Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
152 lines (125 loc) · 166 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

152 lines (125 loc) · 166 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of Realm Swift based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: The objective of this deep analysis is to thoroughly examine the security posture of Realm Swift, focusing on its key components, data flows, and interactions with the operating system and other parts of the MongoDB Realm ecosystem. The analysis aims to identify potential vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies. We will pay particular attention to the interaction between Realm Swift (the Swift bindings), the Realm Core Database (C++), and the iOS/macOS security mechanisms.

  • Scope: This analysis covers:

    • Realm Swift library (primarily focusing on the Swift code).
    • Interaction with the Realm Core Database (C++).
    • Data storage and retrieval mechanisms.
    • Encryption at rest (implementation and key management).
    • File system interactions and permissions.
    • Dependency management (Swift Package Manager).
    • Build process security.
    • Deployment model (standard iOS/macOS application).
    • Interaction with iOS/macOS security features (Keychain, sandboxing).
    • Excludes: MongoDB Atlas Device Sync and MongoDB Atlas are outside the direct scope of this analysis, although their security implications for a Realm Swift application are briefly considered. A separate, dedicated analysis would be needed for those components. We also do not deeply analyze the C++ core, but we consider its interaction with Swift.

  • Methodology:

    1. Code Review (Inferred): While we don't have direct access to modify the Realm Swift codebase, we will infer the architecture and security-relevant code paths based on the provided design document, public documentation, and the open-source nature of the project (allowing us to examine the GitHub repository).
    2. Threat Modeling: We will identify potential threats based on the identified components, data flows, and trust boundaries. We'll use a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and attack trees to systematically analyze threats.
    3. Vulnerability Analysis: We will analyze potential vulnerabilities arising from the identified threats, considering both common mobile application vulnerabilities and Realm-specific issues.
    4. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: For each identified vulnerability, we will propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies that are tailored to Realm Swift and the iOS/macOS environment.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of the key components identified in the C4 diagrams and the security design review:

  • Realm Swift API (Swift):

    • Threats:
      • Injection Attacks: If user-provided data is used to construct Realm queries without proper sanitization, it could lead to injection attacks, potentially allowing attackers to read, modify, or delete data they shouldn't have access to. This is particularly relevant to the NSPredicate based queries.
      • Type Confusion: Incorrect handling of object types or schema migrations could lead to type confusion vulnerabilities, potentially causing crashes or unexpected behavior.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Extremely large queries or transactions could consume excessive resources, leading to a denial of service.
      • Improper Error Handling: Insufficiently handled errors could leak sensitive information or lead to unexpected application states.
    • Mitigation:
      • Parameterized Queries: Strongly recommend and document the use of parameterized queries (using %@ placeholders in NSPredicate) to prevent injection attacks. Realm's documentation should explicitly warn against string concatenation for query construction. Provide clear examples.
      • Schema Validation: Enforce strict schema validation at runtime to prevent type confusion issues. Thoroughly test schema migration processes.
      • Resource Limits: Implement limits on query complexity, transaction size, and the number of objects that can be retrieved in a single operation. This could involve configurable limits or heuristics to detect potentially abusive queries.
      • Secure Error Handling: Implement robust error handling that avoids leaking sensitive information. Provide clear and consistent error codes to the application layer.

  • Realm Object Server (Swift/C++):

    • Threats:
      • Object Relationship Vulnerabilities: Incorrect handling of object relationships (e.g., to-many relationships) could lead to data corruption or unexpected behavior.
      • Notification System Issues: Vulnerabilities in the notification system could allow attackers to intercept or manipulate notifications, potentially leading to data leaks or incorrect application behavior.
    • Mitigation:
      • Relationship Integrity Checks: Implement robust checks to ensure the integrity of object relationships, preventing dangling pointers or inconsistent data.
      • Secure Notification Handling: Ensure that notifications are delivered securely and that the application handles them correctly, validating the source and content of notifications.

  • Query Engine (Swift/C++):

    • Threats:
      • Query Optimization Issues: Vulnerabilities in the query optimizer could lead to inefficient queries or unexpected results.
      • Data Leakage: Incorrectly optimized queries could potentially leak information about the structure or content of the database.
    • Mitigation:
      • Regular Audits of Query Optimizer: Conduct regular security audits of the query optimizer to identify and address potential vulnerabilities.
      • Fuzz Testing of Query Engine: Extend fuzz testing to specifically target the query engine with various valid and invalid queries.

  • Storage Engine (C++):

    • Threats:
      • Data Corruption: Bugs in the storage engine could lead to data corruption or loss.
      • Encryption Weaknesses: If encryption at rest is enabled, vulnerabilities in the encryption implementation or key management could compromise data confidentiality.
      • File System Permissions Issues: Incorrect file system permissions could allow unauthorized access to the Realm database file.
    • Mitigation:
      • Extensive Testing: Continue to perform extensive testing of the storage engine, including unit tests, integration tests, and fuzz testing.
      • Secure Encryption Implementation: Ensure that the encryption implementation uses strong algorithms and secure key management practices (leveraging the iOS Keychain). Regularly review and update the cryptographic implementation.
      • File System Permissions: Rely on the operating system's sandboxing and file system permissions to protect the Realm database file. Explicitly document that developers should not attempt to modify these permissions.

  • Realm Core Database (C++):

    • Threats: This is the most critical component from a security perspective, as it handles the actual data storage and manipulation. Vulnerabilities here could have the most severe consequences.
      • Buffer Overflows: Classic C++ vulnerability.
      • Use-After-Free: Another classic C++ vulnerability.
      • Integer Overflows: Can lead to unexpected behavior and potentially vulnerabilities.
      • Logic Errors: Complex logic in the database engine could contain subtle errors that lead to security vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation:
      • Secure Coding Practices: Continue to follow secure coding practices, including code reviews, static analysis, and dynamic analysis.
      • Fuzz Testing: Maintain and expand the existing fuzz testing infrastructure to cover a wider range of inputs and scenarios.
      • Memory Safety: Explore the use of memory-safe languages or techniques (e.g., Rust) for critical parts of the database engine to reduce the risk of memory-related vulnerabilities. This is a long-term strategy.
      • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of the core database engine by independent security experts.

  • iOS/macOS Security Features (Keychain, Sandboxing):

    • Threats:
      • Keychain Compromise: If the iOS Keychain is compromised, the encryption keys used by Realm could be exposed.
      • Sandboxing Escape: If an attacker can escape the application sandbox, they could potentially access the Realm database file.
    • Mitigation:
      • Keychain Best Practices: Follow Apple's best practices for using the Keychain, including using appropriate access control settings and avoiding storing sensitive data directly in the Keychain (use it only for keys).
      • Sandboxing Reliance: Rely on the iOS/macOS sandboxing mechanism to protect the Realm database file. Avoid any actions that could weaken the sandbox.
      • Biometric Authentication: Recommend (in documentation) that applications using Realm consider integrating with biometric authentication (Touch ID, Face ID) to provide an additional layer of security for accessing sensitive data. This is an application-level recommendation, but Realm should provide guidance.

3. Inferred Architecture, Components, and Data Flow

Based on the documentation and design review, we can infer the following:

  1. Data Flow:

    • The application uses the Realm Swift API to interact with the database.
    • The Realm Swift API calls into the Realm Core Database (C++).
    • The Realm Core Database interacts with the storage engine.
    • The storage engine reads and writes data to the Realm database file on the device's file system.
    • If encryption is enabled, the storage engine encrypts and decrypts data using keys obtained from the iOS Keychain.

  2. Components: The key components are as described in the C4 diagrams. The critical interaction is between the Swift API layer and the C++ core.

  3. Architecture: Realm follows a layered architecture, with the Swift API providing a high-level interface to the underlying C++ database engine. This separation of concerns is generally good for security, but it also introduces a potential attack surface at the boundary between the two layers.

4. Specific Security Considerations and Recommendations

Here are specific, actionable recommendations tailored to Realm Swift, addressing the threats and vulnerabilities identified above:

  • 4.1. Input Validation and Sanitization (High Priority):

    • Problem: The biggest immediate threat is injection attacks through NSPredicate.
    • Recommendation:
      • Mandatory Parameterized Queries: Modify the Realm Swift API to enforce the use of parameterized queries for all NSPredicate-based queries. Deprecate or remove any methods that allow constructing queries using string concatenation. This is a breaking change, but it's essential for security.
      • Documentation: Clearly and prominently document the use of parameterized queries and the dangers of string concatenation. Provide numerous examples.
      • Static Analysis: Integrate static analysis tools (e.g., SwiftLint) into the build process to detect and warn about potential injection vulnerabilities.
      • Fuzz Testing: Add fuzz testing that specifically targets the query parsing and execution logic with a wide range of valid and invalid NSPredicate strings.

  • 4.2. Encryption at Rest (Medium Priority):

    • Problem: Reliance on the iOS Keychain, while generally secure, means that a Keychain compromise could expose encryption keys.
    • Recommendation:
      • Key Derivation: Instead of storing the raw encryption key directly in the Keychain, derive the key from a combination of a Keychain-stored secret and a user-provided password or biometric authentication. This would make it more difficult for an attacker to decrypt the database even if they compromise the Keychain. This is a significant architectural change.
      • Documentation: Provide clear guidance on how to securely configure and use encryption at rest, including best practices for key management.
      • Audit: Regularly audit the encryption implementation to ensure it meets current security standards.

  • 4.3. Dependency Management (Medium Priority):

    • Problem: Swift Package Manager provides integrity checks, but vulnerabilities in dependencies could still be exploited.
    • Recommendation:
      • SBOM: Implement a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) to track all dependencies and their versions. This will make it easier to identify and respond to vulnerabilities.
      • Automated Vulnerability Scanning: Integrate automated vulnerability scanning tools (e.g., Dependabot, Snyk) into the CI/CD pipeline to detect known vulnerabilities in dependencies.
      • Regular Updates: Keep dependencies up to date to address security vulnerabilities.

  • 4.4. Secure Development Practices (Ongoing):

    • Problem: Maintaining a high level of security requires ongoing effort.
    • Recommendation:
      • Security Training: Provide regular security training for developers working on Realm Swift.
      • Code Reviews: Continue to enforce mandatory code reviews for all changes, with a specific focus on security.
      • Static and Dynamic Analysis: Use a combination of static and dynamic analysis tools to identify potential vulnerabilities.
      • Penetration Testing: Conduct regular penetration testing by independent security experts.
      • Bug Bounty Program: Consider establishing a bug bounty program to incentivize external security researchers to report vulnerabilities.

  • 4.5. iOS-Specific Recommendations (Application-Level, but Realm should provide guidance):

    • Biometric Authentication: Strongly recommend (in documentation) that applications using Realm integrate with biometric authentication (Touch ID, Face ID) to protect sensitive data.
    • Data Protection API: Encourage developers to use the iOS Data Protection API to further protect the Realm database file when the device is locked.
    • Background App Refresh: Advise developers to carefully consider the security implications of using background app refresh with Realm, as it could potentially expose data to unauthorized access.
    • App Transport Security (ATS): If using Device Sync, ensure ATS is properly configured to enforce secure network connections.

  • 4.6 Realm Core Hardening (Long-Term):

    • Problem: The C++ core is a complex codebase with inherent risks.
    • Recommendation:
      • Memory Safety Exploration: Begin researching and experimenting with integrating memory-safe languages (like Rust) into parts of the Realm Core. This is a long-term, strategic investment to significantly reduce a major class of vulnerabilities.
      • Compartmentalization: Explore ways to further compartmentalize the core database engine to limit the impact of any single vulnerability.

5. Mitigation Strategies (Summary Table)

| Threat | Vulnerability | Mitigation Strategy | | Threat | Vulnerability | Mitigation Strategy