Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
193 lines (162 loc) · 16.2 KB

File metadata and controls

193 lines (162 loc) · 16.2 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of the mwphotobrowser project based on the provided design review and the GitHub repository (https://github.com/mwaterfall/mwphotobrowser).

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the mwphotobrowser application, focusing on identifying vulnerabilities in its key components, data flow, and architecture. The analysis will prioritize practical threats relevant to the project's stated goals (simple, self-hosted photo browsing) and provide actionable mitigation strategies. We aim to identify weaknesses that could lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, or denial of service.
  • Scope: The analysis will cover the following:
    • The Python application code (app.py and any related files).
    • The Flask web framework configuration (implicit and explicit).
    • The interaction with the file system.
    • The authentication mechanism (HTTP Basic Auth).
    • The proposed deployment model (WSGI server + reverse proxy).
    • The build process (as described in the design document).
    • Third-party dependencies declared.
  • Methodology:
    1. Code Review: We will manually examine the app.py code for common security vulnerabilities, focusing on input validation, authentication, authorization, and file system interactions.
    2. Architecture Review: We will analyze the C4 diagrams and deployment model to understand the data flow and identify potential attack surfaces.
    3. Dependency Analysis: We will examine the project's dependencies (Flask, and potentially others listed in a requirements.txt file if one exists) for known vulnerabilities.
    4. Threat Modeling: We will consider common attack vectors against web applications and assess their applicability to mwphotobrowser.
    5. Mitigation Recommendations: For each identified vulnerability, we will provide specific, actionable steps to mitigate the risk.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component, referencing the design document and inferring from the codebase:

  • app.py (Python Application):

    • Authentication (Basic Auth): As noted, Basic Auth is inherently insecure without HTTPS. It sends credentials in Base64 encoding (easily decoded) with every request. This is a major vulnerability. The code uses hardcoded credentials (USERNAME and PASSWORD in app.py), which is extremely bad practice. Changing these requires modifying the source code.
    • File System Access: The application directly interacts with the file system based on user input (the directory path). This is the most critical area for security vulnerabilities. The code must rigorously validate and sanitize the requested path to prevent path traversal attacks (e.g., ../../etc/passwd). The design document correctly identifies this as a major accepted risk. We need to see the code to confirm if any validation is present. Even if validation exists, it needs careful scrutiny.
    • Read-Only Access: The design document states the application is read-only. We need to verify this in the code. Are there any routes or functions that could potentially write to the file system, even indirectly (e.g., creating temporary files, logging)?
    • Error Handling: How does the application handle errors? Does it reveal sensitive information in error messages (e.g., stack traces, file paths)? This could aid an attacker.
    • Template Rendering: The application likely uses Flask's templating engine (Jinja2). While Jinja2 auto-escapes output by default, we need to check if there are any uses of the | safe filter, which disables auto-escaping and could introduce Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. While XSS is less critical in a read-only photo browser, it's still a potential issue.
  • Flask Web Server:

    • Development Server: The design document correctly points out that the Flask development server is not suitable for production. It's not designed for security or performance.
    • Configuration: Are there any Flask configuration settings that impact security (e.g., SECRET_KEY)? The SECRET_KEY is crucial for session management (if sessions were used, which they aren't currently) and CSRF protection (also not currently implemented). Even though sessions aren't used, a weak or default SECRET_KEY could be a vulnerability if the application is extended in the future.
    • Implicit Security Features: Flask provides some built-in security features (e.g., auto-escaping in Jinja2, some protection against common web vulnerabilities). We need to ensure these are not inadvertently disabled.
  • WSGI Server (Gunicorn) and Reverse Proxy (Nginx):

    • HTTPS Termination: The reverse proxy (Nginx) is crucial for providing HTTPS. This is the primary mitigation for the Basic Auth vulnerability. The Nginx configuration needs to be carefully reviewed to ensure it's correctly configured for HTTPS, using strong ciphers and protocols.
    • Rate Limiting: Nginx can be configured to implement rate limiting, preventing brute-force attacks against the Basic Auth. This is a highly recommended configuration.
    • Request Filtering: Nginx can also be used to filter requests, blocking malicious traffic before it reaches the application. This could include blocking requests with suspicious paths or headers.
    • Static File Serving: Nginx should be configured to serve static files (CSS, JavaScript, images) directly, improving performance and reducing the load on the application server.
    • Gunicorn Configuration: Gunicorn should be configured to run with limited privileges (not as root) and with an appropriate number of worker processes.
  • File System:

    • Permissions: The design document correctly emphasizes the importance of file system permissions. The photos directory and its subdirectories should be readable only by the user account under which the application runs. Write access should be strictly limited.
    • Sensitive Files: Are there any sensitive files (e.g., configuration files, .htpasswd files) stored within the photo directory or its parent directories? These should be protected with appropriate permissions.
  • Build Process (GitHub Actions):

    • Dependency Management: The design document recommends using a requirements.txt file and tools like pip-audit. This is essential for identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities in third-party libraries.
    • Static Analysis: The use of linters and security scanners (e.g., bandit, semgrep) is highly recommended to catch potential vulnerabilities early in the development process.
    • Least Privilege: The build process should run with minimal privileges. The GitHub Actions workflow should not have unnecessary access to the production environment.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

Based on the design document and the likely structure of a Flask application, we can infer the following:

  1. User Request: The user's browser sends an HTTP request to the server (ideally, via HTTPS to the Nginx reverse proxy).
  2. Reverse Proxy (Nginx): Nginx handles the HTTPS connection, decrypts the request, and forwards it to the Gunicorn WSGI server. Nginx may also perform rate limiting and request filtering.
  3. WSGI Server (Gunicorn): Gunicorn receives the request and passes it to the Flask application (app.py).
  4. Flask Application (app.py):
    • Authentication: The application checks the Authorization header for Basic Auth credentials.
    • Route Handling: The request is routed to the appropriate handler function based on the URL path.
    • File System Interaction: The handler function likely constructs a file system path based on the URL and user input. This is the critical point for path traversal vulnerabilities.
    • Template Rendering: The application reads the photo data and renders an HTML template using Jinja2.
    • Response: The rendered HTML is sent back to the user.
  5. File System: The file system provides the photo files and metadata.

4. Specific Security Considerations (Tailored to mwphotobrowser)

  • Path Traversal is the #1 Priority: The application must prevent path traversal attacks. This is the most likely and most dangerous vulnerability. The code needs to sanitize the user-provided directory path before accessing the file system. This should involve:
    • Normalization: Converting the path to a canonical form (e.g., resolving .. and symbolic links).
    • Whitelist Validation: Ideally, the application should have a whitelist of allowed directories and reject any path that doesn't match.
    • Blacklist Validation: If a whitelist is not feasible, the application should at least blacklist known dangerous characters and sequences (e.g., .., /, \). However, blacklisting is generally less secure than whitelisting.
    • Chroot Jail (Optional): For an extra layer of security, the application could be run in a chroot jail, limiting its access to a specific directory tree.
  • HTTPS is Mandatory: Basic Auth without HTTPS is unacceptable. The deployment must use HTTPS, and the application should redirect HTTP requests to HTTPS.
  • Hardcoded Credentials: The hardcoded username and password in app.py must be removed. At a minimum, these should be read from environment variables or a configuration file. Ideally, a more robust authentication mechanism (e.g., using a database or an external authentication provider) should be considered, but this may be out of scope for a simple project.
  • Rate Limiting: Nginx should be configured to limit the rate of authentication attempts to prevent brute-force attacks.
  • Dependency Management: A requirements.txt file should be used to manage dependencies, and tools like pip-audit should be used to scan for vulnerabilities.
  • Error Handling: The application should not reveal sensitive information in error messages. Custom error pages should be used.
  • Least Privilege: The application should run with the least privileges necessary. It should not run as root.
  • File System Permissions: The photo directory should be readable only by the application's user account.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Tailored to mwphotobrowser)

Here's a prioritized list of actionable mitigation strategies:

  1. IMMEDIATE (Critical):

    • Implement HTTPS: Configure Nginx (or another reverse proxy) to handle HTTPS termination. Obtain a TLS certificate (Let's Encrypt is a good option). Configure the application to redirect HTTP requests to HTTPS.

    • Remove Hardcoded Credentials: Remove the USERNAME and PASSWORD variables from app.py. Read these values from environment variables. For example:

      import os
      USERNAME = os.environ.get('PHOTO_USERNAME')
      PASSWORD = os.environ.get('PHOTO_PASSWORD')

      Then, set these environment variables in the server's configuration (e.g., in a .env file or in the systemd service file).

    • Implement Path Traversal Prevention: Add code to app.py to sanitize the user-provided directory path before accessing the file system. Here's an example using a whitelist approach (assuming the photos are stored in a directory called photos):

      import os
      import functools
      from flask import Flask, render_template, request, abort, send_from_directory
      
      app = Flask(__name__)
      
      # ... (rest of your code) ...
      PHOTO_BASE_DIR = "/path/to/your/photos"  # Set this to the absolute path
      
      def validate_path(func):
          @functools.wraps(func)
          def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
              if 'path' in kwargs:
                  requested_path = kwargs['path']
                  # Normalize the path
                  normalized_path = os.path.normpath(os.path.join(PHOTO_BASE_DIR, requested_path))
      
                  # Check if the normalized path is within the allowed base directory
                  if not normalized_path.startswith(PHOTO_BASE_DIR):
                      abort(403)  # Forbidden
      
                  kwargs['path'] = normalized_path # Pass normalized and checked path
              return func(*args, **kwargs)
          return wrapper
      
      @app.route('/')
      @app.route('/<path:path>')
      @requires_auth
      @validate_path # Apply to the routes
      def index(path=""):
          # ... (rest of your index function) ...
          # Use send_from_directory with checked path
          return send_from_directory(os.path.dirname(path), os.path.basename(path))
    • Rate Limiting (Nginx):

      # In your nginx.conf (http context):
      limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=auth_limit:10m rate=1r/s;
      
      # In your server block (location context for the application):
      location / {
          limit_req zone=auth_limit burst=5 nodelay;
          # ... (rest of your Nginx configuration) ...
      }

      This configuration limits requests to 1 per second, with a burst of 5 allowed. Adjust these values as needed.

  2. HIGH PRIORITY:

    • Dependency Management: Create a requirements.txt file listing all project dependencies (Flask, etc.) with pinned versions. Use pip-audit to scan for vulnerabilities:
      pip install pip-audit
      pip-audit -r requirements.txt
      Integrate this into your build process (GitHub Actions).
    • Static Analysis (GitHub Actions): Add a GitHub Actions workflow to run flake8 and bandit:
      # .github/workflows/ci.yml
      name: CI
      
      on: [push, pull_request]
      
      jobs:
        build:
          runs-on: ubuntu-latest
          steps:
            - uses: actions/checkout@v3
            - name: Set up Python
              uses: actions/setup-python@v4
              with:
                python-version: '3.x' # Replace with your Python version
            - name: Install dependencies
              run: |
                python -m pip install --upgrade pip
                pip install flake8 bandit
                if [ -f requirements.txt ]; then pip install -r requirements.txt; fi
            - name: Lint with flake8
              run: |
                flake8 . --count --select=E9,F63,F7,F82 --show-source --statistics
                flake8 . --count --exit-zero --max-complexity=10 --max-line-length=127 --statistics
            - name: Security audit with bandit
              run: |
                bandit -r .
    • Custom Error Pages: Create custom error pages (e.g., for 403 Forbidden, 404 Not Found, 500 Internal Server Error) to avoid revealing sensitive information. Use Flask's @app.errorhandler decorator.
  3. MEDIUM PRIORITY:

    • Consider Alternative Authentication: While Basic Auth + HTTPS + Rate Limiting is minimally acceptable for a very simple, low-risk deployment, explore alternatives if possible. Options include:
      • Flask-Login: Provides more robust session-based authentication.
      • Authlib: A more comprehensive library for various authentication protocols (OAuth, OpenID Connect).
      • External Authentication Provider: If appropriate, consider using an external authentication provider (e.g., Google Sign-In, GitHub OAuth).
    • Security Headers: Add security headers (e.g., Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to your responses. This can be done in Nginx or in the Flask application.
    • Logging: Implement basic logging to record access attempts and errors. This can help with debugging and security auditing.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for the mwphotobrowser project, along with specific, actionable steps to improve its security posture. The most critical vulnerabilities are related to path traversal and the use of Basic Auth without HTTPS. Addressing these issues should be the top priority.