Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
290 lines (235 loc) · 25.8 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

290 lines (235 loc) · 25.8 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Coolify Platform

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep security analysis is to identify potential security vulnerabilities and risks within the Coolify platform based on the provided security design review and inferred architecture. This analysis aims to provide actionable and tailored mitigation strategies to enhance the security posture of Coolify, focusing on protecting user data, platform integrity, and the self-hosted infrastructure it manages. The analysis will thoroughly examine key components, data flows, and deployment architectures to pinpoint specific security weaknesses and recommend practical improvements.

Scope:

This analysis covers the following components and aspects of the Coolify platform, as outlined in the security design review:

  • C4 Context Diagram Components: Coolify Platform, End Users, Git Repositories, Container Registries, Database Servers, SMTP Servers, DNS Providers.
  • C4 Container Diagram Components: Nginx, Coolify API, Job Queue (Redis), Worker Processes, Database (PostgreSQL).
  • Deployment Architecture (Docker Compose - Single Server): Docker Host OS, Nginx Container, Coolify API Container, Redis Container, Worker Container, PostgreSQL Container.
  • Build Process: Developer, Code Repository, CI/CD Pipeline, Build Process, Security Checks, Container Image Registry.
  • Security Posture: Existing and Recommended Security Controls, Security Requirements (Authentication, Authorization, Input Validation, Cryptography).
  • Risk Assessment: Critical Business Processes, Data Sensitivity.

The analysis will focus on the security implications of these components and their interactions, considering the self-hosted nature of Coolify and its target users. It will not cover a full penetration test or source code audit, but rather a security design review based on the provided documentation and architectural understanding.

Methodology:

This deep security analysis will employ a threat modeling approach combined with a component-based security review. The methodology involves the following steps:

  1. Architecture Decomposition: Break down the Coolify platform into its key components based on the C4 diagrams and deployment descriptions.
  2. Threat Identification: For each component and data flow, identify potential security threats and vulnerabilities. This will be based on common web application security risks (OWASP Top 10), container security best practices, and vulnerabilities relevant to the specific technologies used (Node.js, PostgreSQL, Redis, Docker, Nginx).
  3. Risk Assessment: Evaluate the identified threats based on their potential impact and likelihood, considering the business posture and data sensitivity outlined in the security design review.
  4. Mitigation Strategy Development: For each significant threat, develop actionable and tailored mitigation strategies specific to Coolify. These strategies will align with the recommended security controls and security requirements outlined in the design review.
  5. Prioritization and Recommendations: Prioritize the mitigation strategies based on risk level and feasibility, providing clear and actionable recommendations for the Coolify development team.

This methodology will ensure a structured and comprehensive security analysis focused on the specific context of the Coolify platform and its self-hosted deployment model.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

2.1. C4 Context Diagram Components

  • Coolify Platform:

    • Security Implication: As the central component, vulnerabilities in the Coolify Platform directly impact the security of all managed applications and infrastructure. Compromise of the platform could lead to full control over user deployments, data breaches, and denial of service.
    • Specific Threats:
      • Authentication and Authorization Bypass: Weaknesses in user authentication or RBAC could allow unauthorized access to the platform and its functionalities.
      • API Vulnerabilities: Unsecured API endpoints could be exploited for data manipulation, privilege escalation, or service disruption.
      • Configuration Vulnerabilities: Misconfigurations in the platform's settings or dependencies could expose sensitive information or create attack vectors.
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Outdated or vulnerable dependencies in the platform's codebase could be exploited.

  • End Users:

    • Security Implication: User accounts are the entry point to the Coolify platform. Compromised user accounts can lead to unauthorized access and control over deployments.
    • Specific Threats:
      • Weak Passwords: Users choosing weak passwords can be vulnerable to brute-force attacks.
      • Phishing Attacks: Users could be tricked into revealing their credentials through phishing attempts.
      • Account Takeover: Compromised user accounts can be used to deploy malicious applications or access sensitive data.

  • Git Repositories (GitHub, GitLab, etc.):

    • Security Implication: Code repositories contain the source code of deployed applications. Compromise could lead to code tampering, injection of malicious code, and supply chain attacks.
    • Specific Threats:
      • Compromised Repository Access: Attackers gaining access to user's Git repositories could modify application code before deployment.
      • Leaked Credentials in Code: Accidental commit of secrets (API keys, passwords) into repositories.
      • Malicious Commits: Insiders or compromised accounts could introduce malicious code into the repository.

  • Container Registries (Docker Hub, etc.):

    • Security Implication: Container registries store the images used for deployments. Compromised images can lead to deployment of vulnerable or malicious applications.
    • Specific Threats:
      • Compromised Registry Access: Attackers gaining access to registries could replace legitimate images with malicious ones.
      • Vulnerable Base Images: Using base images with known vulnerabilities can propagate those vulnerabilities to deployed applications.
      • Image Tampering: Man-in-the-middle attacks during image pull could lead to deployment of altered images.

  • Database Servers (PostgreSQL, MySQL, etc.):

    • Security Implication: Databases store application data and platform configuration. Compromise can lead to data breaches, data loss, and service disruption.
    • Specific Threats:
      • SQL Injection: Vulnerabilities in applications interacting with databases could allow attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands.
      • Database Credential Compromise: Leaked or weak database credentials could allow unauthorized access.
      • Database Misconfiguration: Default or insecure database configurations can expose vulnerabilities.
      • Data Breaches: Unauthorized access to databases can lead to exfiltration of sensitive application data.

  • SMTP Servers:

    • Security Implication: SMTP servers are used for sending emails, including password resets and notifications. Compromise can lead to email spoofing, phishing, and information disclosure.
    • Specific Threats:
      • Email Spoofing: Attackers could send emails appearing to be from Coolify to trick users.
      • Open Relay Vulnerabilities: Misconfigured SMTP servers could be used for spam or malicious email campaigns.
      • Information Disclosure in Emails: Sensitive information could be inadvertently disclosed in emails sent by the platform.

  • DNS Providers:

    • Security Implication: DNS providers manage domain names and routing. Compromise can lead to redirection of traffic to malicious sites, denial of service, and domain hijacking.
    • Specific Threats:
      • DNS Hijacking: Attackers gaining control of DNS records could redirect traffic intended for Coolify or deployed applications to malicious servers.
      • DNS Spoofing: Attackers could manipulate DNS responses to redirect traffic.
      • DDoS Attacks on DNS Infrastructure: Attacks targeting DNS providers can cause widespread service disruption.

2.2. C4 Container Diagram Components

  • Nginx:

    • Security Implication: Nginx is the entry point for web traffic. Vulnerabilities can lead to web server compromise, denial of service, and bypassing security controls.
    • Specific Threats:
      • Nginx Configuration Errors: Misconfigurations can expose vulnerabilities or weaken security.
      • Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in Nginx itself could be exploited.
      • DDoS Attacks: Nginx could be targeted by DDoS attacks to disrupt service availability.
      • Bypassing WAF (if implemented): Attackers might find ways to bypass Web Application Firewall rules.

  • Coolify API:

    • Security Implication: The API handles core platform logic and data. Vulnerabilities can lead to full platform compromise, data breaches, and unauthorized actions.
    • Specific Threats:
      • API Endpoint Vulnerabilities: Unprotected or vulnerable API endpoints could be exploited for unauthorized access or data manipulation.
      • Injection Attacks (SQL, Command, NoSQL): Vulnerabilities in API code could allow injection attacks.
      • Authentication and Authorization Flaws: Weaknesses in API authentication or authorization mechanisms.
      • Business Logic Flaws: Flaws in the API's business logic could be exploited for unintended actions or privilege escalation.
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Vulnerable Node.js packages or other dependencies.

  • Job Queue (Redis):

    • Security Implication: Redis manages background tasks. Compromise can lead to manipulation of deployment processes, denial of service, and potential data leakage if sensitive data is queued.
    • Specific Threats:
      • Unauthenticated Access to Redis: If Redis is not properly secured, attackers could gain unauthorized access.
      • Command Injection in Jobs: Malicious jobs could be injected into the queue to execute arbitrary commands.
      • Denial of Service: Flooding Redis with jobs or exploiting Redis vulnerabilities could lead to denial of service.
      • Data Leakage from Job Payloads: Sensitive data in job payloads could be exposed if Redis is compromised.

  • Worker Processes:

    • Security Implication: Workers execute deployment tasks and interact with infrastructure. Compromise can lead to infrastructure takeover, deployment of malicious applications, and data breaches.
    • Specific Threats:
      • Code Execution Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in worker process code could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code.
      • Privilege Escalation: Workers might have excessive privileges, which could be exploited if compromised.
      • Insecure Interactions with Infrastructure Providers: Weaknesses in how workers interact with Docker, Kubernetes, or cloud provider APIs.
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Vulnerable dependencies in worker process code.

  • Database (PostgreSQL):

    • Security Implication: PostgreSQL stores persistent platform data. Compromise can lead to data breaches, data loss, and platform unavailability.
    • Specific Threats:
      • SQL Injection (indirect via API): While direct access might be restricted, vulnerabilities in the API could lead to SQL injection.
      • Database Credential Compromise: Leaked or weak database credentials.
      • Database Misconfiguration: Insecure PostgreSQL configuration.
      • Data Breaches: Unauthorized access to the database leading to data exfiltration.
      • Denial of Service: Database overload or exploitation of database vulnerabilities.

2.3. Deployment Architecture (Docker Compose - Single Server) Components

  • Docker Host OS:

    • Security Implication: The host OS is the foundation for all containers. Compromise can lead to full server takeover and compromise of all Coolify components and managed applications.
    • Specific Threats:
      • OS Vulnerabilities: Unpatched OS vulnerabilities.
      • Weak OS Configuration: Default or insecure OS configurations.
      • Insufficient Access Controls: Overly permissive access controls on the host OS.
      • Container Escape: Vulnerabilities in Docker or container runtime could allow container escape and host OS access.

  • Nginx, Coolify API, Redis, Worker, PostgreSQL Containers:

    • Security Implication: Container vulnerabilities can lead to compromise of individual services and potentially the host OS.
    • Specific Threats:
      • Vulnerable Container Images: Using base images or dependencies with known vulnerabilities.
      • Container Misconfiguration: Running containers with unnecessary privileges or exposed ports.
      • Resource Exhaustion: Containers consuming excessive resources leading to denial of service.
      • Container Image Tampering (if not properly verified): Using untrusted or tampered container images.

2.4. Build Process Components

  • CI/CD Pipeline (GitHub Actions):

    • Security Implication: Compromised CI/CD pipelines can lead to injection of malicious code into builds and deployments, supply chain attacks, and credential leakage.
    • Specific Threats:
      • Compromised Pipeline Configuration: Attackers modifying pipeline configurations to inject malicious steps.
      • Credential Leakage in Pipeline: Secrets (API keys, passwords) exposed in pipeline logs or configurations.
      • Dependency Confusion Attacks: Introducing malicious dependencies during the build process.
      • Supply Chain Attacks via Dependencies: Using vulnerable or compromised dependencies.

  • Security Checks (SAST, Linters):

    • Security Implication: Ineffective or bypassed security checks can fail to detect vulnerabilities before deployment.
    • Specific Threats:
      • Insufficient SAST Coverage: SAST tools not configured to detect all relevant vulnerability types.
      • False Negatives in SAST: SAST tools missing actual vulnerabilities.
      • Bypassing Security Checks: Developers disabling or ignoring security check results.
      • Outdated Security Check Tools: Using outdated versions of SAST tools or linters.

  • Container Image Registry (Docker Hub):

    • Security Implication: As mentioned before, compromised registries can lead to deployment of malicious images.
    • Specific Threats:
      • Unsecured Registry Access: Publicly accessible or weakly secured registry.
      • Lack of Image Scanning: Not scanning images for vulnerabilities before publishing.
      • Image Tampering: Attackers modifying images in the registry.
      • Supply Chain Attacks via Base Images: Using base images from compromised or untrusted registries.

3. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

Based on the identified threats, here are actionable and tailored mitigation strategies for Coolify:

General Platform Security:

  1. Implement Comprehensive Input Validation and Sanitization (Security Requirement - Input Validation):

    • Action: Thoroughly validate and sanitize all user inputs across the Coolify API, web UI, and worker processes. Use established libraries for input validation and output encoding to prevent injection attacks (SQL, XSS, Command Injection, etc.).
    • Tailored to Coolify: Focus validation on inputs related to application names, domain names, environment variables, database credentials, and deployment configurations, as these are critical areas for potential injection vulnerabilities in a deployment platform.

  2. Strengthen Authentication and Authorization (Security Requirement - Authentication & Authorization):

    • Action:
      • Enforce strong password policies (complexity, length, rotation).
      • Implement and mandate Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for all users, especially administrators.
      • Review and refine Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to ensure granular permissions and the principle of least privilege.
      • Implement robust session management with secure cookies (HttpOnly, Secure flags) and session timeouts.
    • Tailored to Coolify: Consider integrating with OAuth providers for user authentication to simplify user management and enhance security. Clearly define roles for users (e.g., platform admin, developer, viewer) with specific permissions related to managing infrastructure, deployments, and configurations.

  3. Enhance Secrets Management (Recommended Security Control):

    • Action:
      • Implement a dedicated secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, Kubernetes Secrets, cloud provider secret managers) to securely store and manage all sensitive credentials (API keys, database passwords, TLS certificates, etc.).
      • Never hardcode secrets in code or configuration files.
      • Encrypt secrets at rest and in transit.
      • Rotate secrets regularly.
      • Limit access to secrets to only authorized components and processes.
    • Tailored to Coolify: Focus on securing credentials used for accessing infrastructure providers (Docker, Kubernetes, cloud platforms), database servers, SMTP servers, and container registries. Ensure that worker processes and the API server retrieve secrets securely from the secrets management solution during deployment and runtime.

  4. Implement Automated Security Scanning (SAST/DAST) in CI/CD Pipeline (Recommended Security Control):

    • Action:
      • Integrate Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically scan code for vulnerabilities during development.
      • Integrate Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) tools to scan the running Coolify platform for vulnerabilities in a staging environment.
      • Configure SAST/DAST tools to cover a wide range of vulnerability types relevant to Node.js, web applications, and containerized environments.
      • Establish a process for reviewing and remediating findings from security scans.
    • Tailored to Coolify: Focus SAST on the Coolify API and worker process codebases. DAST should target the exposed API endpoints and web UI. Regularly update SAST/DAST tools and vulnerability databases.

  5. Conduct Regular Penetration Testing (Recommended Security Control):

    • Action:
      • Engage external security professionals to conduct regular penetration testing of the Coolify platform (at least annually, and after major releases).
      • Scope penetration tests to cover all key components, functionalities, and deployment architectures.
      • Address and remediate all identified vulnerabilities from penetration testing reports.
    • Tailored to Coolify: Penetration testing should specifically focus on the self-hosted deployment model, considering potential vulnerabilities arising from user-provided infrastructure and configurations.

  6. Implement Rate Limiting and DDoS Protection (Recommended Security Control):

    • Action:
      • Implement rate limiting on API endpoints and the web UI to prevent brute-force attacks and abuse.
      • Consider using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or DDoS protection service (e.g., Cloudflare, AWS Shield) to protect the Nginx web server and the platform from denial-of-service attacks.
    • Tailored to Coolify: Rate limiting should be configured to protect against excessive API requests, login attempts, and resource-intensive operations. WAF rules should be tailored to common web application attacks and Coolify-specific vulnerabilities.

  7. Provide Security Hardening Guidelines for Users (Recommended Security Control):

    • Action:
      • Create comprehensive security hardening guidelines and best practices documentation for users deploying Coolify on their infrastructure.
      • Include recommendations for OS hardening, Docker security, database security, network security, and container security.
      • Provide example configurations and scripts to assist users in implementing security best practices.
    • Tailored to Coolify: Guidelines should be specific to the supported deployment environments (Docker Compose, Swarm, Kubernetes) and operating systems. Emphasize the importance of regular patching, firewall configuration, and secure container image management.

  8. Enhance Logging and Monitoring:

    • Action:
      • Implement comprehensive logging of security-relevant events (authentication attempts, authorization failures, API requests, deployment activities, errors, etc.) across all components (Nginx, API, Workers, PostgreSQL, Redis).
      • Set up centralized logging and monitoring infrastructure (e.g., ELK stack, Grafana Loki) to aggregate and analyze logs.
      • Implement alerting for suspicious activities and security incidents.
    • Tailored to Coolify: Focus logging on events related to user authentication, authorization, API access, deployment operations, and infrastructure interactions. Monitor for unusual patterns, error spikes, and security-related events.

  9. Secure Container Images and Build Process (BUILD Security):

    • Action:
      • Use minimal base images for Docker containers to reduce the attack surface.
      • Regularly scan container images for vulnerabilities using image scanning tools (e.g., Trivy, Clair) in the CI/CD pipeline and during runtime.
      • Implement image signing and verification to ensure image integrity and prevent tampering.
      • Harden the CI/CD pipeline by following secure pipeline configuration best practices and limiting access to pipeline secrets.
      • Implement dependency scanning and vulnerability checks in the build process to identify and address vulnerable dependencies.
    • Tailored to Coolify: Ensure that base images for Nginx, Coolify API, Worker, Redis, and PostgreSQL containers are regularly updated and scanned. Integrate image scanning into the CI/CD pipeline to prevent vulnerable images from being deployed.

  10. Database Security (DATABASE Security):

    • Action:
      • Enforce strong database authentication and access control.
      • Configure PostgreSQL with secure settings, disabling unnecessary features and hardening configurations.
      • Encrypt database data at rest and in transit (if feasible and performance-permitting).
      • Regularly backup the database and implement disaster recovery procedures.
      • Limit database access to only authorized components (Coolify API, Worker processes).
    • Tailored to Coolify: Ensure that database credentials are securely managed using the secrets management solution. Provide guidance to users on securing their managed databases as well.

Specific Component Mitigations:

  • Nginx:

    • Regularly update Nginx to the latest stable version.
    • Harden Nginx configuration based on security best practices (disable unnecessary modules, limit request size, configure timeouts, etc.).
    • Implement TLS/SSL with strong ciphers and protocols (Security Requirement - Cryptography).
    • Consider integrating a Web Application Firewall (WAF) for advanced protection.

  • Coolify API (Node.js):

    • Regularly update Node.js and all dependencies to the latest versions.
    • Follow secure coding practices for Node.js applications to prevent common vulnerabilities (OWASP Node.js Security Cheat Sheet).
    • Implement robust error handling and logging to prevent information disclosure and aid in debugging security issues.
    • Use a framework that provides built-in security features (e.g., Express with security middleware).

  • Redis:

    • Enable authentication for Redis and use a strong password.
    • Limit network access to Redis to only authorized components (Coolify API, Worker processes).
    • Consider enabling TLS encryption for Redis communication (if sensitive data is transmitted).
    • Regularly update Redis to the latest stable version.

  • Worker Processes:

    • Apply the principle of least privilege to worker processes, granting them only the necessary permissions to perform their tasks.
    • Isolate worker processes as much as possible to limit the impact of a potential compromise.
    • Implement robust input validation for job parameters to prevent command injection or other vulnerabilities.

Addressing Accepted Risks:

  • Public Vulnerability Disclosure:

    • Mitigation: Implement a responsible vulnerability disclosure policy and process. Encourage security researchers to report vulnerabilities responsibly. Prioritize patching and releasing security updates quickly. Communicate security updates clearly to users.

  • Reliance on User-Provided Infrastructure:

    • Mitigation: Provide comprehensive security hardening guidelines and best practices for users (as mentioned above). Offer pre-configured deployment options with reasonable security defaults. Consider developing automated security checks that users can run on their Coolify deployments to identify misconfigurations.

By implementing these tailored mitigation strategies, Coolify can significantly enhance its security posture, build user trust, and mitigate the identified risks associated with its self-hosted deployment platform. Continuous security monitoring, regular updates, and ongoing security assessments are crucial for maintaining a strong security posture over time.