Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
44 lines (34 loc) · 5.24 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

44 lines (34 loc) · 5.24 KB

Threat Model Analysis for doctrine/inflector

Threat: Unexpected Pluralization/Singularization Leading to Resource Misidentification

  • Threat: Unexpected Pluralization/Singularization Leading to Resource Misidentification

    • Description: An attacker provides a crafted input string to a function utilizing the inflector. Due to a bug, edge case, or unexpected behavior within the inflector itself, an incorrect plural or singular form is generated. This incorrect form is then used to access a resource (database table, file, API endpoint). The vulnerability lies in the inflector's incorrect transformation, not in how the application uses the result (that would be an indirect threat).
    • Impact: The application accesses the wrong resource, potentially leading to data leakage, data corruption, or denial of service. The attacker might gain unauthorized access or disrupt functionality because of the inflector's error.
    • Affected Component: Inflector::pluralize(), Inflector::singularize(), and any custom rules added to the inflector.
    • Risk Severity: High.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Comprehensive Testing: Thoroughly test the inflector with a wide range of inputs, including edge cases, unusual words, and potentially malicious strings designed to expose inflector bugs.
      • Regular Updates: Keep the doctrine/inflector library updated to the latest version to benefit from bug fixes.
      • Input Validation (Pre-Inflector): While the core issue is the inflector, validating input before it reaches the inflector can limit the attack surface. Focus on character sets and expected patterns.
      • Contextual Validation (Post-Inflector): Although the threat is the inflector's incorrect output, validating that output in its usage context (e.g., checking if a generated table name exists) adds a layer of defense.

Threat: Tampering with the Inflector Library

  • Threat: Tampering with the Inflector Library

    • Description: An attacker gains access to the server and directly modifies the doctrine/inflector library files. This is a direct attack on the inflector itself. The modified library now produces altered or malicious results, regardless of the input.
    • Impact: The attacker can deliberately manipulate the inflector's output to achieve specific malicious goals, leading to data breaches, system compromise, or denial of service. The impact is broad because any use of the inflector is now compromised.
    • Affected Component: The entire doctrine/inflector library.
    • Risk Severity: Critical.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Dependency Management with Integrity Checks: Use Composer with composer.lock to ensure the integrity of installed dependencies. This helps detect unauthorized modifications.
      • File Integrity Monitoring (FIM): Implement FIM to detect any changes to critical files, including the inflector library. This is crucial.
      • Server Security: Implement strong server security measures (firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems, access controls) to prevent unauthorized access and modification of files. This is the primary defense.
      • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits to identify and address vulnerabilities, including potential weaknesses that could allow file tampering.

Threat: Denial of Service via Complex Input Exploiting Inflector Bug

  • Threat: Denial of Service via Complex Input Exploiting Inflector Bug

    • Description: An attacker provides an extremely long or complex input string specifically crafted to exploit a bug or algorithmic inefficiency within the inflector itself. This is distinct from a general DoS; the vulnerability must reside within the inflector's code. The inflector consumes excessive resources, leading to DoS.
    • Impact: Application becomes unresponsive or crashes, preventing legitimate users from accessing it. The attack succeeds because of a flaw in the inflector.
    • Affected Component: All inflector methods (Inflector::pluralize(), Inflector::singularize(), etc.), depending on the specific vulnerability.
    • Risk Severity: High (assuming a significant, exploitable bug exists).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Regular Updates: Keep the library updated to the latest version, as this is the most likely way a DoS-causing bug would be fixed.
      • Performance Testing (Targeted): Conduct performance testing specifically targeting the inflector with a variety of complex and unusual inputs to identify potential vulnerabilities before they are exploited.
      • Input Length Limits (Pre-Inflector): While the core issue is an inflector bug, limiting input length before calling the inflector reduces the attack surface.
      • Resource Limits (System-Level): Set resource limits (memory, CPU time) for PHP processes. This is a general mitigation, but it helps contain the impact of a successful DoS.