Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
20 lines (12 loc) · 3.36 KB

File metadata and controls

20 lines (12 loc) · 3.36 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for matthewyork/datetools

  • Description: Flaws in the internal logic of datetools's date and time calculation functions can lead to incorrect results. If your application relies on these calculations for security-sensitive operations or critical business logic, these errors can have significant consequences.

  • How datetools Contributes: If datetools contains logic errors within its functions for date arithmetic, comparisons, or time manipulations, any application using these flawed functions will inherit these vulnerabilities. The application's behavior will be directly affected by the correctness of datetools's internal calculations.

  • Example: An application uses datetools to calculate session expiry times. If a function within datetools used for adding time durations has a logic error (e.g., incorrect handling of month or year boundaries, leap year issues), session expiry times could be miscalculated. Critically, this could lead to sessions remaining active far longer than intended, effectively bypassing session timeout security controls and allowing unauthorized access. For example, if datetools incorrectly calculates adding a specific duration to a date, leading to session expiry being significantly delayed.

  • Impact: Security bypass (e.g., session management vulnerabilities, time-based access control failures), critical business logic errors, data integrity compromise if date calculations are used for data processing or validation.

  • Risk Severity: High

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Intensive Unit Testing Focused on datetools Logic: Develop a comprehensive suite of unit tests specifically targeting the date and time calculation functions within datetools itself, as used by your application. Test a wide range of inputs, including edge cases, boundary conditions (start/end of months, years, leap years), and different date/time ranges to uncover potential logic errors in datetools's implementation.
    • Code Review of Application's datetools Usage: Conduct thorough code reviews of all application code that utilizes datetools for date and time calculations. Focus on understanding how the application uses datetools functions and verify that the application logic correctly handles the expected behavior of datetools. Be aware that if datetools has internal flaws, the application logic might be unknowingly built upon incorrect assumptions.
    • Consider Alternative Libraries for Critical Logic (If Concerns Arise): If thorough testing reveals potential logic inconsistencies or concerns within datetools's calculation functions, and if date/time calculations are critical to your application's security or core functionality, consider evaluating and potentially migrating to more rigorously tested and widely vetted date/time libraries known for their accuracy and reliability, especially for security-sensitive applications.
    • Isolate datetools Usage: Where possible, isolate the use of datetools to specific modules or functions within your application. This can limit the potential impact if a vulnerability is discovered within datetools and makes it easier to replace or mitigate if needed.