Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
125 lines (99 loc) · 12.2 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

125 lines (99 loc) · 12.2 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for mortimergoro/mgswipetablecell

Objective: Compromise application data and functionality by exploiting vulnerabilities related to the mgswipetablecell library.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application Data and Functionality (via mgswipetablecell)
└───(OR)─ Exploit Vulnerabilities in Swipe Actions
    └───(AND)─ **Malicious Action Definition by Developer** (Critical Node)
        └───(OR)─ **Insecure Action Handlers** (Critical Node) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            └─── **Execute Unintended Code** (Critical Node) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            └─── Data Exposure [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        └─── **Insufficient Input Validation in Action Parameters** (Critical Node) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            └─── Parameter Tampering [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            └─── **Injection Attacks** (Critical Node)
    └───(AND)─ Exploit State Management Issues in Swipe Cell
        └─── **Improper Handling of Cell Reuse and Swipe State** (Critical Node) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            └─── Reused cells retain swipe state, unintended action triggers [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    └───(AND)─ Memory Management Issues related to Swipe Actions (Less likely, but possible)
        └─── **Buffer Overflows** (Critical Node)
    └───(AND)─ Exploit Library-Specific Vulnerabilities (Hypothetical - requires code review of mgswipetablecell)
        └─── Vulnerabilities within mgswipetablecell Codebase
            └─── **Memory Safety Issues in Library** (Critical Node)

Attack Tree Path: 1. Malicious Action Definition by Developer (Critical Node)

  • Threat: This is the foundational critical node. The vulnerability stems from developers incorrectly or insecurely defining the actions associated with swipeable cells. If developers don't prioritize security during action definition, it opens the door to various exploits.
  • Impact: High. Incorrect action definition is the root cause for multiple high-risk paths, potentially leading to critical application compromise.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Emphasize secure coding training for developers, specifically focusing on swipe action implementation.
    • Implement mandatory security code reviews for all code related to swipe action definitions and handlers.
    • Establish clear security guidelines and best practices for defining swipe actions.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Insecure Action Handlers (Critical Node) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Threat: Action handlers are the code blocks executed when a swipe action is triggered. If these handlers are insecurely implemented, they become direct attack vectors.
  • Impact: Critical. Insecure action handlers can lead to code execution, data breaches, and privilege escalation.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Input Validation: Mandatory and rigorous input validation for all data used within action handlers, including cell data and user inputs.
    • Output Encoding: Properly encode outputs to prevent injection vulnerabilities (e.g., when constructing URLs or displaying data).
    • Authorization Checks: Implement robust authorization checks within action handlers to ensure users can only perform actions they are permitted to.
    • Secure Coding Practices: Avoid insecure functions, use parameterized queries for database interactions, and minimize dynamic code execution.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Execute Unintended Code (Critical Node) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Threat: This is a direct consequence of insecure action handlers. Attackers can manipulate the application to execute code they control within the context of the application. Examples include URL scheme abuse (executing malicious URLs) and script injection (if actions dynamically generate web content).
  • Impact: Critical. Code execution vulnerabilities are among the most severe, allowing attackers to completely compromise the application and potentially the user's device.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Prevent Dynamic Code Execution: Minimize or eliminate dynamic code execution within action handlers.
    • Strict URL Handling: Carefully validate and sanitize URLs opened by action handlers. Avoid constructing URLs from untrusted data.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): If actions involve displaying web content, implement a strong Content Security Policy to mitigate script injection risks.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Data Exposure [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Threat: Insecure action handlers might inadvertently expose sensitive data. This can occur through logging sensitive information, displaying it in action UI elements (like confirmation dialogs), or transmitting it insecurely.
  • Impact: Moderate to Significant. Data exposure can lead to privacy violations, reputational damage, and regulatory penalties.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Minimize Sensitive Data Handling: Reduce the amount of sensitive data processed and displayed in swipe actions.
    • Secure Logging Practices: Avoid logging sensitive data in action handlers. If logging is necessary, ensure data is anonymized or pseudonymized.
    • Secure Data Transmission: If action handlers transmit data, ensure it is done over secure channels (HTTPS) and with appropriate encryption.

Attack Tree Path: 5. Insufficient Input Validation in Action Parameters (Critical Node) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Threat: Swipe actions often rely on parameters (e.g., cell index, data identifiers). If these parameters are not properly validated by action handlers, attackers can manipulate them to perform unauthorized actions.
  • Impact: Moderate to Critical. Insufficient input validation can lead to parameter tampering, injection attacks, and privilege escalation.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Mandatory Parameter Validation: Implement strict validation for all action parameters, checking data types, ranges, and formats.
    • Sanitization: Sanitize parameters before using them in any operations, especially database queries or system commands.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure action handlers only perform actions authorized for the current user, regardless of parameter values.

Attack Tree Path: 6. Parameter Tampering [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Threat: Attackers exploit insufficient input validation to modify action parameters. While directly manipulating parameters passed from the library might be difficult, vulnerabilities arise from how the application uses these parameters. For example, manipulating cell indices to access out-of-bounds data.
  • Impact: Moderate. Parameter tampering can lead to unauthorized actions, data modification, or information disclosure.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Robust Parameter Validation (as mentioned above).
    • Defensive Programming: Implement defensive programming techniques to handle unexpected or invalid parameter values gracefully and securely.

Attack Tree Path: 7. Injection Attacks (Critical Node)

  • Threat: If action parameters are used to construct dynamic database queries, system commands, or other dynamic operations without proper sanitization, injection attacks become possible (e.g., SQL injection, command injection).
  • Impact: Critical. Injection attacks can allow attackers to execute arbitrary code, access or modify data, and potentially take control of the application's backend systems.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Parameterized Queries/Prepared Statements: Always use parameterized queries or prepared statements when interacting with databases to prevent SQL injection.
    • Avoid Dynamic Command Execution: Minimize or eliminate dynamic command execution based on action parameters. If necessary, rigorously sanitize and validate inputs.
    • Input Sanitization: Sanitize all inputs used in dynamic operations to remove or escape potentially malicious characters.

Attack Tree Path: 8. Improper Handling of Cell Reuse and Swipe State (Critical Node) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Threat: Table views reuse cells for performance. If the application doesn't properly manage the swipe state of reused cells, it can lead to unintended action triggers and data exposure.
  • Impact: Moderate. Cell reuse issues can cause unintended actions, user confusion, and potentially expose data from previous cells.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Reset Swipe State on Cell Reuse: Explicitly reset the swipe state of cells to a default closed state in tableView(_:cellForRowAt:) or prepareForReuse().
    • Clear Action UI on Cell Reuse: Clear any dynamic UI elements or data displayed in swipe actions when a cell is reused.
    • Unit Testing for Cell Reuse: Write unit tests to verify correct cell reuse behavior and state management, especially in scenarios involving swipe actions.

Attack Tree Path: 9. Reused cells retain swipe state, unintended action triggers [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Threat: A direct consequence of improper cell reuse handling. Reused cells might retain the swipe state (actions revealed) from a previous cell, leading to actions being triggered on the wrong cell or at the wrong time.
  • Impact: Moderate. Unintended action triggers can lead to data corruption, incorrect operations, and user frustration.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Implement Actionable Insights from "Improper Handling of Cell Reuse and Swipe State" (above).
    • Thorough Testing: Test swipe actions extensively in scenarios involving scrolling, cell reuse, and dynamic data updates to identify and fix state management issues.

Attack Tree Path: 10. Buffer Overflows (Critical Node)

  • Threat: While less likely in modern Swift/Objective-C with ARC, buffer overflows are theoretically possible, especially if action handlers involve unsafe operations or interact with C/C++ code.
  • Impact: Critical. Exploitable buffer overflows can lead to code execution and complete system compromise.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Avoid Unsafe Operations: Minimize or eliminate unsafe operations in action handlers.
    • Safe String Handling: Use safe string handling functions and avoid manual buffer manipulation.
    • Code Review (C/C++ Code): If C/C++ code is used, conduct rigorous code reviews for memory safety vulnerabilities.
    • Memory Safety Tools: Utilize memory safety analysis tools during development and testing.

Attack Tree Path: 11. Memory Safety Issues in Library (Critical Node)

  • Threat: Hypothetically, vulnerabilities within the mgswipetablecell library itself could include memory safety issues if the library is not using ARC properly or contains unsafe code.
  • Impact: Critical. Memory safety issues in the library could lead to memory corruption, crashes, and potentially exploitable vulnerabilities like buffer overflows.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Library Code Review (if feasible): If possible and resources permit, conduct a security-focused code review of the mgswipetablecell library.
    • Memory Profiling: Monitor the application's memory usage when using the library to detect potential memory leaks or issues.
    • Stay Updated: Keep the library updated to the latest version to benefit from bug fixes and potential security patches.