- Description: An attacker intercepts the TLS/SSL handshake by presenting a forged certificate. The attacker might use a self-signed certificate, a certificate signed by an untrusted CA, or a valid certificate for a different domain. If the application's CocoaAsyncSocket implementation doesn't properly validate the certificate within the delegate methods, the attacker can decrypt, modify, and re-encrypt the traffic. This is a direct misuse of CocoaAsyncSocket's TLS features.
- Impact: Complete compromise of confidentiality and integrity of communication. Sensitive data can be stolen or modified. The attacker can inject malicious data.
- Affected Component:
GCDAsyncSocket
'sstartTLS:
method and related delegate methods:socket:didReceiveTrust:completionHandler:
,socket:didConnectToHost:port:
. Specifically, incorrect or missing implementation of certificate validation within these methods. - Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Strict Certificate Validation: Implement correct and complete certificate validation in the
socket:didReceiveTrust:completionHandler:
delegate method. Never call the completion handler withYES
without thorough validation usingSecTrustEvaluateWithError
. - Check Certificate Chain: Verify the entire certificate chain up to a trusted root CA.
- Hostname Verification: Ensure the certificate's CN or SAN matches the expected hostname.
- Certificate Pinning (Strongly Recommended): Store a hash of the expected server certificate (or public key) and compare it during the handshake.
- Disable Weak Ciphers: Configure
GCDAsyncSocket
(via thesslSettings
dictionary instartTLS:
) to use only strong cipher suites and TLS versions (TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3). - Use
kCFStreamSSLValidatesCertificateChain
: Set totrue
insslSettings
.
- Strict Certificate Validation: Implement correct and complete certificate validation in the
- Description: An attacker on the network path intercepts and modifies data sent over a plain TCP or UDP connection. This occurs when the application chooses not to use CocoaAsyncSocket's TLS/DTLS capabilities. This is a direct result of not using a core security feature of the library.
- Impact: Loss of data integrity. The attacker can inject malicious data or corrupt existing data.
- Affected Component:
GCDAsyncSocket
(when not usingstartTLS:
) andGCDAsyncUdpSocket
(when not using DTLS). The absence of using the security features. - Risk Severity: Critical (if sensitive data is transmitted), High (otherwise)
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Use TLS/SSL (TCP): Always use
GCDAsyncSocket
'sstartTLS:
method with proper certificate validation for TCP connections. - Use DTLS (UDP): Always use
GCDAsyncUdpSocket
's DTLS support for UDP connections when transmitting sensitive data.
- Use TLS/SSL (TCP): Always use
- Description: An attacker opens many TCP connections or sends a flood of UDP packets. While resource exhaustion is a general concept, this threat is directly related to how the application uses CocoaAsyncSocket to accept connections or receive data. The library provides the mechanism for connection/packet handling, and the application's use (or misuse) of this mechanism creates the vulnerability.
- Impact: Denial of Service (DoS).
- Affected Component:
GCDAsyncSocket
(listening socket, specifically theacceptOnInterface:port:error:
and related delegate methods) andGCDAsyncUdpSocket
(receiving data). The core socket listening and receiving functionality. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Connection Limits: Limit the maximum number of concurrent connections accepted by the
GCDAsyncSocket
listening socket. - Timeouts: Use
GCDAsyncSocket
'sreadTimeout
andwriteTimeout
properties on accepted sockets. Use appropriate timeouts forGCDAsyncUdpSocket
's receive operations. - Rate Limiting (UDP): Implement rate limiting for incoming UDP packets in conjunction with
GCDAsyncUdpSocket
.
- Connection Limits: Limit the maximum number of concurrent connections accepted by the
- Description: An attacker establishes a TCP connection but sends/receives data very slowly. This is a direct attack on how the application uses CocoaAsyncSocket's read/write APIs. The vulnerability exists because of how the application handles the asynchronous I/O provided by the library.
- Impact: Denial of Service (DoS).
- Affected Component:
GCDAsyncSocket
's read and write operations (specifically, the asynchronous delegate methods likesocket:didReadData:withTag:
andsocket:didWriteDataWithTag:
). The core asynchronous I/O handling. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Read and Write Timeouts: Must use
GCDAsyncSocket
'sreadTimeout
andwriteTimeout
properties with appropriate values. This is the primary defense and directly uses CocoaAsyncSocket's features. - Asynchronous Operations: Ensure all read/write operations are performed asynchronously using CocoaAsyncSocket's delegate methods.
- Read and Write Timeouts: Must use
- Description: A vulnerability is discovered within the CocoaAsyncSocket library itself (e.g., a buffer overflow in the parsing of TLS records). This is a direct threat to the library's code.
- Impact: Varies; could range from DoS to Remote Code Execution (RCE).
- Affected Component: Potentially any part of
GCDAsyncSocket
orGCDAsyncUdpSocket
. - Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the vulnerability)
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Keep Updated: Regularly update CocoaAsyncSocket to the latest version. This is the most important mitigation.
- Input Validation (Secondary): While not a direct fix for a library vulnerability, robust input validation in the application can sometimes mitigate the impact.