Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
90 lines (69 loc) · 7.76 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

90 lines (69 loc) · 7.76 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for slackhq/slacktextviewcontroller

Mitigation Strategy: STVC-Specific Configuration and Feature Disabling

1. Mitigation Strategy: STVC-Specific Configuration and Feature Disabling

*   **Description:**
    1.  **Review Documentation:** Thoroughly review the `SlackTextViewController` documentation (API reference, configuration options, and any available security guides).
    2.  **Disable Unnecessary Features:** Identify and disable any STVC features that are *not essential* to your application's functionality.  This includes:
        *   `autoCompletes:`  If you don't *need* auto-completion for usernames, channels, or emojis, disable it.  If you *do* need it, consider limiting the scope (e.g., only auto-complete users in the current channel).
        *   `textView.shouldEnableTypingSuggestion:` If you don't need typing suggestions, disable.
        *   `allowsPaste:` Consider if pasting rich text is truly necessary. If not, disable it to reduce the attack surface.
        *   `allowsAttachments:` If your application doesn't support attachments, disable this feature.
        *   Any other optional features related to formatting, linking, etc.
    3.  **Configure Text Input Restrictions:**
        *   `textView.textLimit:` Set a reasonable maximum character limit *directly within STVC*. This provides a client-side check (though server-side enforcement is still crucial).
        *   Explore any other STVC configuration options that allow you to restrict the type or format of input.
    4.  **Event Handling:** Carefully review the event handlers provided by STVC (e.g., `didChangeText`, `didPressLeftButton`, `didPressRightButton`).  Ensure that *your* code within these handlers does not introduce vulnerabilities.  For example, if you're doing any custom processing of the text within `didChangeText`, make sure that processing is secure.
    5.  **Custom Renderers (If Applicable):** If you are using custom renderers to display the STVC output, ensure those renderers are secure and handle potentially malicious input safely.

*   **Threats Mitigated:**
    *   **Cross-Site Scripting (XSS):** (Severity: High) - By disabling unnecessary features and restricting input, you reduce the potential for malicious code to be injected and rendered.
    *   **Data Leakage (Enumeration):** (Severity: Low) - Disabling auto-completion reduces the risk of attackers enumerating users or channels.
    *   **Denial of Service (DoS):** (Severity: Medium) - Limiting text length helps prevent resource exhaustion attacks.
    *   **Phishing (via Mentions):** (Severity: Medium) - Disabling or restricting auto-completion reduces the attack surface for phishing.

*   **Impact:**
    *   **XSS:** Risk reduction: Moderate (reduces the attack surface, but independent sanitization is still essential).
    *   **Data Leakage:** Risk reduction: Moderate (disabling auto-completion is a significant step).
    *   **DoS:** Risk reduction: Low (client-side limits are a first line of defense, but server-side limits are crucial).
    *   **Phishing:** Risk reduction: Moderate.

*   **Currently Implemented:**
    *   Example: Partially implemented. `textView.textLimit` is set, but other features (like auto-completion) are enabled without restriction.

*   **Missing Implementation:**
    *   A comprehensive review of all STVC configuration options and feature flags needs to be conducted.
    *   Unnecessary features need to be explicitly disabled.
    *   The scope of auto-completion (if used) needs to be restricted.

Mitigation Strategy: Client-Side Input Pre-processing (Before STVC)

2. Mitigation Strategy: Client-Side Input Pre-processing (Before STVC)

*   **Description:**
    1.  **Interception:** Before any text is passed to `SlackTextViewController`, intercept it. This might be in a text field delegate method, an `onChange` handler, or wherever user input is first received.
    2.  **Basic Sanitization (Lightweight):** Perform a *lightweight*, preliminary sanitization *before* passing the text to STVC. This is *not* a replacement for a full sanitization library (as described in previous responses), but rather a quick, client-side check to remove obviously dangerous characters or patterns.  Examples:
        *   Remove or escape known dangerous characters like `<`, `>`, `&` (if not already handled by STVC).
        *   Reject input that contains obvious script tags (e.g., `<script>`).
        *   Implement a very basic regular expression whitelist to allow only a limited set of characters (if appropriate for your use case).
    3.  **Pass to STVC:** After this pre-processing, pass the (potentially modified) text to `SlackTextViewController`.

*   **Threats Mitigated:**
    *   **Cross-Site Scripting (XSS):** (Severity: High) - Provides an *additional* layer of defense against XSS, catching simple attacks before they reach STVC.
    *   **HTML/Markdown Injection:** (Severity: Medium) - Similar to XSS, helps prevent basic injection attacks.

*   **Impact:**
    *   **XSS:** Risk reduction: Low (this is a *supplementary* measure, not a primary defense).
    *   **HTML/Markdown Injection:** Risk reduction: Low (supplementary).

*   **Currently Implemented:**
    *   Not implemented. Input is passed directly to STVC without any pre-processing.

*   **Missing Implementation:**
    *   The interception and lightweight sanitization logic needs to be implemented before any text is sent to STVC.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Handling of STVC Output

  • 3. Mitigation Strategy: Secure Handling of STVC Output

    • Description:

      1. Retrieve Output Safely: When retrieving the formatted text or attributed string from STVC, use the appropriate methods provided by the library (e.g., textView.attributedText, textView.text).
      2. Avoid Direct Use in Risky Contexts: Never directly insert the raw output from STVC into a context where it could be interpreted as code (e.g., a WKWebView without proper sanitization, or directly into a database query).
      3. Output Encoding: If you are displaying the STVC output in a UI element (e.g., a label, another text view), ensure that proper output encoding is applied. This helps prevent misinterpretation of characters.
      4. Contextual Rendering: If the output is displayed in different contexts (e.g., a preview vs. a full message view), ensure that the rendering is appropriate for each context. For example, a preview might have stricter limits on formatting.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): (Severity: High) - Prevents vulnerabilities if the STVC output is displayed in a web view or other context where code could be executed.
      • HTML/Markdown Injection: (Severity: Medium) - Ensures that the output is treated as data, not code.

    • Impact:

      • XSS: Risk reduction: High (if the output is displayed in a web view or similar context).
      • HTML/Markdown Injection: Risk reduction: Medium.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Partially implemented. Output encoding is used when displaying the text in a UILabel, but not in all contexts.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • The code that displays STVC output in a custom preview view needs to be reviewed to ensure proper output encoding and handling.
      • Any use of STVC output in a web view needs thorough review and likely requires additional sanitization.