Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
81 lines (66 loc) · 6.66 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

81 lines (66 loc) · 6.66 KB

Threat Model Analysis for sparkle-project/sparkle

Threat: T1: Appcast Spoofing via Man-in-the-Middle (MitM)

  • Description: An attacker intercepts the network connection between the application and the update server during the appcast download. The attacker modifies the appcast content, redirecting the application to a malicious update package. This exploits weaknesses in network security or compromises a network device.
    • Impact: The application downloads and installs a malicious update, leading to complete compromise of the application and potentially the user's system.
    • Sparkle Component Affected: SUUpdater (the main update controller), SUAppcastFetcher (responsible for downloading the appcast), and the underlying networking libraries used for HTTPS communication.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict HTTPS: Enforce HTTPS for appcast downloads with no fallback to HTTP.
      • Certificate Pinning: Implement certificate pinning.
      • Certificate Transparency Monitoring: Monitor Certificate Transparency logs.
      • HSTS: Configure the update server to use HSTS.

Threat: T2: Malicious Update Package Distribution

  • Description: An attacker compromises the update server or obtains the developer's private signing key. They replace the legitimate update package with a malicious one, leveraging the trust in the update mechanism.
    • Impact: Complete compromise of the application and potentially the user's system upon installation of the malicious update.
    • Sparkle Component Affected: SUUpdater, SUAppcast, Sুপdate, and the signature verification logic within SUBinaryDelta.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strong Code Signing: Use a robust code signing process with an HSM or secure key management system. Rotate keys periodically.
      • Appcast Signing (Ed25519): Always digitally sign the appcast using Ed25519. Verify the appcast signature.
      • Secure Build Server: Ensure the build server is highly secure.
      • Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Require 2FA for access.
      • Intrusion Detection System (IDS): Implement an IDS.

Threat: T3: Appcast Tampering (Unsigned Appcast)

  • Description: If the appcast is not digitally signed, an attacker who compromises the update server (or performs a MitM) can modify the appcast content undetected.
    • Impact: The application may download and install a malicious update, be prevented from updating, or be directed to a malicious server.
    • Sparkle Component Affected: SUAppcastFetcher, SUAppcast, SUUpdater.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Mandatory Appcast Signing: Always digitally sign the appcast using Ed25519. Reject unsigned appcasts.

Threat: T4: Downgrade Attack

  • Description: An attacker modifies the appcast to point to an older, vulnerable version of the application. Sparkle might install the older version, even if the user has a newer, patched version.
    • Impact: The user's application is reverted to a version with known vulnerabilities.
    • Sparkle Component Affected: SUAppcast, SUUpdater, and the version comparison logic within SUVersionComparison.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Version Comparison: Ensure Sparkle prevents downgrades by default. Provide a secure mechanism to explicitly allow downgrades only when absolutely necessary.
      • Appcast Signing: A signed appcast prevents arbitrary changes to version numbers.

Threat: T6: Exploitation of Sparkle Framework Vulnerabilities

  • Description: A vulnerability within the Sparkle framework itself (e.g., buffer overflow, format string vulnerability, logic error) is exploited. This could be triggered by a crafted appcast or update package.
    • Impact: Varies; could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution within the application's context.
    • Sparkle Component Affected: Potentially any component of Sparkle.
    • Risk Severity: High (potentially Critical, depending on the vulnerability)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Keep Sparkle Updated: Regularly update Sparkle to the latest version.
      • Code Audits: Conduct or commission security audits of the Sparkle codebase.
      • Fuzzing: Use fuzzing to test Sparkle's input handling.
      • Vulnerability Disclosure Program: Participate in a vulnerability disclosure program.

Threat: T7: Improper Sparkle Configuration

  • Description: The developer makes mistakes when integrating Sparkle, such as disabling security features, using weak settings, or failing to validate inputs.
    • Impact: Creates vulnerabilities that wouldn't exist with correct configuration, potentially leading to other threats.
    • Sparkle Component Affected: Any component of Sparkle.
    • Risk Severity: High (potentially Critical, depending on the misconfiguration)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Follow Documentation: Carefully follow Sparkle documentation and best practices.
      • Code Review: Thoroughly review the Sparkle integration code.
      • Security Checklists: Use security checklists.
      • Testing: Thoroughly test the update process, including negative test cases.

Threat: T8: Weak Cryptographic Implementation

  • Description: Vulnerabilities in the underlying cryptographic library used by Sparkle (for signature verification or HTTPS) are exploited, or weak parameters are used.
    • Impact: An attacker could forge a signature or bypass HTTPS security, leading to malicious update installation or data interception.
    • Sparkle Component Affected: SUUpdater, SUAppcast, SUBinaryDelta, and any component using cryptographic functions.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Use Strong Cryptography: Use well-vetted libraries and algorithms (Sparkle recommends Ed25519).
      • Sufficient Key Lengths: Ensure sufficiently long keys.
      • Keep Libraries Updated: Keep cryptographic libraries updated.