Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
125 lines (91 loc) · 12.9 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

125 lines (91 loc) · 12.9 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of the MMDrawerController project based on the provided Security Design Review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the MMDrawerController library, focusing on identifying potential vulnerabilities and providing actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will cover key components, data flow, and interactions with the hosting iOS application. We aim to identify risks specific to the library's functionality and its integration into a larger application.

  • Scope:

    • The MMDrawerController library itself, including its source code (available on GitHub), documentation, and intended usage.
    • The interaction between MMDrawerController and the hosting iOS application.
    • The library's dependencies (if any) and their potential security implications.
    • Common attack vectors relevant to iOS UI components and libraries.
    • We will not cover the security of the hosting application itself, except where MMDrawerController's behavior directly impacts it.

  • Methodology:

    1. Code Review (Static Analysis): We will examine the provided design documents and infer potential vulnerabilities based on the described architecture and common iOS security pitfalls. We will also consider the information available on the GitHub repository (though we won't perform a full line-by-line code review here).
    2. Architecture Analysis: We will analyze the C4 diagrams and component descriptions to understand the data flow and control flow within the library and its interaction with the hosting application.
    3. Threat Modeling: We will identify potential threats based on the library's functionality and the identified attack surface.
    4. Vulnerability Assessment: We will assess the likelihood and impact of identified threats.
    5. Mitigation Recommendations: We will provide specific, actionable recommendations to mitigate identified vulnerabilities.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the C4 diagrams and descriptions, here's a breakdown of the security implications of the key components:

  • MMDrawerController (Main Component):

    • Responsibilities: Manages the presentation and animation of the drawer, handles user interaction (gestures, taps), and manages the lifecycle of the center, left, and right view controllers.
    • Security Implications:
      • Gesture Handling: Incorrectly handled gestures could potentially lead to unexpected application states or denial of service (e.g., rapid, repeated gestures causing the app to freeze). While unlikely to be a critical vulnerability, it could impact usability.
      • View Controller Lifecycle: Improper management of view controller lifecycles could lead to memory leaks or, in rare cases, use-after-free vulnerabilities if objects are accessed after they've been deallocated.
      • Data Passing (Indirect): While MMDrawerController doesn't directly handle sensitive data, it does manage the view controllers that might. If the hosting application passes data between the center and drawer view controllers through MMDrawerController (e.g., via custom properties or methods), there's a (small) risk of data exposure if not handled carefully. This is primarily the responsibility of the hosting application, but MMDrawerController should avoid making assumptions about the data it's indirectly managing.
      • Customization Options: The library likely offers customization options (e.g., animation speed, drawer width, appearance). If these options are exposed via public APIs and accept user-provided values, they need to be carefully validated to prevent injection attacks or other unexpected behavior.

  • CenterViewController, LeftDrawerViewController, RightDrawerViewController:

    • Responsibilities: These are provided by the hosting application, not part of MMDrawerController itself. They display the actual content.
    • Security Implications: These are entirely the responsibility of the hosting application. MMDrawerController simply displays them. Any vulnerabilities here (e.g., XSS in a web view, SQL injection in a database-backed view) are outside the scope of the library's security.

  • iOS Application (Hosting Application):

    • Responsibilities: Everything except the drawer's presentation and animation. This includes authentication, authorization, data handling, network communication, etc.
    • Security Implications: The hosting application bears the primary responsibility for security. MMDrawerController is just one small component. The application must:
      • Properly validate all user input.
      • Securely handle any sensitive data displayed in the drawer or center view controllers.
      • Use secure communication channels (HTTPS) for any network requests.
      • Implement appropriate authentication and authorization mechanisms.

  • External Systems:

    • Responsibilities: APIs, backend services, etc., that the hosting application interacts with.
    • Security Implications: Completely outside the scope of MMDrawerController. The hosting application must ensure secure communication with these systems.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

Based on the documentation and common patterns for drawer controllers, we can infer the following:

  • Architecture: MMDrawerController likely uses a container view controller architecture. It acts as a parent view controller that manages the center, left, and right child view controllers. It likely uses gesture recognizers to detect swipe gestures and animates the drawer's presentation accordingly.

  • Components:

    • MMDrawerController: The main class, a subclass of UIViewController.
    • Gesture Recognizers: Likely UIPanGestureRecognizer for handling swipes.
    • Animation Engine: Uses Core Animation or UIKit Dynamics for smooth drawer animations.
    • Internal State Management: Variables to track the drawer's state (open/closed, position), animation progress, etc.

  • Data Flow:

    1. User Interaction: The user interacts with the application, typically by swiping on the screen.
    2. Gesture Recognition: The UIPanGestureRecognizer detects the swipe gesture.
    3. Event Handling: MMDrawerController receives the gesture events and updates its internal state.
    4. Animation: MMDrawerController uses Core Animation or UIKit Dynamics to animate the drawer's movement.
    5. View Controller Management: MMDrawerController manages the visibility and layout of the center, left, and right view controllers.
    6. Data Display (Indirect): The content of the drawers is managed by the hosting application's view controllers. MMDrawerController simply presents these view controllers.
    7. Delegation (Potentially): MMDrawerController might use delegation to notify the hosting application of events like the drawer opening or closing. This is a potential point of interaction where data could be passed.

4. Security Considerations (Tailored to MMDrawerController)

  • Denial of Service (DoS) via Gesture Handling: A malicious user might be able to trigger excessive animations or state changes by rapidly swiping, potentially leading to UI unresponsiveness or even a crash. This is a low-severity risk, but worth considering.

  • Memory Management Issues: Incorrect handling of view controller lifecycles or animation callbacks could lead to memory leaks. While unlikely to be a security vulnerability in most cases, it can impact performance and stability.

  • Improper State Handling: If the internal state of the drawer (open/closed, position) is not managed correctly, it could lead to unexpected UI behavior or, in very rare cases, potentially exploitable conditions. This is a low-likelihood risk.

  • Dependency Vulnerabilities: If MMDrawerController uses any external dependencies (even small ones), those dependencies could introduce vulnerabilities. This is a common risk for any library.

  • Unvalidated Customization Options: If the library exposes customization options (e.g., animation duration, drawer width) via public APIs, and these options accept user-provided values, those values must be validated. For example, an excessively large drawer width could lead to layout issues or even crashes. An extremely long animation duration could make the UI unresponsive.

  • Data Leakage through Delegation (Low Risk): If MMDrawerController uses delegation to communicate with the hosting application, and if the hosting application inadvertently passes sensitive data through these delegate methods, that data could be exposed if a malicious actor were to swizzle (replace) those methods. This is primarily the responsibility of the hosting application, but MMDrawerController should be designed to minimize the need for passing data through delegate methods.

  • Information Disclosure through Logging: If MMDrawerController includes any logging statements (for debugging purposes), it's crucial to ensure that these logs never contain sensitive information. This is a general best practice, but worth reiterating.

5. Mitigation Strategies (Actionable and Tailored)

  • DoS Mitigation:

    • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting for gesture handling. Limit the number of drawer open/close events that can be processed within a given time frame. This prevents rapid swiping from overwhelming the UI.
    • Debouncing: Use debouncing techniques to ignore rapid, successive gesture events that are likely unintentional.

  • Memory Management:

    • Thorough Testing: Use Xcode's Instruments (Leaks, Allocations) to profile the library and identify any memory leaks or retain cycles.
    • Careful View Controller Lifecycle Management: Ensure that view controllers are properly added and removed as child view controllers, and that their lifecycle methods are called correctly.

  • State Handling:

    • Robust State Machine: Implement a clear and well-defined state machine to manage the drawer's state. This makes the behavior more predictable and reduces the risk of unexpected states.
    • Unit Tests: Write unit tests to verify the correct behavior of the state machine under various conditions.

  • Dependency Management:

    • Minimize Dependencies: Strive to keep the number of external dependencies to an absolute minimum. This reduces the attack surface.
    • Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Integrate an SCA tool (e.g., OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk) into the build process to automatically scan for known vulnerabilities in dependencies. This should be a continuous process.
    • Regular Updates: Keep dependencies up to date to patch any known vulnerabilities.

  • Input Validation (for Customization Options):

    • Strict Validation: Validate all user-provided values for customization options. For example:
      • animationDuration: Ensure it's a positive number within a reasonable range (e.g., 0.1 to 2.0 seconds).
      • drawerWidth: Ensure it's a positive number less than or equal to the screen width.
      • Any other customizable parameters: Apply appropriate validation based on the data type and expected range.
    • Default Values: Provide safe default values for all customization options.

  • Data Leakage Prevention (Delegation):

    • Minimize Data Passing: Design the delegate methods to pass only the minimum necessary information. Avoid passing entire data objects if only a small piece of data is needed.
    • Documentation: Clearly document the purpose of each delegate method and the data it passes. Warn developers about the potential risks of passing sensitive data.

  • Information Disclosure Prevention:

    • Review Logging: Carefully review all logging statements to ensure they don't contain any sensitive information. Remove or redact any potentially sensitive data. Consider using a logging framework that allows for different log levels (e.g., debug, info, error) and disable debug logging in production builds.

  • Security Reporting Process:

    • Vulnerability Disclosure Policy: Create a clear and easy-to-find vulnerability disclosure policy (e.g., a SECURITY.md file in the GitHub repository). This encourages responsible disclosure of security issues.

  • Fuzz Testing:

    • While less common for UI components, consider using a UI fuzzing tool to test the gesture handling and other input points. This can help identify unexpected edge cases and crashes.

By implementing these mitigation strategies, the MMDrawerController project can significantly reduce its risk profile and provide a more secure and reliable component for iOS developers. Remember that security is an ongoing process, and regular reviews and updates are essential.