Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
90 lines (77 loc) · 7.33 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

90 lines (77 loc) · 7.33 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for robbiehanson/xmppframework

Objective: To gain unauthorized access to XMPP resources (user accounts, messages, presence information) or to disrupt the XMPP service for legitimate users, leveraging vulnerabilities or misconfigurations within the robbiehanson/xmppframework or its interaction with the application.

Attack Tree Visualization

                                      [Root: Compromise XMPP Resources/Service] [!]
                                                    |
          -------------------------------------------------------------------------
          |                                               |                        
  [1.  **Impersonate User**] [!]               [2.  Denial of Service (DoS)]          [3.  **Information Disclosure**]
          |                                               |                        
  ---------------------                       ---------------------------------        --------------------------------
  |                                               |                                    |                              
[1.1 **SASL Weakness**] [!]               [2.1 **Resource Exhaustion**] [!]       [3.2 **Message Interception**] [!]
  |                                               |                                    |                              
  -----                                       ---------------                          -----                          
  |                                         |       |                                  |
[1.1.1 **Weak SASL Mechanism**]        [2.1.1 **Connection Flood**]      [2.1.3 **CPU Exhaustion (XML Parsing)**]    [3.2.1 **TLS Stripping**]

Attack Tree Path: Impersonate User via SASL Weakness

  • Path: [Root] ---> [1. Impersonate User] ---> [1.1 SASL Weakness] ---> [1.1.1 Weak SASL Mechanism]
  • Description: This attack path focuses on exploiting weaknesses in the authentication process. The attacker leverages a misconfiguration or vulnerability in the SASL (Simple Authentication and Security Layer) implementation to gain the credentials of a legitimate user.
  • Steps:
    • [1.1.1 Weak SASL Mechanism]:
      • The application or framework is configured to use a weak SASL mechanism (e.g., PLAIN without TLS, or a vulnerable custom mechanism).
      • The attacker can potentially sniff credentials transmitted in plain text (if TLS is not enforced) or exploit known vulnerabilities in the chosen mechanism.
      • Examples:
        • If PLAIN is used without TLS, the attacker can use a network sniffer to capture the username and password.
        • If a custom, flawed SASL mechanism is used, the attacker might exploit a cryptographic weakness or implementation bug.
  • Criticality: High. Successful impersonation grants the attacker full access to the compromised user's account, allowing them to send and receive messages, access contacts, and potentially perform other actions as that user.
  • Mitigation:
    • Enforce the use of strong SASL mechanisms (e.g., SCRAM-SHA-256, SCRAM-SHA-1 with channel binding).
    • Mandatory use of TLS encryption for all XMPP connections.
    • Disable weak or custom SASL mechanisms.
    • Regularly review and update the framework and its dependencies to address known vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: Denial of Service via Resource Exhaustion (Connection Flood)

  • Path 1: [Root] ---> [2. Denial of Service] ---> [2.1 Resource Exhaustion] ---> [2.1.1 Connection Flood]
  • Description: This attack aims to make the XMPP service unavailable to legitimate users by overwhelming the server or client with connection requests.
  • Steps:
    • [2.1.1 Connection Flood]:
      • The attacker opens a large number of XMPP connections to the server (or client, if attacking a client-side component).
      • This consumes server resources (e.g., file descriptors, memory, CPU) and prevents legitimate users from establishing connections.
      • The framework might be vulnerable if it doesn't handle connection limits or timeouts properly.
  • Criticality: Medium to High. While not resulting in data breaches, DoS attacks can significantly disrupt service and cause reputational damage.
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement connection rate limiting on both the client and server.
    • Configure appropriate connection timeouts.
    • Monitor server resource usage and set alerts for unusual activity.
    • Use a robust network infrastructure that can handle a large number of connections.

Attack Tree Path: Denial of Service via Resource Exhaustion (CPU Exhaustion)

  • Path 2: [Root] ---> [2. Denial of Service] ---> [2.1 Resource Exhaustion] ---> [2.1.3 CPU Exhaustion (XML Parsing)]
  • Description: This attack exploits vulnerabilities in the XML parsing process to consume excessive CPU resources, leading to a denial of service.
  • Steps:
    • [2.1.3 CPU Exhaustion (XML Parsing)]:
      • The attacker sends specially crafted XMPP stanzas containing large or deeply nested XML documents.
      • The XML parser consumes excessive CPU resources while processing these malicious stanzas.
      • This can slow down or completely halt the XMPP service.
  • Criticality: Medium to High. Similar to connection floods, this can disrupt service availability.
  • Mitigation:
    • Use a secure and robust XML parser that is resistant to XML bomb attacks and other parsing vulnerabilities.
    • Implement limits on the size and nesting depth of XML documents processed by the framework.
    • Regularly update the XML parser library to address known vulnerabilities.
    • Consider using a non-recursive XML parser.

Attack Tree Path: Information Disclosure via Message Interception (TLS Stripping)

  • Path: [Root] ---> [3. Information Disclosure] ---> [3.2 Message Interception] ---> [3.2.1 TLS Stripping]
  • Description: This attack aims to intercept XMPP messages by downgrading the connection from secure TLS to unencrypted plaintext.
  • Steps:
    • [3.2.1 TLS Stripping]:
      • The attacker performs a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack, positioning themselves between the client and the server.
      • The attacker intercepts the initial connection negotiation and prevents the establishment of a secure TLS connection.
      • The client and server then communicate in plaintext, allowing the attacker to read all transmitted messages.
  • Criticality: High. This attack compromises the confidentiality of all XMPP communications, exposing sensitive information.
  • Mitigation:
    • Enforce mandatory TLS encryption for all XMPP connections.
    • The framework should refuse to connect without TLS.
    • Implement strict server certificate validation. The framework should verify the certificate's validity, chain of trust, and hostname.
    • Educate users about the importance of using secure networks and avoiding public Wi-Fi without a VPN.
    • Consider using DNSSEC and DANE to further secure the TLS handshake.