Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
55 lines (48 loc) · 7.33 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

55 lines (48 loc) · 7.33 KB

Threat Model Analysis for doctrine/orm

Threat: DQL Injection (Second-Order)

  • Description: An attacker crafts malicious input that is stored in the database. Later, this seemingly benign data is used unsafely within a Doctrine Query Language (DQL) query or QueryBuilder call, leading to unintended query execution. The attacker exploits a vulnerability in how Doctrine constructs queries, not just general input handling. The key is that the vulnerability exists within Doctrine's DQL parsing or QueryBuilder logic, even if parameterized queries are intended to be used. A hypothetical example: a bug in Doctrine's handling of a specific DQL function or operator that allows injection even with parameters.
    • Impact:
      • Unauthorized data access.
      • Unauthorized data modification.
      • Potential for complete database compromise.
    • ORM Component Affected:
      • Doctrine\ORM\QueryBuilder: Vulnerabilities in how QueryBuilder methods construct SQL queries from user-influenced data, even when parameters are used.
      • Doctrine\ORM\EntityManager::createQuery(): Vulnerabilities in the DQL parser itself, allowing injection even with parameterized DQL.
      • Custom repository methods that internally construct DQL queries in an unsafe manner (even if they intend to use parameters, a bug could exist).
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Parameterized Queries (Primary Defense): Doctrine's QueryBuilder and DQL are designed to use parameterized queries. Ensure this is always the case. This is the primary defense, but this threat focuses on failures of that defense.
      • Regular Doctrine Updates: This is crucial. The core mitigation is to keep Doctrine ORM updated to the latest stable version to patch any discovered vulnerabilities in its DQL parsing or QueryBuilder logic. This threat assumes a vulnerability within Doctrine itself.
      • Code Reviews (Focus on DQL): Thoroughly review any code that interacts with DQL or QueryBuilder, even if it appears to use parameters correctly. Look for any unusual string manipulation or complex logic that might introduce vulnerabilities.
      • Input Validation (Secondary Defense): While not the primary defense against this ORM-specific threat, validating input before it's stored can help prevent storing malicious data that could be exploited if a Doctrine vulnerability exists.

Threat: Unintended Field Update via flush() (ORM Logic Flaw)

  • Description: An attacker provides input that, while seemingly valid for updating a specific field, causes Doctrine's EntityManager::flush() method to update other fields unintentionally due to a flaw within Doctrine's change tracking logic. This is not about simply providing unexpected input; it's about exploiting a bug or misconfiguration in how Doctrine determines which fields to update. For example, a hypothetical bug in Doctrine's UnitOfWork might incorrectly mark a field as "dirty" even though it hasn't been changed.
    • Impact:
      • Data corruption.
      • Bypassing business logic.
      • Potential for privilege escalation.
    • ORM Component Affected:
      • Doctrine\ORM\EntityManager::flush(): The core method where the vulnerability manifests.
      • Doctrine\ORM\UnitOfWork: The internal component responsible for tracking changes. A bug here is the likely root cause.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Regular Doctrine Updates: Keep Doctrine ORM updated to the latest stable version. This is the primary mitigation, as it addresses potential bugs in the UnitOfWork or flush() logic.
      • Explicit Field Updates (Best Practice): While not a direct mitigation for a Doctrine bug, explicitly setting only the fields that should be changed (using setters) is a good practice that reduces the attack surface. It makes it less likely that a Doctrine bug could be exploited.
      • Doctrine Event Listeners (preUpdate - for Detection): Implement a preUpdate event listener to inspect the changes being made to an entity before they are persisted. This can help detect if unintended fields are being updated, even if the root cause is a Doctrine bug. This is a detection mechanism, not a prevention mechanism for the underlying bug.
      • DTOs (Reduces Attack Surface): Using DTOs, as described before, limits the data that can be passed to the entity, reducing the likelihood of triggering a hypothetical Doctrine bug.

Threat: Bypassing Entity-Level Access Control (ORM Relationship Flaw)

  • Description: An attacker manipulates object IDs or relationships to access or modify entities they shouldn't have access to, exploiting a flaw in how Doctrine enforces relationships or ownership. This is not about simply providing an incorrect ID; it's about exploiting a bug or misconfiguration in Doctrine's relationship management. For example, a hypothetical bug in how Doctrine handles cascading deletes or updates might allow an attacker to bypass ownership checks. Or, a misconfigured @JoinColumn with incorrect nullable or onDelete settings could be exploited.
    • Impact:
      • Unauthorized data access.
      • Unauthorized data modification.
      • Violation of data integrity.
    • ORM Component Affected:
      • Relationship Mapping (Annotations): Incorrectly configured @ManyToOne, @OneToMany, @JoinColumn, cascade, orphanRemoval, or nullable options. This is where the vulnerability would likely reside.
      • Doctrine\ORM\EntityManager::find(), getReference(): If the logic for finding or referencing entities has a flaw that allows bypassing ownership checks.
      • Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection: If a bug allows direct manipulation of the collection, bypassing the owning entity's access controls.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Regular Doctrine Updates: Keep Doctrine ORM updated to address potential bugs in its relationship management logic.
      • Correct Relationship Definitions: Thoroughly review and ensure that all relationships between entities are correctly defined using Doctrine's annotations. Pay extremely close attention to cascade, orphanRemoval, nullable, and onDelete options. This is the primary mitigation.
      • Doctrine Event Listeners (postLoad, prePersist, preUpdate - for Enforcement): Use event listeners to implement additional security checks, beyond what Doctrine's annotations provide. postLoad can verify ownership after an entity is loaded. prePersist and preUpdate can prevent unauthorized creation or modification of relationships. These listeners act as a second layer of defense.
      • Secure Object Retrieval (Best Practice): As a general best practice, never directly use user-provided IDs to fetch entities without verifying ownership or access rights within your application logic. This reduces the attack surface, even if a Doctrine vulnerability exists.