Validation: Beyond command injection, the application lacks robust input validation. It should strictly validate the format of the username and SSH key to prevent other types of attacks. For example, it should check that the SSH key starts with ssh-rsa, ecdsa-sha2-nistp256, ecdsa-sha2-nistp384, ecdsa-sha2-nistp521, ssh-ed25519, sk-ecdsa-sha2-nistp256@openssh.com, or sk-ssh-ed25519@openssh.com and contains valid base64-encoded data.
High Vulnerability: Missing CSRF Protection: The lack of CSRF protection makes the application vulnerable to cross-site request forgery attacks.
Medium Vulnerability: Insecure File Permissions: If the authorized_keys file or the shared volume has overly permissive permissions, it could allow unauthorized users to modify the file and gain access to the server.
Medium Vulnerability: Lack of Rate Limiting: The application is potentially vulnerable to brute-force attacks against the form submission.
Medium Vulnerability: Potential XSS: The HTML template needs to be carefully reviewed for potential XSS vulnerabilities.
Low Vulnerability: Dependency Vulnerabilities: Dependencies need to be regularly scanned and updated.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

Here are specific, actionable recommendations to address the identified vulnerabilities:

Eliminate Command Injection (Highest Priority):

Do not use os.system() or any other function that executes shell commands with user-supplied input.
Instead, use Python's built-in file I/O functions (open(), write()) to directly write the SSH key to the authorized_keys file. This eliminates the risk of command injection.

Example (Safe File Writing):

import os
import re
import subprocess

def add_ssh_key(username, ssh_key, authorized_keys_path='/home/user/.ssh/authorized_keys'):
    """Adds an SSH key to the authorized_keys file, safely.

    Args:
        username: The username.
        ssh_key: The SSH public key.
        authorized_keys_path: Path to authorized_keys.
    Returns:
        True on success, False on failure, and error message.
    """

    # Validate username (example - adjust regex as needed)
    if not re.match(r"^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$", username):
        return False, "Invalid username format."

    # Validate SSH key format (basic check)
    valid_key_prefixes = [
        "ssh-rsa", "ecdsa-sha2-nistp256", "ecdsa-sha2-nistp384",
        "ecdsa-sha2-nistp521", "ssh-ed25519",
        "sk-ecdsa-sha2-nistp256@openssh.com", "sk-ssh-ed25519@openssh.com"
    ]
    if not any(ssh_key.startswith(prefix) for prefix in valid_key_prefixes):
        return False, "Invalid SSH key format."

    # Ensure authorized_keys file exists and has correct permissions
    ssh_dir = os.path.dirname(authorized_keys_path)
    if not os.path.exists(ssh_dir):
        try:
            os.makedirs(ssh_dir, mode=0o700)  # Create directory with 700 permissions
        except OSError as e:
            return False, f"Error creating directory: {e}"
    if not os.path.exists(authorized_keys_path):
        try:
            open(authorized_keys_path, 'a').close() # Create file if it doesn't exist
            os.chmod(authorized_keys_path, 0o600) # Set 600 permissions
        except OSError as e:
            return False, f"Error creating authorized_keys file: {e}"
    else:
        try:
            current_permissions = stat.S_IMODE(os.stat(authorized_keys_path).st_mode)
            if current_permissions != 0o600:
                os.chmod(authorized_keys_path, 0o600) # Set 600 permissions
        except OSError as e:
            return False, f"Error setting permissions: {e}"

    # Append the key to the authorized_keys file
    try:
        with open(authorized_keys_path, "a") as f:
            f.write(f"{ssh_key} {username}\n")
        return True, ""
    except OSError as e:
        return False, f"Error writing to authorized_keys: {e}"

Implement Robust Input Validation:
- Use regular expressions or other validation techniques to ensure that the username and SSH key conform to expected formats.
- Reject any input that does not meet the validation criteria.
Add CSRF Protection:
- Use Flask's built-in CSRF protection features (e.g., flask_wtf.csrf.CSRFProtect) or a similar library.
- Include a CSRF token in the HTML form and validate it on the server side.
Implement Rate Limiting:
- Use a Flask extension like Flask-Limiter to limit the number of requests from a single IP address within a given time period.
Secure File Permissions:
- Ensure that the authorized_keys file and the shared volume have the correct permissions (e.g., 600 for authorized_keys, 700 for the directory).
- The application should run as a non-root user with the minimum necessary permissions to write to the authorized_keys file.
Secure the Dockerfile:
- Use a minimal base image.
- Specify a non-root user using the USER directive.
- Copy only the necessary files into the container.
Configure a Secure Reverse Proxy:
- Use a reverse proxy (Nginx, Apache) to handle TLS termination and serve the application over HTTPS.
- Configure the reverse proxy to forward the Host header correctly.
- Consider using a WAF (Web Application Firewall) in front of the reverse proxy.
Implement Comprehensive Logging:
- Log all actions performed within the application, including successful and failed attempts to add SSH keys.
- Log the username, IP address, timestamp, and any relevant details.
Regularly Update Dependencies:
- Use a tool like pip-audit or Dependabot to automatically scan for and update vulnerable dependencies.
Sanitize Output in Templates:
- Use Flask's escape() function (or Jinja2's auto-escaping feature) to prevent XSS vulnerabilities when rendering user input in the HTML template.
Content Security Policy (CSP):
- Implement a CSP to mitigate XSS and other code injection attacks.
Harden SSH Configuration:
- Although not directly related to the application, ensure the target server's SSH configuration (/etc/ssh/sshd_config) is hardened. Disable root login, use strong ciphers, and consider using AllowUsers or AllowGroups to restrict SSH access.

By implementing these mitigation strategies, the security posture of the onboard application can be significantly improved, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and other security breaches. The most crucial step is to eliminate the command injection vulnerability by using safe file I/O functions instead of shell commands.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

Files

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

Latest commit

History

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls