Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
129 lines (114 loc) · 17 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

129 lines (114 loc) · 17 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for dingo/api

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization for API Endpoints

  • Description:
    1. Define Input Schemas: For each API endpoint, explicitly define the expected input data structure, data types, and formats. Utilize validation libraries or dingo/api's built-in validation features if available to create these schemas.
    2. Implement Validation Logic within API Handlers/Middleware: Within each API endpoint handler or using dingo/api middleware, implement validation logic that checks incoming requests against the defined schemas. Reject requests that do not conform to the schema directly at the API level.
    3. Sanitize Input Data within API Handlers/Middleware: After validation, sanitize input data within dingo/api handlers or middleware to remove or encode potentially harmful characters or code before further processing within the API logic. This is crucial at the API entry point.
    4. Use Parameterized Queries/Prepared Statements in API Data Access Logic: When API logic interacts with databases, ensure parameterized queries or prepared statements are used to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities originating from API input.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • SQL Injection (Severity: High) - Malicious SQL code injected through API inputs can compromise the database.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (Severity: Medium) - Malicious scripts injected through API inputs can be executed in users' browsers.
    • Command Injection (Severity: High) - Malicious commands injected through API inputs can be executed on the server.
    • Data Integrity Issues (Severity: Medium) - Invalid or malformed data processed by the API can lead to application errors and data corruption.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: Medium) - Maliciously crafted inputs sent to the API can cause excessive resource consumption and API crashes.
  • Impact:
    • SQL Injection: Significantly reduces risk.
    • XSS: Moderately reduces risk (primarily server-side XSS mitigation at the API level).
    • Command Injection: Significantly reduces risk.
    • Data Integrity Issues: Significantly reduces risk.
    • DoS: Moderately reduces risk (helps prevent input-based DoS at the API entry point).
  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Input validation is implemented for some API endpoints in the Product and Order controllers using basic type checking within the API handlers.
  • Missing Implementation: Missing detailed schema definitions for all API endpoints, comprehensive sanitization logic within API handlers or middleware, and consistent use of parameterized queries in API data access logic across all API interactions. Validation is not consistently applied to all input parameters at the API level.

Mitigation Strategy: Robust API Authentication and Authorization

  • Description:
    1. Choose a Secure API Authentication Method: Implement a strong authentication mechanism suitable for API access, such as OAuth 2.0, JWT (JSON Web Tokens), or API Keys (if appropriate). Configure this within the dingo/api application.
    2. Implement Authentication Middleware in dingo/api: Use dingo/api's middleware capabilities to enforce authentication for all protected API endpoints. This middleware, within the API framework, should verify provided credentials (e.g., JWT, API Key) and ensure they are valid for API access.
    3. Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) within API Logic: Define roles and permissions relevant to API access. Implement authorization logic within dingo/api handlers or middleware that checks if the authenticated user or application has the necessary permissions to access specific API endpoints or perform certain actions. This is authorization at the API level.
    4. Secure API Key Management within the Application: If using API keys, ensure secure generation, storage, and transmission of API keys within the context of your dingo/api application. Manage API keys securely within the application's configuration and logic.
    5. Regularly Rotate API Keys and Tokens (API Level): Implement a mechanism for regularly rotating API keys and tokens used for API authentication to limit the window of opportunity if API credentials are compromised.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized API Access (Severity: High) - Attackers gaining access to sensitive API data or functionality without proper authorization.
    • API Data Breaches (Severity: High) - Compromised API credentials leading to unauthorized API access and data exfiltration through the API.
    • API Privilege Escalation (Severity: High) - Attackers gaining higher API privileges than intended.
    • API Session Hijacking (Severity: Medium) - Attackers stealing or hijacking API sessions to gain unauthorized API access.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized API Access: Significantly reduces risk.
    • API Data Breaches: Significantly reduces risk.
    • API Privilege Escalation: Significantly reduces risk.
    • API Session Hijacking: Moderately reduces risk (depends on the specific API authentication method and session management within the API).
  • Currently Implemented: Partial - JWT authentication is implemented for user-facing API endpoints, but API key authentication is used for external integrations without proper key rotation at the API level. Basic role-based access control is in place for user roles accessing the API but not for API client permissions.
  • Missing Implementation: Missing comprehensive RBAC for API clients, API key rotation mechanism, and consistent authorization checks across all API endpoints. Need to review and strengthen API credential storage practices within the application.

Mitigation Strategy: API Rate Limiting and Abuse Prevention

  • Description:
    1. Identify API Rate Limiting Thresholds: Determine appropriate rate limits for each API endpoint based on expected API usage patterns and API resource capacity. Consider different limits for authenticated and unauthenticated API users.
    2. Implement Rate Limiting Middleware in dingo/api: Utilize or develop rate limiting middleware within dingo/api itself. This middleware, operating within the API framework, should track the number of requests from each IP address or authenticated API user within a defined time window.
    3. Implement Throttling and Blocking at the API Level: When API rate limits are exceeded, implement throttling (gradually slowing down API requests) or blocking (temporarily rejecting API requests) within the dingo/api application to prevent API abuse.
    4. Monitor API Usage and Adjust Limits (API Focused): Continuously monitor API usage patterns and adjust API rate limits as needed to optimize API performance and security. This monitoring should be focused on API traffic and usage.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • API Denial of Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) (Severity: High) - Attackers overwhelming the API with excessive requests, making it unavailable to legitimate API users.
    • API Brute-Force Attacks (Severity: Medium) - Attackers attempting to guess API credentials or API keys through repeated API requests.
    • API Abuse and Resource Exhaustion (Severity: Medium) - Malicious or unintentional overuse of API resources leading to API performance degradation or service disruption.
  • Impact:
    • API DoS/DDoS: Significantly reduces risk.
    • API Brute-Force Attacks: Moderately reduces risk.
    • API Abuse and Resource Exhaustion: Significantly reduces risk.
  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic IP-based rate limiting is implemented at the API gateway level for public API endpoints, but not within the dingo/api application itself.
  • Missing Implementation: Missing granular API rate limiting within dingo/api based on user roles or API clients. No API rate limiting for authenticated API endpoints within the application. No dynamic adjustment of API rate limits based on API usage patterns within the application logic.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Error Handling and Information Disclosure Prevention in API Responses

  • Description:
    1. Implement Custom API Error Handlers in dingo/api: Customize error handling within dingo/api to prevent the framework from exposing sensitive information in API error responses. This customization should be within the API framework itself.
    2. Generic API Error Responses for Clients: Return generic API error messages to API clients, such as "Internal Server Error" or "Bad Request," without revealing specific details about the API error.
    3. Detailed API Error Logging on Server-Side: Log detailed API error information, including stack traces and debugging data, securely on the server-side for debugging and monitoring API issues. Ensure these API logs are not accessible to unauthorized API users.
    4. Avoid Verbose API Error Messages in Production: While more verbose API errors can be helpful during API development and testing, ensure these are not exposed in production API environments.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • API Information Disclosure (Severity: Medium) - Exposure of sensitive API information through detailed API error messages, stack traces, or debugging information in API responses.
    • API Reconnaissance and Attack Surface Mapping (Severity: Medium) - Detailed API error messages providing attackers with insights into the API's internal workings and potential API vulnerabilities.
  • Impact:
    • API Information Disclosure: Moderately reduces risk.
    • API Reconnaissance and Attack Surface Mapping: Moderately reduces risk.
  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Generic API error responses are used for some common API error codes, but detailed API error messages are still exposed in certain scenarios, especially for unhandled exceptions within the API.
  • Missing Implementation: Need to implement comprehensive custom API error handlers for all API endpoints and ensure consistent generic API error responses are returned to clients while detailed API errors are logged securely server-side.

Mitigation Strategy: API Versioning and Deprecation Strategy within dingo/api

  • Description:
    1. Implement API Versioning in dingo/api: Use dingo/api's versioning features or implement a versioning scheme (e.g., using URL paths or headers) within the API framework to manage different versions of the API.
    2. Document API Versions (API Specific): Clearly document all available API versions and their respective features and deprecation status for API consumers.
    3. Establish an API Deprecation Policy: Define a clear policy for deprecating older API versions, including a timeline for API deprecation and communication plan for API consumers.
    4. Graceful API Deprecation Process: When deprecating an API version, provide a reasonable transition period and communicate the API deprecation plan to API consumers well in advance.
    5. Retire Deprecated API Versions: After the API deprecation period, properly retire deprecated API versions and ensure they are no longer accessible to prevent reliance on potentially vulnerable older API versions.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Security Vulnerabilities in Older API Versions (Severity: Medium) - Continued use of older, potentially vulnerable API versions by clients.
    • API Breaking Changes and Service Disruption (Severity: Medium) - Introducing breaking API changes without proper versioning, leading to client application failures and API service disruption.
  • Impact:
    • Security Vulnerabilities in Older API Versions: Moderately reduces risk.
    • API Breaking Changes and Service Disruption: Moderately reduces risk (indirectly improves API security by promoting stability and controlled API updates).
  • Currently Implemented: No - API versioning is not currently implemented. All API changes are deployed to a single, non-versioned API.
  • Missing Implementation: Need to implement API versioning for all API endpoints and establish a clear API deprecation policy and process within the dingo/api application.

Mitigation Strategy: Serialization/Deserialization Security Considerations within dingo/api

  • Description:
    1. Use Secure Serialization Libraries in dingo/api: Ensure that dingo/api and your application use secure and well-maintained serialization libraries (e.g., for JSON, XML) for API request and response handling.
    2. Configure Serialization Libraries Securely (API Context): Configure serialization libraries used by dingo/api with security best practices in mind. For example, disable features that could lead to vulnerabilities, such as polymorphic deserialization if not strictly needed and carefully controlled in the API context.
    3. Validate Deserialized API Data: After deserializing data from API requests, perform thorough validation within the API logic to ensure the data conforms to expected types and formats before processing it further in the API.
    4. Limit API Payload Sizes: Implement limits on the size of API request payloads to prevent denial-of-service attacks through excessively large payloads sent to the API.
    5. Regularly Review API Serialization Configurations: Periodically review API serialization configurations and update libraries to address any newly discovered vulnerabilities relevant to API data handling.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • API Deserialization Vulnerabilities (Severity: High) - Exploitation of vulnerabilities in API deserialization processes to execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service through the API.
    • API Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: Medium) - Sending maliciously crafted payloads to the API that consume excessive resources during API deserialization.
  • Impact:
    • API Deserialization Vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces risk.
    • API DoS: Moderately reduces risk.
  • Currently Implemented: Default - Using default serialization libraries provided by dingo/api for API data handling without specific security configurations. API payload size limits are not explicitly enforced.
  • Missing Implementation: Need to review and potentially reconfigure API serialization libraries for security, implement API payload size limits, and ensure consistent validation of deserialized API data within the application.

Mitigation Strategy: CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) Configuration for Browser-Based API Access

  • Description:
    1. Define Allowed Origins in dingo/api CORS Configuration: Carefully define the list of allowed origins in your dingo/api CORS configuration. Only include trusted domains that are authorized to access your API from web browsers. Configure this within the API framework.
    2. Restrict Allowed Methods and Headers in API CORS: Configure API CORS to restrict allowed HTTP methods (e.g., GET, POST) and headers to only those necessary for legitimate cross-origin API requests.
    3. Avoid Wildcard Origins in Production API CORS: Avoid using wildcard (*) for allowed origins in production API environments, as this allows any website to access your API, potentially leading to API security risks.
    4. Test API CORS Configuration: Thoroughly test your API CORS configuration to ensure it is correctly implemented and only allows intended cross-origin API requests.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) against the API (Severity: Medium) - Unauthorized actions performed against the API on behalf of a user by a malicious website due to improperly configured API CORS.
    • API Data Breaches due to CORS Misconfiguration (Severity: Medium) - Unauthorized access to sensitive API data by malicious websites due to overly permissive API CORS policies.
  • Impact:
    • CSRF against the API: Moderately reduces risk.
    • API Data Breaches due to CORS Misconfiguration: Moderately reduces risk.
  • Currently Implemented: Default - Default CORS configuration is enabled in dingo/api, which might be too permissive (e.g., allowing wildcard origins) for API access.
  • Missing Implementation: Need to review and restrict API CORS configuration to only allow specific trusted origins, methods, and headers for API access. Need to test the configured API CORS policies thoroughly.