Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
61 lines (50 loc) · 6.58 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

61 lines (50 loc) · 6.58 KB

Threat Model Analysis for dingo/api

Threat: JWT Secret Key Compromise

  • Description: An attacker obtains the secret key used by dingo/api's JWT authentication handler for signing and verifying JWTs. This could happen if the secret is exposed due to a dingo/api configuration issue (e.g., a default secret not being changed, or an insecure way of loading the secret that dingo/api might inadvertently encourage). The attacker can then forge valid JWTs, impersonating any user.
    • Impact: Complete system compromise. The attacker gains full control over the API.
    • API Component Affected: Authentication middleware (specifically, the JWT authentication handler within dingo/api/auth).
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Never use default secret keys provided by dingo/api (if any). Always generate a strong, unique secret.
      • Use environment variables or a secure configuration management system (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) to store the secret key, following best practices as recommended by the dingo/api documentation.
      • Implement key rotation, following dingo/api's recommended procedures (if any).
      • Ensure that dingo/api is configured to load the secret key securely, avoiding any insecure defaults or practices.

Threat: Rate Limiting Bypass (Due to dingo/api Vulnerability)

  • Description: An attacker bypasses dingo/api's rate limiting due to a vulnerability within the rate limiting implementation itself (e.g., a race condition, logic flaw, or incorrect counting in the dingo/api code). This is distinct from bypassing rate limiting due to application-level misconfiguration.
    • Impact: Denial of service (DoS). The API becomes unavailable.
    • API Component Affected: Rate limiting middleware (dingo/api/middleware/rate and the underlying rate limiter implementation used by dingo/api).
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Keep dingo/api updated to the latest version to address any known rate limiting vulnerabilities.
      • Monitor dingo/api's issue tracker and security advisories for reports of rate limiting bypasses.
      • If a vulnerability is found, apply the recommended patch or workaround provided by the dingo/api maintainers.
      • Consider using a different, more robust rate limiting implementation if supported by dingo/api and if the built-in one is proven vulnerable.

Threat: Unvalidated Redirects After Authentication (Within dingo/api's Flow)

  • Description: If dingo/api's built-in authentication flow includes redirection logic, and that logic does not properly validate the redirect URL, an attacker could craft a malicious request that redirects the user to a phishing site. This is specifically about a vulnerability within dingo/api's own handling of redirects, not custom redirect logic added by the application.
    • Impact: User accounts compromised through phishing.
    • API Component Affected: Authentication middleware and any built-in redirect handling within dingo/api/auth.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • If dingo/api provides configuration options for redirect URLs after authentication, ensure they are set to a whitelist of allowed URLs.
      • If dingo/api has any built-in redirect functionality, examine its code and documentation carefully to ensure it performs proper validation. If not, report it as a vulnerability.
      • Avoid using any built-in dingo/api redirect features that are not explicitly documented as secure and validated.

Threat: Dependency Vulnerabilities (Impacting dingo/api Directly)

  • Description: dingo/api itself, or a direct dependency that dingo/api relies on for core functionality, contains a known vulnerability that can be exploited. This is about vulnerabilities in the libraries that dingo/api uses, not vulnerabilities in the application using dingo/api.
    • Impact: Varies widely (High to Critical) depending on the specific vulnerability in the dependency. Could lead to anything from DoS to RCE through the vulnerable dingo/api component.
    • API Component Affected: Potentially any part of dingo/api that relies on the vulnerable dependency.
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the dependency vulnerability)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Regularly update dingo/api and all its dependencies to the latest versions.
      • Use a dependency management tool (e.g., Go modules) to track and manage dependencies.
      • Use a vulnerability scanner (e.g., snyk, govulncheck) to identify known vulnerabilities in dingo/api and its direct dependencies.
      • Monitor security advisories and mailing lists for dingo/api and its dependencies.

Threat: Improper Input Validation in Request Transformers (Vulnerability within dingo/api)

  • Description: If dingo/api's request transformer logic itself contains a vulnerability that allows malicious input to bypass validation even when struct tags are used correctly, this would be a direct dingo/api issue. This is not about missing or incorrect struct tags in the application code, but a flaw in how dingo/api processes those tags.
    • Impact: Varies (High to Critical) depending on how the bypassed validation is used. Could lead to injection attacks or other vulnerabilities.
    • API Component Affected: Request transformers (dingo/api/request).
    • Risk Severity: High (potentially Critical)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Keep dingo/api updated to the latest version.
      • Monitor dingo/api's issue tracker and security advisories for reports of vulnerabilities in the request transformer.
      • If a vulnerability is found, apply the recommended patch or workaround.
      • As a defense-in-depth measure, even if dingo/api's validation is believed to be secure, implement additional input validation and sanitization in your application logic, especially before using data in sensitive operations. This mitigates the risk of undiscovered vulnerabilities in dingo/api.