Objective: Gain unauthorized access to application data/functionality or disrupt service via F3 vulnerabilities.
Attacker's Goal: Gain unauthorized access to application data/functionality or disrupt service via F3 vulnerabilities.
├── 1. Exploit Template Engine (Template) Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK]
│ ├── 1.1 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Template Injection [HIGH RISK]
│ │ ├── 1.1.1 Insufficient Input Sanitization in Template Variables [CRITICAL]
│ │ └── 1.1.2 Exploiting `raw` filter misuse [CRITICAL]
│ ├── 1.2 Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) [HIGH RISK]
│ │ └── 1.2.1 User-controlled input directly influencing template file selection or content. [CRITICAL]
│ └── 1.3 Local File Inclusion (LFI) via Template Paths
│ └── 1.3.1 User-controlled input manipulating template paths to access arbitrary files. [CRITICAL]
├── 2. Exploit Routing Vulnerabilities
│ ├── 2.1 Route Hijacking / Parameter Tampering [HIGH RISK]
│ │ └── 2.1.1 Manipulating route parameters to access unauthorized resources or execute unintended actions. [CRITICAL]
│ └── 2.2 Denial of Service (DoS) via Route Flooding [HIGH RISK]
│ └── 2.2.1 Sending a large number of requests to a specific route, overwhelming the application. [CRITICAL]
├── 3. Exploit Database Abstraction Layer (DB) Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK]
│ ├── 3.1 SQL Injection (if using F3's DB layer) [HIGH RISK]
│ │ └── 3.1.1 Insufficient input sanitization in database queries. [CRITICAL]
│ └── 3.2 NoSQL Injection (if using a NoSQL database with F3)
│ └── 3.2.1 Similar to SQL Injection, but targeting NoSQL query languages. [CRITICAL]
├── 5. Exploit Session Management Vulnerabilities
├── 5.2 Session Hijacking [HIGH RISK]
└── 5.2.1 Stealing a valid session ID. [CRITICAL]
├── 5.1 Session Fixation
└── 5.1.1 Setting a known session ID for a victim. [CRITICAL]
Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Template Engine (Template) Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK]
-
1.1 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Template Injection [HIGH RISK]
- 1.1.1 Insufficient Input Sanitization in Template Variables [CRITICAL]
- Description: Attackers inject malicious JavaScript code into template variables that are not properly escaped before being rendered in the HTML output.
- Attack Vector: User input (e.g., form fields, URL parameters) is directly used in template variables without proper sanitization or encoding.
- Example: If a template has
{{ @userInput }}
, and@userInput
contains<script>alert('XSS')</script>
, the script will execute in the user's browser. - Mitigation: Consistently use F3's escaping functions (e.g.,
{{ @variable | esc }}
) for all template variables that might contain user input. Implement a strong Content Security Policy (CSP).
- 1.1.2 Exploiting
raw
filter misuse [CRITICAL]- Description: The
raw
filter in F3's template engine disables escaping, making it a prime target for XSS attacks if used improperly. - Attack Vector: Developers use the
raw
filter on user-supplied data without performing rigorous input validation before using the filter. - Example:
{{ @userInput | raw }}
with malicious@userInput
will inject the raw, unescaped content. - Mitigation: Avoid using
raw
whenever possible. If it's absolutely necessary, implement extremely strict input validation before applying theraw
filter. Consider alternative approaches that don't require disabling escaping.
- Description: The
- 1.1.1 Insufficient Input Sanitization in Template Variables [CRITICAL]
-
1.2 Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) [HIGH RISK]
- 1.2.1 User-controlled input directly influencing template file selection or content. [CRITICAL]
- Description: Attackers manipulate user input to control which template file is loaded or to inject arbitrary code into the template itself, leading to remote code execution.
- Attack Vector: User input is used to construct the template file path or is directly embedded within the template content without proper sanitization.
- Example: If the application uses
render('templates/' . $_GET['page'] . '.html')
, an attacker could supplypage=../../../../etc/passwd
to attempt an LFI attack, or inject template engine directives to execute code. - Mitigation: Never allow user input to directly determine the template file path. Use a whitelist of allowed template names. Sanitize all user input used within templates, even if it's not directly controlling the file path.
- 1.2.1 User-controlled input directly influencing template file selection or content. [CRITICAL]
-
1.3 Local File Inclusion (LFI) via Template Paths
- 1.3.1 User-controlled input manipulating template paths to access arbitrary files. [CRITICAL]
- Description: Attackers manipulate user-supplied input that is used to construct template file paths, allowing them to access files outside the intended template directory.
- Attack Vector: Similar to SSTI (1.2.1), but the goal is to read arbitrary files on the server rather than execute code within the template engine.
- Example: If the application loads templates based on user input without proper validation, an attacker could try to access
/etc/passwd
or other sensitive files. - Mitigation: Never allow user input to directly construct template paths. Use a whitelist of allowed template directories and filenames. Implement strict path validation to prevent directory traversal attacks (e.g., using
../
).
- 1.3.1 User-controlled input manipulating template paths to access arbitrary files. [CRITICAL]
Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Routing Vulnerabilities
-
2.1 Route Hijacking / Parameter Tampering [HIGH RISK]
- 2.1.1 Manipulating route parameters to access unauthorized resources or execute unintended actions. [CRITICAL]
- Description: Attackers modify URL parameters or other route data to bypass access controls or trigger unintended behavior in the application.
- Attack Vector: The application relies solely on route definitions for security, without performing additional authorization checks within the route handlers.
- Example: If a route is defined as
/user/{id}
, an attacker might change the{id}
to access another user's data. - Mitigation: Implement strict input validation and authorization checks within each route handler. Don't rely solely on route definitions for security. Use parameterized queries for database interactions within route handlers.
- 2.1.1 Manipulating route parameters to access unauthorized resources or execute unintended actions. [CRITICAL]
-
2.2 Denial of Service (DoS) via Route Flooding [HIGH RISK]
- 2.2.1 Sending a large number of requests to a specific route, overwhelming the application. [CRITICAL]
- Description: Attackers send a massive number of requests to a particular route, consuming server resources and making the application unavailable to legitimate users.
- Attack Vector: The application lacks rate limiting or other DoS protection mechanisms.
- Example: Repeatedly requesting a resource-intensive route (e.g., one that performs complex database queries or image processing) can overwhelm the server.
- Mitigation: Implement rate limiting on all routes, especially those that perform resource-intensive operations. Use a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to mitigate DDoS attacks.
- 2.2.1 Sending a large number of requests to a specific route, overwhelming the application. [CRITICAL]
Attack Tree Path: 3. Exploit Database Abstraction Layer (DB) Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK]
-
3.1 SQL Injection (if using F3's DB layer) [HIGH RISK]
- 3.1.1 Insufficient input sanitization in database queries. [CRITICAL]
- Description: Attackers inject malicious SQL code into database queries through user input, allowing them to read, modify, or delete data, or even execute arbitrary commands on the database server.
- Attack Vector: User input is directly concatenated into SQL queries without proper sanitization or parameterization.
- Example:
$db->exec("SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '" . $_GET['username'] . "'");
is vulnerable if$_GET['username']
is not properly sanitized. - Mitigation: Always use parameterized queries or prepared statements. Never construct SQL queries by concatenating user input.
- 3.1.1 Insufficient input sanitization in database queries. [CRITICAL]
-
3.2 NoSQL Injection (if using a NoSQL database with F3)
- 3.2.1 Similar to SQL Injection, but targeting NoSQL query languages. [CRITICAL]
- Description: Attackers inject malicious code into NoSQL queries, exploiting vulnerabilities in the NoSQL database's query language.
- Attack Vector: User input is used to construct NoSQL queries without proper sanitization.
- Example: Similar to SQL injection, but the injected code would be specific to the NoSQL database being used (e.g., MongoDB, CouchDB).
- Mitigation: Use appropriate sanitization and validation techniques for the specific NoSQL database. Avoid dynamic query construction with user input. Use the database driver's built-in mechanisms for safe query building.
- 3.2.1 Similar to SQL Injection, but targeting NoSQL query languages. [CRITICAL]
Attack Tree Path: 5. Exploit Session Management Vulnerabilities
-
5.2 Session Hijacking [HIGH RISK]
- 5.2.1 Stealing a valid session ID. [CRITICAL]
- Description: An attacker obtains a legitimate user's session ID, allowing them to impersonate the user and gain access to their account.
- Attack Vector: Session IDs are exposed through insecure channels (e.g., HTTP, URLs), or are predictable, or are vulnerable to sniffing on an insecure network.
- Example: An attacker might use a packet sniffer on an unencrypted Wi-Fi network to capture session cookies.
- Mitigation: Use HTTPS for all communication. Set the
HttpOnly
andSecure
flags on session cookies. Implement session timeout mechanisms. Use strong, randomly generated session IDs.
- 5.2.1 Stealing a valid session ID. [CRITICAL]
-
5.1 Session Fixation
- 5.1.1 Setting a known session ID for a victim. [CRITICAL]
- Description: Attacker sets session ID for victim, and when victim authenticates, attacker uses the known session ID to hijack the account.
- Attack Vector: Application accepts session identifiers from URL parameters or POST data without proper validation or regeneration after authentication.
- Example: Attacker sends a link with a predefined session ID to the victim. When the victim logs in, the attacker uses the same session ID to access the victim's account.
- Mitigation: Regenerate session IDs after authentication. Use F3's built-in session management features correctly. Ensure session IDs are not exposed in URLs or other insecure locations.
- 5.1.1 Setting a known session ID for a victim. [CRITICAL]