Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
186 lines (137 loc) · 16.7 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

186 lines (137 loc) · 16.7 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of Coolify based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of Coolify's key components, identifying potential vulnerabilities, assessing their impact, and recommending mitigation strategies. The analysis will focus on the core Coolify application, its interaction with external systems, and the deployment environment, aiming to improve the overall security posture of self-hosted Coolify instances and the applications they manage.

  • Scope:

    • Coolify's core components (Web UI, API Server, Worker/Scheduler, Coolify Database, Reverse Proxy).
    • Interactions between Coolify and external systems (Application Servers, Database Servers, Git repositories, Docker Engine/Registry).
    • The single-server deployment model, as described in the design review.
    • The build process, including CI/CD pipeline and image creation.
    • Data flow and storage within the Coolify system.

  • Methodology:

    1. Component Analysis: Examine each key component (Web UI, API, Worker, Database, Reverse Proxy) individually, identifying potential security concerns based on its function and interactions.
    2. Data Flow Analysis: Trace the flow of sensitive data (credentials, configuration, user data) through the system to identify potential exposure points.
    3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the business and security posture, considering attacker motivations and capabilities. We'll use a simplified STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) model.
    4. Vulnerability Assessment: Based on the component analysis, data flow analysis, and threat modeling, identify specific vulnerabilities that could be exploited.
    5. Mitigation Recommendations: Propose actionable and specific mitigation strategies to address the identified vulnerabilities. These recommendations will be tailored to Coolify's architecture and deployment model.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each component, considering potential threats and vulnerabilities:

  • Web UI:

    • Function: User interface for managing Coolify.
    • Threats:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If user inputs are not properly sanitized and encoded, an attacker could inject malicious scripts into the UI, potentially stealing session tokens or performing actions on behalf of other users.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): An attacker could trick a user into performing unintended actions on the Coolify UI if proper CSRF protection is not in place.
      • Authentication Bypass: Weak authentication mechanisms or vulnerabilities in session management could allow attackers to bypass authentication and gain access to the UI.
      • Information Disclosure: Error messages or debug information displayed in the UI could reveal sensitive information about the system.
    • Vulnerabilities: Insufficient input validation, lack of output encoding, weak session management, insecure direct object references (IDOR).

  • API Server:

    • Function: Handles requests from the UI and other clients, interacts with the database, and schedules tasks.
    • Threats:
      • Injection Attacks (SQL, Command, etc.): If user inputs are not properly validated, an attacker could inject malicious code into database queries or system commands.
      • Authentication Bypass: Similar to the Web UI, weak authentication or session management could allow unauthorized access to the API.
      • Authorization Bypass: Insufficient authorization checks could allow users to access resources or perform actions they should not be allowed to.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): The API could be overwhelmed with requests, making it unavailable to legitimate users. Lack of rate limiting is a key vulnerability here.
      • Information Disclosure: API responses could reveal sensitive information about the system or other users.
    • Vulnerabilities: Insufficient input validation, lack of rate limiting, insecure deserialization, improper error handling, weak authentication/authorization.

  • Worker/Scheduler:

    • Function: Executes asynchronous tasks, such as deployments and database provisioning.
    • Threats:
      • Command Injection: If task parameters are not properly validated, an attacker could inject malicious commands that are executed by the worker.
      • Privilege Escalation: If the worker runs with excessive privileges, a vulnerability in the worker could allow an attacker to gain control of the entire server.
      • Denial of Service: Malicious or poorly designed tasks could consume excessive resources, impacting the performance of the system.
    • Vulnerabilities: Insufficient input validation, excessive privileges, insecure handling of secrets (e.g., hardcoded credentials).

  • Coolify Database:

    • Function: Stores Coolify's internal data.
    • Threats:
      • SQL Injection: If database queries are not properly parameterized, an attacker could inject malicious SQL code to access, modify, or delete data.
      • Unauthorized Access: Weak database credentials or misconfigured access controls could allow unauthorized users to access the database.
      • Data Breach: If the database is compromised, sensitive data (e.g., user accounts, API keys) could be stolen.
    • Vulnerabilities: SQL injection vulnerabilities, weak database credentials, lack of encryption at rest, insufficient auditing.

  • Reverse Proxy (Traefik):

    • Function: Handles incoming requests, provides SSL termination, and routes traffic.
    • Threats:
      • Misconfiguration: Incorrectly configured Traefik rules could expose internal services or allow unauthorized access.
      • Denial of Service: Traefik itself could be targeted by DoS attacks.
      • Vulnerabilities in Traefik: Unpatched vulnerabilities in Traefik could be exploited by attackers.
    • Vulnerabilities: Outdated Traefik version, weak TLS configuration, exposed management interface, improper routing rules.

  • Application Server (User Application Container):

    • Function: Runs the user's application code.
    • Threats: This is largely the user's responsibility, but Coolify's configuration can impact it. Threats include all standard web application vulnerabilities (XSS, SQLi, etc.). Coolify's role is to ensure proper isolation and resource limits.
    • Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the user's application code, insecure container configuration (e.g., running as root), exposed ports.

  • Database Server (User Application Database):

    • Function: Stores the user's application data.
    • Threats: Similar to the Coolify Database, but also includes threats specific to the database technology used (e.g., NoSQL injection). Coolify's role is to provision it securely and provide connection details.
    • Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the database software, weak credentials, lack of encryption, insufficient access controls.

3. Inferred Architecture, Components, and Data Flow

Based on the design review and the GitHub repository (although I don't have direct access, I'm using my knowledge of similar projects), I can infer the following:

  • Architecture: Microservices-like architecture, with separate containers for the UI, API, worker, and database. Communication between services likely happens over HTTP/HTTPS (internal network).
  • Components: As described in the C4 diagrams. Key technologies likely include:
    • Frontend: Likely a JavaScript framework (React, Vue.js, or Svelte).
    • Backend: Likely Node.js, Python (FastAPI/Flask), or Go.
    • Database: PostgreSQL is a common choice for this type of application.
    • Worker: Could be implemented using a task queue library (e.g., Celery, BullMQ) or a custom solution.
    • Reverse Proxy: Traefik.
    • Containerization: Docker.
  • Data Flow:
    1. User interacts with the Web UI.
    2. UI sends requests to the API Server (over HTTPS, proxied by Traefik).
    3. API Server authenticates and authorizes the request.
    4. API Server interacts with the Coolify Database to retrieve or update data (e.g., application configurations).
    5. API Server schedules tasks for the Worker (e.g., deployment requests).
    6. Worker executes tasks, interacting with external systems (Docker Engine, Git repositories, database servers).
    7. Worker updates the Coolify Database with the status of tasks.
    8. API Server returns responses to the UI.
    9. User applications (running in separate containers) interact with their own databases.

4. Specific Security Considerations for Coolify

Here are specific security considerations tailored to Coolify, building upon the general threats and vulnerabilities outlined above:

  • Secret Management: Coolify handles sensitive data like API keys, database credentials, and SSH keys. These secrets must not be hardcoded in the codebase or configuration files. A dedicated secret management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, environment variables, Docker secrets) is crucial. The design review mentions SSH key management, but the implementation details need careful scrutiny.

  • Dependency Management: Coolify relies on numerous third-party dependencies. Regularly scanning for vulnerabilities in these dependencies (using SCA tools) and applying updates promptly is essential. The "accepted risk" of relying on third-party dependencies needs to be actively mitigated.

  • Docker Security: While Docker provides isolation, it's not a silver bullet. Several best practices must be followed:

    • Run containers as non-root users: Avoid running containers with root privileges to limit the impact of potential vulnerabilities.
    • Use minimal base images: Smaller base images reduce the attack surface.
    • Scan images for vulnerabilities: Integrate image scanning into the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Limit container resources: Use Docker's resource limits (CPU, memory) to prevent DoS attacks.
    • Secure Docker daemon: Protect the Docker daemon itself from unauthorized access.

  • Network Segmentation: Even in a single-server deployment, network segmentation can improve security. Use Docker networks to isolate containers from each other and from the host network. Only expose necessary ports.

  • Traefik Configuration: Traefik's configuration must be carefully reviewed to ensure:

    • Strong TLS configuration: Use modern TLS protocols and ciphers.
    • Proper routing rules: Prevent access to internal services that should not be exposed.
    • Rate limiting: Protect against DoS attacks.
    • Consider enabling basic authentication for the Traefik dashboard itself.

  • Database Security:

    • Use strong, randomly generated passwords for all databases.
    • Enable encryption at rest and in transit for sensitive data.
    • Implement regular backups and test the restoration process.
    • Configure database users with the least privilege necessary.
    • Monitor database logs for suspicious activity.

  • Git Repository Security:

    • Use SSH keys or personal access tokens (PATs) for authentication with Git repositories.
    • Enable branch protection rules to prevent unauthorized code changes.
    • Require code reviews before merging changes.

  • User Input Validation: Thorough input validation is critical throughout the Coolify application (UI, API, worker). Validate all user inputs against expected formats and lengths. Use parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection. Sanitize inputs to prevent XSS.

  • Authentication and Authorization:

    • Implement strong password policies.
    • Offer (and strongly encourage) two-factor authentication (2FA).
    • Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to limit user permissions.
    • Use secure session management techniques (e.g., HTTP-only cookies, secure cookies, short session timeouts).

  • Audit Logging: Log all critical actions within Coolify (e.g., user logins, deployments, configuration changes). These logs should be stored securely and monitored for suspicious activity.

  • Error Handling: Avoid revealing sensitive information in error messages. Use generic error messages for users and log detailed error information for debugging purposes.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

Here are specific, actionable mitigation strategies for Coolify, addressing the identified threats and vulnerabilities:

  1. Implement a robust secret management solution: Integrate HashiCorp Vault (or a similar solution) to securely store and manage all secrets. Alternatively, use environment variables (for less sensitive secrets) and Docker secrets, ensuring they are not exposed in the codebase or configuration files. This is the highest priority item.

  2. Integrate SAST and SCA into the CI/CD pipeline: Use tools like SonarQube (SAST) and Snyk or Dependabot (SCA) to automatically scan the codebase and dependencies for vulnerabilities. Configure the pipeline to fail builds if high-severity vulnerabilities are found.

  3. Enforce non-root user for Docker containers: Modify Dockerfiles to create and use non-root users within containers. This significantly reduces the impact of container escapes.

  4. Implement RBAC: Define clear roles (e.g., administrator, user, viewer) and assign permissions to each role. Ensure that users can only access resources and perform actions that are necessary for their role.

  5. Add 2FA support: Integrate a 2FA library (e.g., a TOTP library) to provide an additional layer of security for user authentication.

  6. Implement rate limiting on the API: Use a library or middleware to limit the number of requests a user can make to the API within a given time period. This protects against DoS attacks and brute-force attempts.

  7. Thoroughly validate and sanitize all user inputs: Implement strict input validation on both the frontend (UI) and backend (API). Use a combination of whitelisting (allowing only known good characters) and blacklisting (rejecting known bad characters). Use parameterized queries for all database interactions. Use a dedicated library for output encoding to prevent XSS.

  8. Review and harden Traefik configuration: Ensure that Traefik is configured with a strong TLS configuration, proper routing rules, and rate limiting. Enable HTTPS redirection. Restrict access to the Traefik dashboard.

  9. Implement database security best practices: Use strong, randomly generated passwords. Enable encryption at rest (if supported by the database technology). Configure database users with least privilege. Enable database auditing.

  10. Implement audit logging: Use a logging library to record all critical actions within Coolify. Store logs securely and monitor them for suspicious activity.

  11. Provide security documentation and guidelines: Create clear and comprehensive documentation that explains how to securely deploy and use Coolify. Include best practices for securing user applications and databases.

  12. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program: Create a process for security researchers to responsibly report vulnerabilities in Coolify.

  13. Regularly update all dependencies: Keep Coolify and its dependencies up to date to patch security vulnerabilities.

  14. Secure the Docker daemon: Follow best practices for securing the Docker daemon, such as enabling TLS authentication and restricting access to the daemon's API.

  15. Use Docker networks for segmentation: Create separate Docker networks for different components (e.g., frontend, backend, database) to limit the impact of potential breaches.

  16. Implement secure session management: Use HTTP-only and secure cookies. Set appropriate session timeouts. Invalidate sessions on logout.

  17. Implement robust error handling: Avoid revealing sensitive information in error messages shown to users. Log detailed error information separately for debugging.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for Coolify. By implementing these mitigation strategies, the Coolify development team can significantly improve the security posture of the platform and protect users from potential threats. The most critical areas to address immediately are secret management, dependency scanning, and Docker security best practices.