Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
141 lines (104 loc) · 10.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

141 lines (104 loc) · 10.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for robbiehanson/xmppframework

Mitigation Strategy: Secure XML Parsing (within xmppframework)

  • Description:

    1. Locate NSXMLParser Initialization: Find where xmppframework creates and configures its NSXMLParser instances (likely within XMPPStream or related classes).
    2. Apply Secure Settings: Before any XML parsing, set these properties on the NSXMLParser instance:
      • parser.shouldProcessNamespaces = YES;
      • parser.shouldReportNamespacePrefixes = NO;
      • parser.shouldResolveExternalEntities = NO; (Critical for XXE prevention)
    3. DTD Handling (If Absolutely Necessary): If DTD validation is unavoidable (it usually isn't for XMPP):
      • Bundle a local, trusted DTD file with the application.
      • Configure the NSXMLParser to use only this local DTD. Never allow remote DTDs. This might require a custom NSURLProtocol.
    4. Testing (xmppframework-Specific): Create unit tests that feed malicious XML (XXE payloads) through the xmppframework components (e.g., by simulating server responses). Verify that the framework correctly rejects these inputs.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • XML External Entity (XXE) Injection: (Severity: Critical) - Attackers can read local files, access internal resources, or potentially execute code.
    • Billion Laughs Attack (XML Bomb): (Severity: High) - Denial of service via excessive memory consumption.
    • XML Denial of Service (XDoS): (Severity: High) - Various XML-based attacks that consume resources.

  • Impact:

    • XXE Injection: Risk reduced from Critical to Negligible (with correct implementation).
    • Billion Laughs: Risk reduced from High to Low.
    • XDoS: Risk reduced from High to Medium (some attacks might still be possible).

  • Currently Implemented: (Example) Partially. Secure settings in XMPPStream.m, but DTD handling is not explicitly addressed.

  • Missing Implementation: (Example) DTD handling needs secure configuration. Unit tests specifically targeting xmppframework's XML parsing are missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Strict TLS/SSL Certificate Validation (within xmppframework)

  • Description:

    1. Locate GCDAsyncSocketDelegate: Find the GCDAsyncSocketDelegate implementation used by xmppframework.
    2. Implement socket:didReceiveTrust:completionHandler:: This is the critical method. Within it:
      • Obtain Certificate Chain: Get the SecTrustRef from the trust parameter.
      • Validate Chain: Use SecTrustEvaluateWithError to validate the chain against the system trust store and any custom CA certificates (if used).
      • Hostname Verification: Extract the server's hostname (CN or SAN) from the certificate. Compare this strictly against the expected XMPP server hostname. Reject wildcards unless absolutely necessary and carefully controlled.
      • Certificate Pinning (Optional, Highly Recommended):
        • Securely store the expected server certificate's public key hash (e.g., SHA-256).
        • Calculate the hash of the presented certificate's public key.
        • Compare the calculated hash with the stored hash. Reject if they don't match.
      • Completion Handler: Call completionHandler with YES only if all checks pass; otherwise, NO.
    3. Custom CA (If Applicable): Securely embed the CA's certificate. Load it and add it to the SecTrustRef before evaluation.
    4. Testing (xmppframework-Specific): Create test cases that simulate MitM attacks with invalid certificates specifically within the context of an xmppframework connection.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attack: (Severity: Critical) - Interception and modification of XMPP traffic.
    • Impersonation: (Severity: Critical) - Attackers can impersonate the XMPP server.

  • Impact:

    • MitM Attack: Risk reduced from Critical to Low (with pinning) or Medium (without pinning).
    • Impersonation: Risk reduced from Critical to Low (with pinning) or Medium (without pinning).

  • Currently Implemented: (Example) Basic TLS is enabled, but hostname verification is not strict, and pinning is not implemented.

  • Missing Implementation: (Example) Strict hostname verification, certificate pinning, and xmppframework-specific MitM tests are missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Robust Stream Error Handling (within xmppframework)

  • Description:

    1. Implement XMPPStreamDelegate Error Methods: Implement all relevant error-handling methods in the XMPPStreamDelegate:
      • xmppStream:didNotAuthenticate:
      • xmppStream:didFailToSendIQ:error:
      • xmppStream:didFailToConnect:error:
      • xmppStreamDidDisconnect:withError:
      • ...and others as needed.
    2. Secure Logging (within the Delegate): Log errors, but avoid sensitive information (passwords, tokens) in the logs generated within the delegate methods.
    3. Graceful Termination: For fatal errors, ensure the XMPPStream is properly closed ([xmppStream disconnect]) and resources are released from within the delegate.
    4. Testing (xmppframework-Specific): Simulate error conditions (invalid credentials, server errors) that trigger xmppframework's delegate methods and verify correct handling.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS): (Severity: Medium) - Prevents unresponsiveness due to errors.
    • Information Leakage: (Severity: Low) - Reduces risk of exposing sensitive information via xmppframework's error reporting.

  • Impact:

    • DoS: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.
    • Information Leakage: Risk reduced from Low to Negligible.

  • Currently Implemented: (Example) Some error handling is present, but it's not comprehensive.

  • Missing Implementation: (Example) Comprehensive implementation of all relevant delegate methods, secure logging within the delegate, and xmppframework-specific error simulation tests.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Sanitization and Validation (Leveraging xmppframework API)

  • Description:

    1. Use xmppframework's Classes: Always use xmppframework's provided classes (e.g., XMPPMessage, XMPPIQ, XMPPPresence) to construct and parse stanzas. Avoid manual XML string manipulation.
    2. Use Accessor Methods: When extracting data, use methods like stringValue, attributeStringValueForName:, etc. These methods often provide some level of built-in handling.
    3. Context-Specific Escaping/Encoding (After Extraction): After extracting data using xmppframework's methods, apply appropriate escaping/encoding based on where the data will be used (UI, database, etc.). This is crucial even when using the framework's API.
    4. Testing (xmppframework-Specific): Craft malicious XMPP stanzas and send them through xmppframework (simulating server responses). Verify that the data extracted using the framework's API, combined with your escaping/encoding, prevents injection attacks.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): (Severity: High) - If data is displayed in a web view.
    • Injection Attacks (General): (Severity: Medium to High)
    • Data Corruption: (Severity: Low)

  • Impact:

    • XSS: Risk reduced from High to Low (with proper escaping).
    • Injection Attacks: Risk reduced from Medium/High to Low.
    • Data Corruption: Risk reduced from Low to Negligible.

  • Currently Implemented: (Example) Basic escaping is used, but comprehensive validation and xmppframework-specific injection tests are missing.

  • Missing Implementation: (Example) Comprehensive input validation, and testing for injection attacks specifically through the xmppframework API.

Mitigation Strategy: Strong Authentication (Using xmppframework's SASL Support)

  • Description:

    1. Choose Strong SASL Mechanism: Use xmppframework's SASL support to implement a strong mechanism. Prefer SASL SCRAM-SHA-* (e.g., SCRAM-SHA-256) over weaker ones like PLAIN (unless TLS is absolutely guaranteed) or DIGEST-MD5.
    2. Configure xmppframework: Ensure that xmppframework is configured to use the chosen SASL mechanism. This usually involves setting properties on the XMPPStream or related objects.
    3. Testing (xmppframework-Specific): Test authentication with various credentials using xmppframework's API. Verify that weak mechanisms are rejected and strong mechanisms work correctly.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access: (Severity: Critical)
    • Impersonation: (Severity: Critical)

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access: Risk reduced from Critical to Low.
    • Impersonation: Risk reduced from Critical to Low.

  • Currently Implemented: (Example) SASL PLAIN is used.

  • Missing Implementation: (Example) Switch to SASL SCRAM-SHA-*. Test xmppframework's authentication with various mechanisms.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular xmppframework Updates

  • Description:

    1. Dependency Management: Use a dependency manager (CocoaPods, Carthage, Swift Package Manager).
    2. Regular Updates: Regularly check for and apply updates to xmppframework.
    3. Security Advisories: Monitor the xmppframework GitHub repository for security advisories.
    4. Testing (Post-Update): After updating, thoroughly test the application, paying close attention to xmppframework-related functionality.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Known Vulnerabilities: (Severity: Variable, can be Low to Critical) - Addresses vulnerabilities fixed in newer versions.

  • Impact:

    • Known Vulnerabilities: Risk reduced from Variable to Negligible (for known and patched issues).

  • Currently Implemented: (Example) CocoaPods is used, but updates are infrequent.

  • Missing Implementation: (Example) Establish a regular update schedule. Monitor security advisories. Conduct thorough post-update testing focused on xmppframework.