Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
87 lines (68 loc) · 7.18 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

87 lines (68 loc) · 7.18 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for matthewyork/datetools

Mitigation Strategy: Explicit Format Specification in parse_date()

Description:

  1. Locate parse_date() Calls: Identify all instances in the codebase where datetools.parse_date() is called.
  2. Mandatory fmt Argument: Modify every call to datetools.parse_date() to always include the fmt argument. The value of fmt should be a string that exactly specifies the expected input date format (e.g., "%Y-%m-%d", "%m/%d/%Y"). Never omit the fmt argument, even if you believe datetools will correctly guess the format.
  3. Document Format: Clearly document the expected format string alongside each call to parse_date(). This improves code readability and maintainability.
  4. Wrapper Function (Optional): Consider creating a wrapper function around datetools.parse_date() that enforces the use of the fmt argument and potentially includes pre-parsing validation (although pre-parsing validation is technically a separate, though related, mitigation). This centralizes date parsing logic.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Ambiguous Date Parsing: (Severity: High) - Prevents misinterpretation of date strings by forcing datetools to use a specific, predefined format.

  • Impact:

    • Ambiguous Date Parsing: Risk significantly reduced. The library will only parse dates according to the explicitly provided format.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • (Example - Needs to be filled in by the development team)
    • Partially implemented in the user profile update endpoint (/api/user/profile), where the fmt argument is used with parse_date().

  • Missing Implementation:

    • (Example - Needs to be filled in by the development team)
    • Missing in the event scheduling module (/api/events), where parse_date() is used without the fmt argument.
    • Missing in the reporting module, where parse_date() is used without the fmt argument for URL parameter dates.

Mitigation Strategy: Fork and Maintain (or Isolate and Prepare for Replacement)

Description:

  1. Fork (If Necessary): If replacing datetools is not immediately feasible, and it's deemed essential to continue using it, fork the datetools repository on GitHub. This gives you control over the codebase.
  2. Address Known Issues: If there are any known issues or limitations in datetools that directly affect your application, address them in the forked version. This might involve:
    • Fixing bugs related to date calculations or parsing.
    • Adding more robust error handling.
    • Improving timezone support (though using pytz/zoneinfo directly is still recommended for timezone conversions).
  3. Isolate (Even with Forking): Whether you fork or not, isolate the usage of datetools (or your forked version) within a well-defined wrapper module or class. This has several benefits:
    • Centralized Control: All interactions with datetools go through this single point, making it easier to manage and modify.
    • Easier Replacement: If you decide to replace datetools later, you only need to modify the wrapper, not the entire codebase.
    • Custom Error Handling: The wrapper can implement custom error handling specific to how datetools is used in your application.
  4. Prepare for Replacement: Even with a fork, actively plan for the eventual replacement of datetools with a more actively maintained alternative. This includes:
    • Identifying a suitable replacement library (e.g., python-dateutil, arrow).
    • Developing a migration plan.
    • Using the alternative library for any new date/time functionality.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Reliance on Outdated Library: (Severity: High) - Mitigates the risk of using an unmaintained library by either taking control of the code (forking) or making it easier to replace.
    • Specific datetools Bugs (If Addressed): (Severity: Variable) - If the fork addresses specific bugs or limitations in datetools, this directly mitigates those issues.

  • Impact:

    • Reliance on Outdated Library: Risk significantly reduced (with forking and maintenance) or made easier to eliminate in the future (with isolation).
    • Specific datetools Bugs: Risk reduced or eliminated, depending on the specific bugs addressed.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • (Example - Needs to be filled in by the development team)
    • None. The application currently relies directly on the unmaintained datetools library without isolation or forking.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • (Example - Needs to be filled in by the development team)
    • No fork exists.
    • datetools is used directly throughout the codebase.
    • No replacement plan is in place.

Mitigation Strategy: Unit Tests Covering datetools Functions

Description:

  1. Identify datetools Usage: Identify all locations where any datetools function is used (not just parse_date()). This includes date calculations, formatting, and relative time functions.
  2. Targeted Test Cases: Create unit tests that specifically target the behavior of these datetools functions. These tests should:
    • Use a variety of valid and invalid inputs.
    • Cover edge cases relevant to the specific function (e.g., leap years for date calculations, different format strings for formatting).
    • Verify that the output of the datetools function is exactly as expected. Use the built-in datetime module (with pytz/zoneinfo if necessary) to generate the expected results for comparison. Do not rely on datetools itself to generate the expected values.
  3. Focus on datetools Behavior: The goal is to test how datetools behaves, not to test general date/time logic. Assume the underlying datetime module is correct.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Date Calculation Errors (within datetools): (Severity: Medium) - Detects errors specific to how datetools performs calculations.
    • Unexpected datetools Behavior: (Severity: Medium) - Catches any unexpected or undocumented behavior in datetools functions.

  • Impact:

    • Date Calculation Errors (within datetools): Risk reduced. The tests will reveal any inconsistencies or errors in datetools's calculations.
    • Unexpected datetools Behavior: Risk reduced. The tests will expose any deviations from the expected behavior.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • (Example - Needs to be filled in by the development team)
    • A few basic tests exist for datetools.add_days(), but they don't cover edge cases.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • (Example - Needs to be filled in by the development team)
    • No tests exist for other datetools functions (e.g., parse_date(), formatting functions).
    • Existing tests are not comprehensive and don't cover leap years, month-end transitions, or a wide range of inputs.