Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
91 lines (80 loc) · 12.1 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

91 lines (80 loc) · 12.1 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for doctrine/orm

Mitigation Strategy: Parameterize All Queries

  • Description:
    1. Step 1: Code Review (ORM Focus): Conduct a code review specifically targeting Doctrine ORM query usage within repositories and services.
    2. Step 2: Identify Raw SQL via ORM: Identify instances where raw SQL might be inadvertently constructed through Doctrine ORM, even when using QueryBuilder, if parameterization is missed.
    3. Step 3: Enforce Parameterization in DQL/QueryBuilder: Ensure all queries, whether written in DQL or using QueryBuilder, utilize parameters for dynamic values. Specifically check setParameter(), :param syntax in DQL, and avoid string concatenation within query construction.
    4. Step 4: ORM Configuration Review: Review Doctrine ORM configuration to ensure no settings inadvertently encourage or allow insecure query construction.
    5. Step 5: ORM-Specific Developer Training: Train developers on Doctrine ORM's parameterization features and best practices for secure query construction within the ORM context.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • SQL Injection (High Severity): Attackers can inject malicious SQL code into queries executed by Doctrine ORM, potentially leading to data breaches, data manipulation, or complete system compromise.
  • Impact:
    • SQL Injection: High Risk Reduction - Parameterization within Doctrine ORM effectively neutralizes SQL injection vulnerabilities originating from ORM-driven queries.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Partially implemented in new feature development within src/Repository classes, where QueryBuilder with parameterization is generally used.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Legacy modules in src/Controller actions and some older src/Repository methods might still have queries constructed without proper parameterization within the Doctrine ORM context. Requires a dedicated code audit focused on ORM query usage and refactoring.

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Entity Validation Constraints

  • Description:
    1. Step 1: Review Entity Definitions: Examine all Doctrine Entity definitions (src/Entity) for existing validation constraints (annotations, YAML, or XML).
    2. Step 2: Define Comprehensive Constraints: Add or enhance validation constraints on entity properties to enforce data integrity at the ORM level. Use constraints like @Assert\NotBlank, @Assert\Email, @Assert\Length, @Assert\UniqueEntity, etc., directly within entity definitions.
    3. Step 3: Enable Validation Groups (if needed): Utilize validation groups to apply different sets of constraints in different contexts (e.g., create vs. update operations).
    4. Step 4: Trigger Validation Before Persistence: Ensure that Doctrine's entity validation is triggered before entities are persisted or updated in the database. This is typically handled automatically by frameworks like Symfony when using forms or the entity manager.
    5. Step 5: Test Entity Validation: Write unit tests specifically to verify that entity validation constraints are correctly enforced by Doctrine ORM.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Data Integrity Issues (Medium Severity): Invalid data persisted through Doctrine ORM can lead to application errors, unexpected behavior, and data corruption within the ORM managed entities.
    • Mass Assignment Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity - Indirect): Entity validation can indirectly help mitigate mass assignment issues by ensuring that even if unintended properties are set, they must still pass validation rules.
  • Impact:
    • Data Integrity Issues: High Risk Reduction - Entity validation ensures data managed by Doctrine ORM conforms to defined constraints, improving data quality and application stability.
    • Mass Assignment Vulnerabilities: Low to Medium Risk Reduction - Provides a secondary layer of defense against mass assignment by validating data even if unintended properties are modified.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Entity validation constraints are partially implemented in some entities within src/Entity, particularly for form-related entities.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Validation constraints are not consistently and comprehensively applied across all entities. A systematic review of all entities is needed to define and implement appropriate validation rules for all relevant properties. Validation groups might be underutilized for different operation contexts.

Mitigation Strategy: Filter Data Based on User Permissions in Queries (ORM Level)

  • Description:
    1. Step 1: Identify Authorization-Sensitive Entities: Determine which Doctrine Entities contain data that requires authorization-based filtering.
    2. Step 2: Implement DQL WHERE Clauses: When querying authorization-sensitive entities using DQL or QueryBuilder, incorporate WHERE clauses to filter results based on the current user's permissions. Retrieve user context information within services or repositories and use it to build dynamic WHERE conditions.
    3. Step 3: Utilize QueryBuilder Conditions: Leverage QueryBuilder's conditional methods (andWhere, orWhere) to dynamically add authorization filters to queries based on user roles or permissions.
    4. Step 4: Consider Doctrine Data Filtering (Advanced): Explore Doctrine's Data Filtering feature (if suitable for your authorization model) as a more automated way to apply filters based on user context directly within the ORM layer. (Note: Use with caution and thorough understanding of its implications).
    5. Step 5: Review ORM Query Logic for Authorization: Regularly review ORM query logic in repositories and services to ensure authorization filters are consistently and correctly applied to prevent unauthorized data retrieval through Doctrine.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Data Leakage (Medium Severity): Users might be able to retrieve data they are not authorized to see if Doctrine ORM queries do not properly filter results based on permissions.
    • Unauthorized Access (Medium Severity - Data Level): Even with route access control, insufficient data filtering in ORM queries can still lead to unauthorized access to specific data records managed by Doctrine.
  • Impact:
    • Data Leakage: Medium to High Risk Reduction - Filtering queries within Doctrine ORM ensures that users only retrieve data they are authorized to access through the ORM, preventing data leakage at the data access layer.
    • Unauthorized Access (Data Level): Medium Risk Reduction - Adds a layer of data-level access control directly within ORM queries, complementing application-level authorization.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Basic filtering implemented in some repositories (src/Repository) for specific entities, often based on user ownership, using manual WHERE clauses in QueryBuilder.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Consistent and comprehensive data filtering is missing across all repositories and queries involving authorization-sensitive entities. A more standardized and potentially automated approach to applying authorization filters within Doctrine ORM queries is needed. Doctrine Data Filtering feature could be evaluated for suitability.

Mitigation Strategy: Optimize DQL Queries and Database Schema (ORM Performance)

  • Description:
    1. Step 1: Profile DQL Queries: Use Doctrine's query profiling tools or database query analyzers to identify slow or inefficient DQL queries.
    2. Step 2: Optimize DQL Syntax: Refactor inefficient DQL queries to improve performance. Consider using JOIN FETCH judiciously to reduce N+1 query problems, but be mindful of potential performance impacts of large result sets. Optimize WHERE clauses and indexing strategies within DQL.
    3. Step 3: Database Schema Review (ORM Context): Review the database schema in relation to Doctrine Entities and mappings. Ensure appropriate indexes are defined on database columns used in WHERE clauses and JOIN conditions within DQL queries.
    4. Step 4: Eager vs. Lazy Loading Optimization: Carefully choose between eager and lazy loading strategies in Doctrine entity mappings based on application usage patterns to optimize query performance and reduce database load.
    5. Step 5: Monitor ORM Performance: Continuously monitor Doctrine ORM query performance in production environments to identify and address any performance bottlenecks that could lead to resource exhaustion or DoS vulnerabilities.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Performance-Based Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Inefficient Doctrine ORM queries can lead to performance bottlenecks, slow response times, and potentially resource exhaustion, making the application vulnerable to DoS attacks.
  • Impact:
    • Performance-Based Denial of Service (DoS): Medium Risk Reduction - Optimizing DQL queries and database schema improves application performance and reduces the risk of performance-based DoS attacks by minimizing resource consumption and improving response times of ORM operations.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Basic query optimization is performed reactively when performance issues are identified. Database indexes are generally in place for primary keys and foreign keys.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Proactive DQL query profiling and optimization are not consistently performed. A systematic approach to ORM performance monitoring and optimization needs to be implemented, including regular query analysis and schema reviews in the context of Doctrine mappings.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Caching Strategies (ORM Level)

  • Description:
    1. Step 1: Configure Doctrine Caching: Enable and configure Doctrine's caching mechanisms: result cache, query cache, and second-level cache. Choose appropriate cache providers (e.g., Redis, Memcached, ArrayCache for development).
    2. Step 2: Cache Configuration Review: Review Doctrine's cache configuration to ensure it is optimized for performance and data consistency. Configure cache TTLs (Time-To-Live) appropriately for different types of data.
    3. Step 3: Cache Invalidation Strategies: Implement cache invalidation strategies to ensure data consistency when entities are updated or modified. Consider using cache tags or versioning for invalidation.
    4. Step 4: Monitor Cache Performance: Monitor Doctrine's cache performance and hit rates to ensure caching is effective and identify any potential issues.
    5. Step 5: ORM Cache Testing: Test caching configurations thoroughly to verify that caching is working as expected and does not introduce data inconsistencies or unexpected behavior in ORM operations.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Performance-Based Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Lack of caching can lead to excessive database load, slow response times, and vulnerability to DoS attacks due to repeated database queries executed by Doctrine ORM.
  • Impact:
    • Performance-Based Denial of Service (DoS): Medium Risk Reduction - Implementing Doctrine caching reduces database load and improves application performance, mitigating the risk of performance-based DoS attacks by serving frequently accessed data from cache instead of the database.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Result cache is enabled using ArrayCache for development environments. Query cache and second-level cache are not fully configured or utilized in production.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Production-ready caching (using Redis or Memcached) needs to be configured for result cache, query cache, and potentially second-level cache. Cache invalidation strategies need to be defined and implemented. Comprehensive testing and monitoring of caching performance are required.