Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
261 lines (212 loc) · 13.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

261 lines (212 loc) · 13.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for steipete/aspects

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Aspect Source Control and Review

Description:

  1. Store all aspect code in a dedicated, secure, version-controlled repository (e.g., a private Git repository).
  2. Establish a branch protection policy requiring at least one code review from a designated security reviewer before aspect code changes can be merged.
  3. The security reviewer should specifically examine the aspect code for:
    • Injection vulnerabilities: Unsanitized input used in pointcut expressions or aspect logic.
    • Unintended side effects: Interactions with other aspects or core code.
    • Privilege escalation: Aspects modifying methods with higher privileges than the caller.
    • Denial-of-service: Infinite loops, excessive resource consumption within the aspect.
    • Coding standards adherence: Ensuring the aspect code itself is well-written and maintainable.
  4. Maintain an audit log of all aspect code changes (who, when, why).
  5. Regularly (e.g., quarterly) conduct a comprehensive security audit of all existing aspects.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Code Injection/Modification at Runtime (Severity: Critical): Prevents malicious aspects.
  • Unexpected Behavior Changes (Severity: High): Reduces subtle bugs from aspect interactions.
  • Obfuscation of Control Flow (Severity: Medium): Improves auditability of aspect changes.
  • Privilege Escalation (Indirectly) (Severity: High): Prevents aspects from gaining unauthorized access.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: High): Reduces aspects causing instability.

Impact:

  • Code Injection/Modification: Risk significantly reduced (Critical to Low).
  • Unexpected Behavior Changes: Risk reduced (High to Medium).
  • Obfuscation of Control Flow: Risk reduced (Medium to Low).
  • Privilege Escalation: Risk significantly reduced (High to Low).
  • Denial of Service: Risk reduced (High to Medium).

Currently Implemented:

  • Aspect code in a private Git repository.
  • Basic code reviews required.

Missing Implementation:

  • No consistent, dedicated security reviewer for aspect code.
  • No regular, comprehensive security audits of existing aspects.
  • Audit log lacks sufficient detail (reasons for changes).

Mitigation Strategy: Limited and Controlled Aspect Application

Description:

  1. Define pointcuts with maximum precision. Use specific class names, method names, and parameter types. Avoid wildcards (*) and broad selectors.
  2. Create a whitelist of approved aspects in a secure configuration file (e.g., aspects_whitelist.yml). This file should be:
    • Stored with restricted access (read-only for the application user).
    • Digitally signed or checksummed to prevent tampering.
    • Validated before use.
  3. The application should only load and apply aspects present in the whitelist.
  4. Log and block any attempt to load or apply an unapproved aspect.
  5. If possible, use compile-time weaving of aspects to reduce the runtime attack surface.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Code Injection/Modification at Runtime (Severity: Critical): Prevents unauthorized aspects.
  • Unexpected Behavior Changes (Severity: High): Limits the scope of aspect influence.
  • Privilege Escalation (Indirectly) (Severity: High): Restricts aspects modifying sensitive methods.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: High): Makes it harder to inject resource-exhausting aspects.

Impact:

  • Code Injection/Modification: Risk significantly reduced (Critical to Low).
  • Unexpected Behavior Changes: Risk reduced (High to Medium).
  • Privilege Escalation: Risk significantly reduced (High to Low).
  • Denial of Service: Risk reduced (High to Medium).

Currently Implemented:

  • Pointcuts are generally specific, but some wildcards are used.

Missing Implementation:

  • No whitelist of approved aspects.
  • No mechanism to prevent unapproved aspect application.
  • Compile-time weaving is not used.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization (Within Aspects)

Description:

  1. Within each aspect, before using method parameters or modifying return values, perform thorough validation and sanitization.
  2. String parameters:
    • Check length.
    • Validate against expected patterns (regex).
    • Escape/encode special characters (HTML, SQL, JavaScript).
  3. Numeric parameters:
    • Check valid ranges (min/max).
    • Ensure correct data type.
  4. Object parameters:
    • Validate object type.
    • Check for nulls.
    • Validate object fields if needed.
  5. If modifying a return value, ensure it adheres to the same validation rules as the original.
  6. Log all validation failures (aspect name, method name, invalid input).

Threats Mitigated:

  • Code Injection/Modification at Runtime (Severity: Critical): Prevents injecting code via parameters.
  • Unexpected Behavior Changes (Severity: High): Ensures aspects operate on valid data.
  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (Severity: High): Prevents XSS if the aspect handles web data.
  • SQL Injection (Severity: Critical): Prevents SQL injection if the aspect handles database queries.
  • Other Injection Attacks (Severity: High/Critical): Mitigates various injection attacks.

Impact:

  • Code Injection/Modification: Risk significantly reduced (Critical to Low).
  • Unexpected Behavior Changes: Risk reduced (High to Medium).
  • XSS/SQL Injection/Other: Risk significantly reduced (High/Critical to Low).

Currently Implemented:

  • Some aspects have basic input validation, but it's inconsistent.

Missing Implementation:

  • Comprehensive validation/sanitization is missing in several aspects (especially those handling user data).
  • No centralized logging of validation failures within aspects.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Aspect Configuration and Loading

Description:

  1. If aspects are loaded dynamically, store files in a dedicated directory with restricted access. Only the application user should have read access; no write access.
  2. If a configuration file defines loaded aspects, it must also be stored securely with restricted access.
  3. Before loading the configuration file, verify its integrity using a checksum (e.g., SHA-256) or digital signature. Compare against a known good value.
  4. If the checksum/signature doesn't match, do not load the file and log an error.
  5. Implement robust error handling in the aspect loading mechanism:
    • Log detailed errors.
    • Do not crash or become unstable.
    • Continue functioning (possibly with reduced functionality).
  6. Never allow aspects to be loaded or configured from untrusted sources (user input, external websites, uncontrolled network shares).

Threats Mitigated:

  • Code Injection/Modification at Runtime (Severity: Critical): Prevents replacing aspect/config files with malicious versions.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: High): Prevents crashes from invalid aspect files.

Impact:

  • Code Injection/Modification: Risk significantly reduced (Critical to Low).
  • Denial of Service: Risk reduced (High to Medium).

Currently Implemented:

  • Aspect files are in a dedicated directory.

Missing Implementation:

  • Access permissions are not sufficiently restrictive.
  • No checksum/signature validation.
  • Error handling in aspect loading is not robust.
  • Potential for loading from network shares (not currently done, but possible).

Mitigation Strategy: Principle of Least Privilege (for Aspects)

Description:

  1. Identify the specific permissions each aspect needs.
  2. Grant only those permissions. Avoid broad permissions.
  3. If an aspect accesses a database, use a dedicated user account with minimal privileges (e.g., read-only to specific tables).
  4. If an aspect uses an external service, use a dedicated API key/service account with limited permissions.
  5. Regularly review and revoke unnecessary aspect permissions.
  6. Use a security context or sandbox (if available) to restrict aspect capabilities.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Privilege Escalation (Indirectly) (Severity: High): Limits damage if an aspect is compromised.
  • Data Breaches (Severity: High): Reduces aspects accessing unneeded sensitive data.

Impact:

  • Privilege Escalation: Risk significantly reduced (High to Low).
  • Data Breaches: Risk reduced (High to Medium).

Currently Implemented:

  • No specific restrictions on aspect permissions.

Missing Implementation:

  • Aspects run with the main application's excessive privileges.
  • No dedicated database users/API keys for aspects accessing external resources.

Mitigation Strategy: Comprehensive Logging and Auditing (of Aspect Activity)

Description:

  1. Use a centralized logging system to capture all relevant aspect activity.
  2. For each aspect application, log:
    • Aspect's fully qualified name.
    • Target method's fully qualified name.
    • Timestamp.
    • Method parameter values (after validation/sanitization).
    • Modifications to the return value.
    • Exceptions/errors within the aspect's code.
  3. Log messages should be:
    • Clear and concise.
    • Include sufficient context.
    • Consistently formatted.
  4. Store logs securely, with restricted access.
  5. Regularly review logs for suspicious activity:
    • Unexpected aspect applications.
    • Invalid input.
    • Frequent errors.
  6. Implement alerts for critical events (failed aspect applications, security violations).

Threats Mitigated:

  • Code Injection/Modification at Runtime (Severity: Critical): Provides an audit trail for malicious activity.
  • Unexpected Behavior Changes (Severity: High): Helps diagnose the root cause.
  • Obfuscation of Control Flow (Severity: Medium): Improves understanding of execution flow.
  • Data Breaches (Severity: High): Can help identify unauthorized data access.

Impact:

  • Code Injection/Modification: Improves detection/investigation.
  • Unexpected Behavior Changes: Improves diagnostics.
  • Obfuscation of Control Flow: Improves understanding.
  • Data Breaches: Improves detection/investigation.

Currently Implemented:

  • Basic logging for some aspects, but not comprehensive/consistent.

Missing Implementation:

  • No centralized logging for aspect activity.
  • Incomplete/inconsistent log messages.
  • No regular log review.
  • No alerts for critical events.

Mitigation Strategy: Security Testing Focused on Aspects

Description:

  1. Fuzzing: Provide varied inputs (valid, invalid, boundary) to methods affected by aspects. Monitor for errors, crashes, or unexpected results.
  2. Penetration Testing: Simulate attacks targeting aspects:
    • Injecting malicious aspects.
    • Exploiting aspect logic vulnerabilities.
    • Bypassing aspect-implemented security controls.
  3. Static Analysis: Use tools aware of AOP to find vulnerabilities in aspect code (unvalidated input, insecure API use, privilege escalation).
  4. Dynamic Analysis: Monitor aspect behavior at runtime to detect:
    • Unexpected method calls.
    • Memory issues.
    • Security policy violations.
  5. Integrate these tests into the CI/CD pipeline for automatic testing with every code change.

Threats Mitigated:

  • All identified threats (Severity: Varies): Proactively identifies and fixes vulnerabilities.

Impact:

  • All Threats: Significantly reduces vulnerability risk.

Currently Implemented:

  • Basic unit tests for some aspects, but no security focus.

Missing Implementation:

  • No fuzzing, penetration testing, static analysis, or dynamic analysis targeting aspects.
  • No security test integration into CI/CD.

Mitigation Strategy: Fail-Safe Mechanisms

Description:

  1. Implement a global "disable aspects" switch (config setting/environment variable) for quick disabling in emergencies.
  2. Implement a way to disable individual aspects (remove from whitelist, comment out in config).
  3. In aspects with resource-intensive operations (database queries, network requests), use circuit breakers or rate limiting to prevent resource exhaustion/DoS.
  4. Consider a "safe mode" that disables all non-essential aspects.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: High): Limits the impact of resource-exhausting aspects.
  • Unexpected Behavior Changes (Severity: High): Provides quick recovery from aspect-caused issues.
  • Code Injection/Modification at Runtime (Severity: Critical): Enables rapid response to malicious aspects.

Impact:

  • Denial of Service: Risk significantly reduced (High to Low).
  • Unexpected Behavior Changes: Improves recovery time/reduces impact.
  • Code Injection/Modification: Improves response time/limits damage.

Currently Implemented:

  • No mechanisms to quickly disable aspects.

Missing Implementation:

  • No global "disable aspects" switch.
  • No easy way to disable individual aspects.
  • No circuit breakers/rate limiting.
  • No "safe mode."