Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
166 lines (135 loc) · 14.7 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

166 lines (135 loc) · 14.7 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of Cachet based on the provided design review.

Deep Security Analysis of Cachet

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The primary objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security assessment of Cachet's key components, identifying potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses that could be exploited by attackers. This includes analyzing the application's architecture, data flow, security controls, and deployment model to provide actionable recommendations for improving Cachet's security posture. We will focus on:

  • Authentication and Authorization: How Cachet manages user identities and permissions.
  • Input Validation and Output Encoding: How Cachet handles user-provided data to prevent injection attacks.
  • Data Protection: How Cachet protects sensitive data at rest and in transit.
  • Dependency Management: How Cachet manages third-party libraries and their associated risks.
  • Deployment Security: How Cachet is deployed and the security implications of the chosen deployment model.
  • Integration Security: How Cachet interacts with external services and the associated security considerations.

Scope:

This analysis covers the Cachet application itself, its core components (as described in the C4 diagrams), its build process, and its typical Docker-based deployment. It does not cover the security of the underlying operating system, network infrastructure, or third-party services beyond the direct interactions with Cachet. We will focus on the latest stable version of Cachet available on GitHub.

Methodology:

  1. Architecture Review: Analyze the provided C4 diagrams and documentation to understand Cachet's architecture, components, and data flow.
  2. Code Review (Inferred): Based on the knowledge of Laravel and common security practices, we will infer potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the codebase. We do not have direct access to the code, but we can make educated assumptions based on the framework and described functionality.
  3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats and attack vectors based on the identified components and data flows. We will use a combination of STRIDE and OWASP Top 10 to guide this process.
  4. Security Control Analysis: Evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls and identify gaps.
  5. Mitigation Recommendations: Provide specific, actionable recommendations to address the identified vulnerabilities and weaknesses.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component, referencing the security controls and potential threats:

  • Web Server (Nginx/Apache):

    • Security Controls: HTTPS configuration, WAF (if applicable), access controls.
    • Threats:
      • Misconfiguration: Incorrectly configured SSL/TLS (weak ciphers, expired certificates) leading to Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks.
      • Vulnerabilities: Exploitable vulnerabilities in the web server software itself.
      • DoS/DDoS: Denial-of-service attacks targeting the web server.
    • Mitigation:
      • Use a well-vetted web server configuration template (e.g., from Mozilla's SSL Configuration Generator).
      • Regularly update the web server software to the latest stable version.
      • Implement a WAF and configure it to protect against common web attacks.
      • Implement rate limiting and connection limits to mitigate DoS/DDoS attacks.

  • Cachet Application (Laravel/PHP):

    • Security Controls: Authentication, Authorization, Input Validation, CSRF Protection, Rate Limiting, Session Management.
    • Threats:
      • Authentication Bypass: Weak password policies, lack of 2FA, vulnerabilities in Laravel's authentication mechanisms.
      • Authorization Bypass: Incorrectly implemented RBAC, allowing users to access unauthorized resources or perform unauthorized actions.
      • SQL Injection: Insufficient input validation allowing attackers to inject malicious SQL code.
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Insufficient input validation and output encoding allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Exploiting CSRF vulnerabilities to perform actions on behalf of authenticated users.
      • Remote Code Execution (RCE): Vulnerabilities in the application code or dependencies allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code on the server.
      • Session Hijacking: Stealing or manipulating user sessions.
      • Insecure Deserialization: Exploiting vulnerabilities in how Cachet handles deserialized data.
    • Mitigation:
      • Enforce strong password policies and implement 2FA for administrative accounts.
      • Thoroughly review and test Laravel's authorization mechanisms (policies/gates) to ensure they are correctly implemented.
      • Use Laravel's Eloquent ORM and query builder to prevent SQL injection, and avoid raw SQL queries whenever possible. Parametrize all queries.
      • Use Laravel's built-in validation rules and output encoding functions (e.g., e() helper) to prevent XSS. Implement a strict Content Security Policy (CSP).
      • Ensure CSRF protection is enabled and properly configured.
      • Regularly update Laravel and all dependencies to the latest stable versions. Use a dependency vulnerability scanner (e.g., Composer audit, Snyk).
      • Implement robust input validation for all user-supplied data, including data from third-party integrations.
      • Use secure session management practices (e.g., HTTPS-only cookies, secure session storage).
      • Avoid using PHP's unserialize() function on untrusted data. If necessary, use a safer alternative like JSON.

  • Database (MySQL/PostgreSQL/SQLite):

    • Security Controls: Database user authentication, access controls, encryption (if applicable).
    • Threats:
      • SQL Injection: (See above)
      • Unauthorized Access: Weak database credentials, misconfigured access controls.
      • Data Breach: Direct access to the database files (especially for SQLite).
    • Mitigation:
      • Use strong, unique passwords for database users.
      • Grant only the necessary privileges to the database user used by Cachet (principle of least privilege).
      • Configure the database server to listen only on localhost or a private network interface, not publicly accessible.
      • For SQLite, ensure the database file is stored outside the web root and has appropriate file permissions.
      • Consider using database encryption at rest, especially for sensitive data.

  • Cache (Redis/Memcached):

    • Security Controls: Access controls, authentication (if applicable).
    • Threats:
      • Unauthorized Access: Weak or no authentication, misconfigured access controls.
      • Data Exposure: Sensitive data stored in the cache could be exposed if the cache server is compromised.
    • Mitigation:
      • Configure the cache server to listen only on localhost or a private network interface.
      • Enable authentication for Redis (if used).
      • Avoid storing sensitive data in the cache if possible. If necessary, encrypt the data before storing it in the cache.

  • Third-Party Service Integrations:

    • Security Controls: API Authentication (e.g., API keys, OAuth), Input Validation.
    • Threats:
      • API Key Compromise: Leakage or theft of API keys.
      • Data Injection: Malicious data injected through the third-party service.
      • Availability Issues: The third-party service becoming unavailable, impacting Cachet's functionality.
    • Mitigation:
      • Store API keys securely using environment variables or a dedicated secrets management solution. Do not hardcode API keys in the codebase.
      • Implement robust input validation for all data received from third-party services. Treat this data as untrusted.
      • Implement error handling and fallback mechanisms to handle cases where the third-party service is unavailable.
      • Use HTTPS for all communication with third-party services.

  • Email Service:

    • Security Controls: Secure communication (TLS), API Authentication (if applicable).
    • Threats:
      • Email Spoofing: Attackers sending emails that appear to be from Cachet.
      • Spam: Cachet being used to send spam emails.
    • Mitigation:
      • Use a reputable email service provider with strong security measures.
      • Configure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records to prevent email spoofing.
      • Implement rate limiting for email sending to prevent abuse.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

Based on the C4 diagrams and the description of Cachet, we can infer the following:

  • Architecture: Cachet follows a typical Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, leveraging the Laravel framework.
  • Components: The key components are the web server, the Cachet application (including controllers, models, views, and service providers), the database, and the cache.
  • Data Flow:
    1. A user (either a regular user or an administrator) makes a request to the web server.
    2. The web server forwards the request to the Cachet application.
    3. The Cachet application processes the request, potentially interacting with the database and cache.
    4. The Cachet application returns a response to the web server.
    5. The web server sends the response to the user.
    6. For third-party integrations, the Cachet application makes requests to the third-party service's API, receives data, and processes it.
    7. For email notifications, the Cachet application sends data to the email service, which then sends the email to the subscribers.

4. Security Considerations Tailored to Cachet

  • Incident Description Sanitization: Since incident descriptions are often entered by administrators, it's crucial to ensure proper sanitization and output encoding to prevent XSS vulnerabilities. This is a high-priority area. Consider using a Markdown parser with built-in XSS protection, or a dedicated HTML sanitization library.
  • Metric Data Validation: If Cachet allows users to input custom metric data, rigorous validation is needed to prevent injection attacks and ensure data integrity.
  • Subscriber Management: Subscriber email addresses should be treated as sensitive data and protected accordingly. Implement proper access controls and consider encryption. Ensure compliance with privacy regulations (e.g., GDPR).
  • API Security: If Cachet exposes an API, it should be secured with authentication (e.g., API keys, OAuth) and authorization. Implement rate limiting and input validation for all API endpoints.
  • Configuration Management: Emphasize the importance of secure configuration in the documentation. Provide clear instructions on how to configure the web server, database, cache, and other components securely. Recommend using environment variables for sensitive settings.
  • Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Strongly recommend implementing 2FA for administrative accounts. This adds a significant layer of security against credential-based attacks.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

Here are specific, actionable mitigation strategies, prioritized based on their impact and feasibility:

High Priority:

  1. Implement 2FA: Add two-factor authentication for all administrative accounts. This is the single most impactful change to improve security. Use a library like pragmarx/google2fa-laravel.
  2. Enforce CSP: Implement a strict Content Security Policy (CSP) to mitigate XSS and data injection attacks. Use Laravel's spatie/laravel-csp package or similar.
  3. Audit Dependencies: Regularly audit PHP (Composer) and JavaScript (npm/Yarn) dependencies for known vulnerabilities. Use composer audit and npm audit (or yarn audit). Automate this process as part of the build pipeline.
  4. Review Input Validation: Thoroughly review all input validation rules, especially for incident descriptions, component names, and metric data. Ensure that validation is strict and specific to the expected data type.
  5. Sanitize Incident Descriptions: Implement robust HTML sanitization for incident descriptions. Use a well-vetted library like HTML Purifier or a Markdown parser with built-in XSS protection.
  6. Harden Web Server Config: Use a secure web server configuration template (e.g., from Mozilla's SSL Configuration Generator) and ensure HTTPS is enforced.

Medium Priority:

  1. Implement HSTS: Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to enforce HTTPS connections.
  2. Implement SRI: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for included scripts and stylesheets.
  3. Secure Database Configuration: Ensure the database server is configured securely, with strong passwords, limited network access, and appropriate user privileges.
  4. Secure Cache Configuration: Ensure the cache server is configured securely, with authentication enabled (if applicable) and limited network access.
  5. Review API Security: If Cachet has an API, ensure it is secured with authentication and authorization. Implement rate limiting and input validation.
  6. Improve Session Management: Review and strengthen session management practices. Use HTTPS-only cookies, secure session storage, and consider implementing session expiration and rotation.

Low Priority:

  1. Implement a WAF: Consider implementing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to provide an additional layer of protection.
  2. Enhance Logging and Monitoring: Implement robust logging and monitoring to detect and respond to security incidents. Log all security-relevant events, such as failed login attempts, authorization failures, and changes to system settings.
  3. Security Hardening Guidelines: Provide detailed security hardening guidelines in the documentation, covering server configuration, database security, and network security.
  4. Penetration Testing: Conduct regular penetration testing to identify vulnerabilities that may have been missed during the code review and threat modeling.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for Cachet. By implementing these mitigation strategies, the development team can significantly improve the security posture of the application and protect it from a wide range of threats. Remember that security is an ongoing process, and regular reviews and updates are essential to maintain a strong security posture.