Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
91 lines (66 loc) · 75.3 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

91 lines (66 loc) · 75.3 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Realm Swift

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security review of the Realm Swift mobile database library. This analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities, weaknesses, and risks associated with the library's design, architecture, and implementation, based on the provided security design review document and inferred understanding of the Realm Swift project. The analysis will focus on the security implications for applications integrating Realm Swift and provide actionable, Realm Swift-specific recommendations and mitigation strategies to enhance the overall security posture.

Scope:

This analysis is scoped to the Realm Swift library as described in the provided security design review document and the publicly available information about the project (primarily inferred from the design review itself). The scope includes:

  • Realm Swift Library Core Functionality: Analysis of data storage, retrieval, querying, and authorization mechanisms provided by Realm Swift.
  • Integration with Mobile Applications: Examination of how developers integrate Realm Swift into iOS and macOS applications and the security responsibilities at the application level.
  • Interaction with the Operating System: Assessment of Realm Swift's reliance on OS-level security features and potential vulnerabilities arising from this interaction.
  • Build and Release Process: Review of the build pipeline for Realm Swift and associated supply chain security considerations.
  • Identified Security Controls and Requirements: Evaluation of existing and recommended security controls outlined in the security design review.

The scope explicitly excludes:

  • Detailed Source Code Audit: This analysis is based on the design review and inferred architecture, not a line-by-line code audit.
  • Security Analysis of Realm Cloud or Synchronization Services: While synchronization is mentioned as a potential use case, this analysis focuses solely on the Realm Swift library for local data persistence.
  • Performance Benchmarking: Performance considerations are only addressed in the context of their potential impact on security (e.g., denial of service).
  • Legal or Compliance Aspects: This analysis is purely technical security-focused.

Methodology:

This deep analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Document Review: Thorough review of the provided security design review document, including business and security posture, design diagrams (C4 Context, Container, Deployment, Build), risk assessment, and questions/assumptions.
  2. Architecture and Data Flow Inference: Based on the design review and general knowledge of mobile database libraries, infer the high-level architecture, key components, and data flow within Realm Swift and its interaction with applications and the operating system.
  3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential security threats and vulnerabilities relevant to each component and data flow, considering common mobile database security risks and the specific characteristics of Realm Swift as described.
  4. Security Control Analysis: Evaluate the effectiveness of existing and recommended security controls in mitigating identified threats.
  5. Gap Analysis: Identify gaps in security controls and areas where improvements are needed.
  6. Recommendation and Mitigation Strategy Development: Formulate specific, actionable, and tailored security recommendations and mitigation strategies for Realm Swift and developers using it, addressing the identified threats and gaps.
  7. Documentation and Reporting: Document the findings, analysis, recommendations, and mitigation strategies in a structured report (this document).

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the design review, we can break down the security implications of key components as follows:

2.1. Realm Swift Library:

  • Security Responsibility: Core database functionality, data persistence, Realm-level authorization.
  • Inferred Architecture & Data Flow: In-process library integrated into the mobile application. Manages data in files on the OS file system via OS APIs. Provides an API for applications to interact with the database. Implements a permission system for Realm objects.
  • Security Implications:
    • Data Storage Vulnerabilities: Bugs in data handling, storage, or retrieval logic could lead to data corruption, data leakage, or denial of service.
    • Authorization Bypass: Vulnerabilities in the Realm-level permission system could allow unauthorized access to data within the Realm database.
    • Memory Safety Issues: As an in-process library, memory corruption vulnerabilities (e.g., buffer overflows, use-after-free) in Realm Swift could compromise the entire application process.
    • Input Validation within Realm: While developers are responsible for application-level input validation, Realm Swift itself must handle data parsing and processing securely. Lack of internal input validation could lead to vulnerabilities if malicious data is somehow introduced.
    • Denial of Service: Resource exhaustion vulnerabilities within Realm Swift (e.g., excessive memory usage, CPU consumption during queries) could lead to application crashes or performance degradation.
    • Encryption Management: Reliance on OS-level encryption means Realm Swift itself doesn't directly manage encryption keys. This can be a limitation for applications requiring more granular control over encryption.

2.2. Mobile Application Code:

  • Security Responsibility: Application logic, user authentication, application-level authorization, input validation, secure usage of Realm Swift API.
  • Inferred Architecture & Data Flow: Application code interacts with the Realm Swift library API to perform database operations.
  • Security Implications:
    • Insecure API Usage: Developers might misuse the Realm Swift API in ways that introduce security vulnerabilities (e.g., improper query construction leading to data leakage, ignoring Realm permissions).
    • Lack of Input Validation: Failure to validate user inputs before storing them in Realm can lead to injection attacks (though less direct than SQL injection, still potential for data corruption or unexpected behavior) and data integrity issues.
    • Insufficient Authentication and Authorization: If application-level authentication and authorization are weak or missing, attackers could bypass application security and potentially access or manipulate data in Realm.
    • Data Exposure through Application Logic: Vulnerabilities in application logic could inadvertently expose sensitive data stored in Realm (e.g., logging sensitive data, insecure data sharing).

2.3. Operating System (iOS/macOS) & File System:

  • Security Responsibility: Data storage, file system permissions, OS-level encryption, process isolation.
  • Inferred Architecture & Data Flow: Realm Swift uses OS File System APIs to store database files in the file system.
  • Security Implications:
    • Reliance on OS Security: Realm Swift's security is heavily reliant on the underlying OS security features. Vulnerabilities in the OS or misconfigurations could directly impact Realm Swift's data security.
    • File System Permissions Misconfiguration: Incorrect file system permissions on Realm database files could allow unauthorized access by other applications or processes on the device.
    • OS-Level Encryption Limitations: While OS-level encryption provides encryption at rest, it might not meet the requirements of all applications. For example, if the device is unlocked, the data is accessible. Also, key management is entirely OS-controlled.
    • Data Leakage through File System: If not properly managed, temporary files or backups created by Realm Swift or the OS could potentially expose sensitive data.

2.4. Build Process:

  • Security Responsibility: Ensuring the integrity and security of the Realm Swift library build artifacts and preventing supply chain attacks.
  • Inferred Architecture & Data Flow: Source code from GitHub is built using CI/CD, potentially using dependencies from package repositories. Build artifacts are then distributed.
  • Security Implications:
    • Compromised Dependencies: Vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies used by Realm Swift could be exploited to compromise the library.
    • Build Environment Compromise: If the CI/CD build environment is compromised, attackers could inject malicious code into the Realm Swift library.
    • Lack of Build Artifact Integrity: Without proper signing and verification, users might unknowingly use tampered or malicious versions of the Realm Swift library.
    • Vulnerabilities in Build Tools: Security vulnerabilities in the build tools (Swift Package Manager, Xcode Build) could be exploited during the build process.
    • Exposure of Build Artifacts: Insecure storage or distribution of build artifacts could lead to unauthorized access or modification.

3. Specific Security Recommendations and Mitigation Strategies

Based on the identified security implications, here are specific and actionable security recommendations and mitigation strategies tailored to Realm Swift:

3.1. Realm Swift Library Security Enhancements:

| Identified Threat/Security Implication | Specific Recommendation