Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
29 lines (24 loc) · 5.89 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

29 lines (24 loc) · 5.89 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for doctrine/inflector

Attack Surface: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

  • Description: Attackers exploit vulnerabilities in regular expressions used by doctrine/inflector to cause excessive backtracking. This leads to high CPU usage, potentially resulting in a denial of service.
  • How Inflector Contributes: doctrine/inflector relies heavily on regular expressions for its core inflection logic. Unoptimized or complex regex patterns within the library can be vulnerable to ReDoS attacks when processing specifically crafted input strings.
  • Example: An attacker crafts a long, malicious string and submits it to an application endpoint that utilizes doctrine/inflector for string manipulation (e.g., generating URL slugs, transforming user-provided names). This string is designed to trigger exponential backtracking in one of the inflector's regular expressions, causing the server to become unresponsive and denying service to legitimate users.
  • Impact: Service unavailability, application downtime, resource exhaustion, potential server crash, significant impact on application availability and user experience.
  • Risk Severity: High (Exploitable ReDoS vulnerabilities can have a significant impact on application availability and are often considered high severity).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Thorough Regex Review and Hardening (Library Level): Ideally, the doctrine/inflector library maintainers should conduct a comprehensive review of all regular expressions used within the library. Complex or potentially vulnerable regexes should be refactored for efficiency and ReDoS resistance. Consider using alternative, non-regex based approaches where feasible within the library's logic.
    • Input Validation and Sanitization (Application Level - Critical): Implement robust input validation and sanitization before passing any user-provided strings to the doctrine/inflector library. This is a critical mitigation at the application level. Limit input string length drastically, restrict allowed character sets, and consider rejecting inputs that match suspicious patterns. Treat input to inflector with extreme caution, especially from untrusted sources.
    • Rate Limiting (Application Level): Implement aggressive rate limiting on any application features or endpoints that utilize doctrine/inflector, especially if they process user-supplied input. This can help to mitigate the impact of a ReDoS attack by limiting the number of malicious requests an attacker can send.
    • Resource Monitoring and Alerting (Operational Level): Continuously monitor server CPU and memory usage. Set up real-time alerts to immediately detect unusual spikes in resource consumption that could indicate a ReDoS attack targeting the inflector. Automated mitigation or throttling mechanisms based on resource usage could be considered.
    • Regular Updates (Both Library and Application Level): Ensure the doctrine/inflector library is always updated to the latest stable version. Security patches addressing ReDoS vulnerabilities or improvements in regex handling may be released in newer versions. Applications should promptly adopt these updates.

Attack Surface: Dependency Vulnerabilities (Critical if in Inflector)

  • Description: Critical security vulnerabilities discovered within the doctrine/inflector library itself could be directly exploited by attackers targeting applications that depend on it.
  • How Inflector Contributes: As a direct dependency, any critical vulnerability in doctrine/inflector's code becomes a critical vulnerability in any application using it. This is a fundamental aspect of dependency management and supply chain security.
  • Example: Hypothetically, a critical vulnerability is discovered in doctrine/inflector that allows for remote code execution by providing a specially crafted input string that exploits a flaw in the library's processing logic. Applications using a vulnerable version of doctrine/inflector become directly susceptible to remote code execution attacks if they process untrusted input using the library.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), complete compromise of the application and potentially the underlying server, data breaches, full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
  • Risk Severity: Critical (Remote Code Execution vulnerabilities are almost always classified as Critical due to their severe impact).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Immediate Updates (Critical): Upon notification of a critical vulnerability in doctrine/inflector, applications must be updated to the patched version immediately. This is the most crucial and time-sensitive mitigation. Automated dependency update mechanisms and rapid deployment pipelines are essential for this.
    • Proactive Vulnerability Monitoring (Application Level): Continuously monitor security advisories, vulnerability databases (e.g., CVE databases, security mailing lists), and the doctrine/inflector project's release notes and security announcements for any reported vulnerabilities.
    • Dependency Scanning and Management (Development and CI/CD): Integrate dependency scanning tools into the development process and CI/CD pipelines. These tools automatically detect known vulnerabilities in project dependencies, including doctrine/inflector, and alert developers to necessary updates.
    • Security Audits (Library Level - Ideally): Ideally, the doctrine/inflector library itself should undergo periodic security audits by security experts to proactively identify and address potential vulnerabilities before they are exploited in the wild. This is the responsibility of the library maintainers and community.