Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
77 lines (62 loc) · 8.04 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

77 lines (62 loc) · 8.04 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for steipete/aspects

Objective: Compromise Application using Aspects Library

Attack Tree Visualization

Root: Compromise Application using Aspects [CRITICAL NODE]
    └── OR 1: Inject Malicious Aspect [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK]
        ├── OR 1.1: Supply Malicious Aspect via Configuration [HIGH-RISK]
        │   └── AND 1.1.1: Access Configuration System AND Modify Aspect Definition
        └── OR 1.3: Compromise Development Environment/Supply Chain [HIGH-RISK]
        │   └── AND 1.3.1: Compromise Developer Machine/CI/CD Pipeline AND Inject Malicious Aspect During Build/Deployment
        └── OR 1.4: Social Engineering to Induce Malicious Aspect Addition [HIGH-RISK]
            └── AND 1.4.1: Socially Engineer Developer/Admin AND Trick them into Adding Malicious Aspect Code

Attack Tree Path: Root: Compromise Application using Aspects [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This is the ultimate attacker goal and the starting point for all high-risk attack paths. Success at this root node means the attacker has achieved their objective of compromising the application through Aspects.
  • Why Critical: Represents the highest level objective and aggregates all successful attack paths.

Attack Tree Path: OR 1: Inject Malicious Aspect [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: This critical node represents the primary high-risk attack vector: injecting malicious aspects into the application. Success here directly leads to code execution within the application context.

  • Why Critical & High-Risk: Directly achieves the attacker's goal. Branches into multiple high-risk sub-paths. High impact due to potential for arbitrary code execution.

    • Attack Vectors:
      • Supply Malicious Aspect via Configuration (1.1)
      • Compromise Development Environment/Supply Chain (1.3)
      • Social Engineering to Induce Malicious Aspect Addition (1.4)

Attack Tree Path: OR 1.1: Supply Malicious Aspect via Configuration [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: Attackers exploit vulnerabilities in the application's configuration system to inject malicious aspect definitions. If the application loads aspect configurations from external sources, compromising these sources allows for aspect injection.
  • Attack Scenario:
    • Attacker gains unauthorized access to the configuration storage (e.g., configuration files, remote configuration server, database).
    • Attacker modifies the configuration data to include malicious aspect definitions. These definitions contain code designed to execute malicious actions when the targeted methods are called.
    • The application loads the modified configuration, registers the malicious aspects, and executes the malicious code when the aspect's pointcut is triggered.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Secure Configuration Storage: Implement strong access controls to protect configuration files and systems. Use role-based access control and the principle of least privilege.
    • Configuration System Security: Harden the configuration system itself. If using a remote server, ensure it is securely configured and patched.
    • Input Validation for Aspect Definitions: Thoroughly validate and sanitize aspect definitions loaded from configuration. Use a strict schema for aspect configurations and reject any definitions that do not conform.
    • Integrity Checks: Implement integrity checks (e.g., checksums, digital signatures) for configuration files to detect unauthorized modifications.
    • Regular Auditing: Regularly audit access to configuration systems and monitor for suspicious modifications.

Attack Tree Path: OR 1.3: Compromise Development Environment/Supply Chain [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: Attackers target the development environment or the software supply chain to inject malicious aspects directly into the application codebase during the build or deployment process.
  • Attack Scenario:
    • Attacker compromises a developer's machine, a build server, or a component of the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Attacker modifies the application's source code or build scripts to include malicious aspect definitions. This could involve directly adding malicious aspect code or modifying existing aspect configurations within the codebase.
    • The compromised build process compiles and packages the application with the injected malicious aspects.
    • The application is deployed with the malicious aspects, which will execute when the application runs in the target environment.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Secure Developer Machines: Enforce endpoint security measures on developer machines, including strong passwords, multi-factor authentication, endpoint detection and response (EDR) software, and regular security patching.
    • CI/CD Pipeline Security: Secure the CI/CD pipeline with strong authentication and authorization at each stage. Implement code signing to ensure the integrity of build artifacts. Use secure build environments and isolate build processes.
    • Supply Chain Security: Maintain an inventory of all software dependencies and third-party libraries. Regularly audit and update dependencies to patch known vulnerabilities. Implement vulnerability scanning for dependencies.
    • Code Review and Version Control: Enforce mandatory code review for all code changes, especially those related to aspects. Use version control systems and track all changes to the codebase.
    • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of the development environment and CI/CD pipeline to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: OR 1.4: Social Engineering to Induce Malicious Aspect Addition [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: Attackers use social engineering techniques to manipulate developers or administrators into adding malicious aspect code to the application, often disguised as legitimate functionality.
  • Attack Scenario:
    • Attacker identifies a target developer or administrator within the development team.
    • Attacker uses social engineering tactics (e.g., phishing, pretexting, impersonation) to build trust and manipulate the target.
    • Attacker convinces the target to add a seemingly harmless aspect to the application. This aspect, however, contains malicious code designed to execute attacker's objectives.
    • The developer or administrator, believing the request is legitimate, adds the malicious aspect to the codebase or configuration.
    • The application is built and deployed with the malicious aspect, which will execute when the application runs.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Security Awareness Training: Provide comprehensive security awareness training to all developers and administrators, focusing on social engineering tactics, phishing awareness, and secure coding practices.
    • Code Review Processes: Implement mandatory code review processes for all code changes, especially for aspect additions. Ensure code reviews are performed by multiple developers and focus on security implications.
    • Verification and Validation: Encourage developers to verify the legitimacy of requests to add or modify code, especially if they come from unfamiliar or unusual sources.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Grant developers and administrators only the necessary permissions to minimize the impact of compromised accounts. Limit access to sensitive systems and code repositories.
    • Incident Response Plan: Develop and maintain an incident response plan to handle potential social engineering attacks and code injection incidents.