Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
245 lines (189 loc) · 24.5 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

245 lines (189 loc) · 24.5 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Drupal Core

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep security analysis is to thoroughly evaluate the security posture of Drupal core, based on the provided security design review. This analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities and weaknesses inherent in Drupal core's architecture, components, and development lifecycle. The focus is on providing actionable, Drupal-specific security recommendations and mitigation strategies to enhance the platform's overall security and reduce business risks associated with its use.

Scope:

This analysis encompasses the following aspects of Drupal core, as outlined in the security design review:

  • Architecture and Components: Analyzing the Context, Container, Deployment, and Build diagrams to understand the system's architecture, key components (Web Server, PHP Runtime, Drupal Core Application, Modules, Themes, Database), and data flow.
  • Security Controls: Evaluating existing and recommended security controls, including secure coding practices, security release processes, input validation, output encoding, authentication, authorization, cryptography, and testing frameworks.
  • Security Requirements: Assessing the defined security requirements for authentication, authorization, input validation, and cryptography in the context of Drupal core's functionalities.
  • Risk Assessment: Considering the identified critical business processes, sensitive data, and associated risks to prioritize security concerns.
  • Development and Build Pipeline: Examining the security of the Drupal core development and release process, including code review, CI/CD, and distribution mechanisms.

The analysis will primarily focus on Drupal core itself and its immediate ecosystem, as described in the provided documentation. It will not extend to a comprehensive security audit of the entire Drupal contributed module ecosystem or specific Drupal site configurations, except where they directly relate to core security considerations.

Methodology:

This deep analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Architecture Decomposition and Threat Modeling: Based on the C4 diagrams and descriptions, we will decompose Drupal core into its key components and analyze the data flow between them. We will implicitly apply threat modeling principles to identify potential threats and vulnerabilities at each component and interaction point. This will involve considering common web application vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10) in the context of Drupal's architecture.
  2. Security Control Assessment: We will evaluate the effectiveness of the existing security controls listed in the security posture section. We will also assess the potential impact and benefits of the recommended security controls.
  3. Requirement Gap Analysis: We will compare the defined security requirements against the described architecture and existing controls to identify any potential gaps or areas for improvement.
  4. Risk-Based Prioritization: We will prioritize security concerns based on the identified business risks and the sensitivity of the data being protected, as outlined in the risk assessment section.
  5. Actionable Recommendation Generation: Based on the analysis, we will generate specific, actionable, and Drupal core-tailored security recommendations and mitigation strategies. These recommendations will be practical and directly applicable to the Drupal core development team and processes.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

2.1. C4 Context Diagram - Drupal Ecosystem

  • Drupal Core:

    • Security Implications: As the central component, Drupal core is the primary target for attacks. Vulnerabilities in core can have widespread impact across all Drupal websites. The responsibilities listed (content management, user management, API provision, security framework) are all critical from a security perspective.
    • Threats: SQL Injection, XSS, CSRF, Access Control bypass, Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS).
    • Existing Controls: Input validation, output encoding, authentication/authorization, cryptographic API, security updates are crucial, but their effectiveness needs continuous monitoring and improvement.

  • Content Editors, Site Visitors, Site Administrators, Developers (Users):

    • Security Implications: User accounts are attack vectors. Compromised accounts can lead to data breaches, content manipulation, and site takeover. Site administrators with misconfigurations can introduce vulnerabilities. Developers writing insecure code in modules/themes can also create risks.
    • Threats: Phishing, credential stuffing, brute-force attacks, social engineering (for user accounts). Misconfiguration, insecure coding practices (for administrators and developers).
    • Existing Controls: Authentication, authorization, secure password management, RBAC are in place, but user education and strong password policies are also essential.

  • Web Server (Apache/Nginx):

    • Security Implications: Web server vulnerabilities can directly expose Drupal and its data. Misconfigurations can lead to information disclosure or access control bypass.
    • Threats: Web server exploits, DoS attacks, information disclosure, misconfiguration vulnerabilities.
    • Existing Controls: Web server hardening, access control, DDoS protection, security updates are mentioned as controls, but specific configurations and monitoring are crucial.

  • Database Server (MySQL/PostgreSQL):

    • Security Implications: Database compromise is catastrophic, leading to data breaches and complete site takeover.
    • Threats: SQL Injection (if not fully mitigated by Drupal core), database exploits, insider threats, weak database credentials.
    • Existing Controls: Database access control, encryption at rest, security updates are listed, but strong password policies, principle of least privilege, and regular security audits are vital.

  • Web Browser:

    • Security Implications: While not directly a Drupal component, browser vulnerabilities can be exploited through Drupal websites (e.g., XSS).
    • Threats: Client-side XSS exploitation, drive-by downloads, phishing attacks targeting users through Drupal sites.
    • Existing Controls: Drupal's XSS prevention mechanisms are the primary defense, along with browser security features (CSP, XSS protection).

  • External APIs/Services:

    • Security Implications: Integrations introduce new attack surfaces. Insecure API communication or vulnerabilities in external services can impact Drupal.
    • Threats: API injection attacks, man-in-the-middle attacks, data breaches in external services, reliance on insecure external APIs.
    • Existing Controls: HTTPS, API authentication/authorization, input validation of external data are mentioned, but robust API security practices and monitoring are needed.

2.2. C4 Container Diagram - Drupal Internals

  • Web Server (Apache/Nginx) Container:

    • Security Implications: Same as Context Diagram, but focusing on container-level hardening and configuration.
    • Threats: Container escape vulnerabilities (less likely in managed environments but still a consideration), misconfiguration within the container.
    • Existing Controls: Container hardening, access control, regular updates of the web server software within the container.

  • PHP Runtime Container:

    • Security Implications: PHP vulnerabilities or insecure configurations can be exploited by Drupal applications.
    • Threats: PHP exploits, insecure PHP extensions, misconfiguration of PHP settings.
    • Existing Controls: PHP configuration hardening, disabling unnecessary extensions, regular PHP updates within the container.

  • Drupal Core Application Container:

    • Security Implications: This is where most Drupal core code resides. Vulnerabilities here are critical.
    • Threats: All web application vulnerabilities (SQL Injection, XSS, CSRF, Access Control bypass, RCE) within the Drupal core codebase.
    • Existing Controls: Input validation, output encoding, authentication/authorization mechanisms, cryptographic API, security updates are the primary defenses. SAST/DAST integration (recommended) would significantly enhance these.

  • Drupal Modules Container:

    • Security Implications: Contributed modules are a significant source of vulnerabilities due to varying security review quality and maintainer practices.
    • Threats: Vulnerabilities in contributed modules (SQL Injection, XSS, CSRF, Access Control bypass, RCE), insecure module interactions with core.
    • Existing Controls: Community-driven security review (variable effectiveness), module update management. Improved security review process (recommended) is crucial.

  • Drupal Themes Container:

    • Security Implications: Themes can introduce XSS vulnerabilities, especially if they use insecure JavaScript or template handling.
    • Threats: XSS vulnerabilities in themes, insecure template rendering, information disclosure through theme files.
    • Existing Controls: Theme security best practices (partially enforced by community guidelines), theme update management.

  • Database Server (MySQL/PostgreSQL) Container:

    • Security Implications: Same as Context Diagram, but focusing on container-level database security.
    • Threats: Database exploits, misconfiguration within the database container, weak database user permissions.
    • Existing Controls: Database access control, encryption at rest, regular security updates, database hardening within the container.

2.3. Deployment Diagram - AWS Cloud Environment

  • AWS Application Load Balancer (ALB):

    • Security Implications: ALB is the entry point. Misconfigurations or vulnerabilities here can expose the entire application.
    • Threats: ALB misconfiguration (e.g., open ports, weak SSL/TLS settings), DoS attacks targeting the ALB.
    • Existing Controls: DDoS protection (AWS Shield), SSL/TLS encryption, access logging, security groups. Proper configuration and monitoring of these controls are essential.

  • EC2 Instances (Web Servers):

    • Security Implications: EC2 instances host the Drupal application. Instance compromise leads to application compromise.
    • Threats: EC2 instance vulnerabilities, unauthorized access to instances, malware infection, misconfiguration of security groups and IAM roles.
    • Existing Controls: Instance hardening, security groups, regular patching, IDS, IAM roles. Robust instance hardening and security monitoring are crucial.

  • AWS RDS (PostgreSQL):

    • Security Implications: RDS hosts the database. RDS compromise leads to data breach.
    • Threats: RDS vulnerabilities, unauthorized access to RDS, weak database credentials, misconfiguration of RDS security settings.
    • Existing Controls: Database encryption at rest/in transit, database access control, regular patching, automated backups, security monitoring. Strong password policies and principle of least privilege for database access are vital.

  • AWS CloudFront (CDN):

    • Security Implications: CDN caches content. Misconfigurations can lead to caching sensitive data or serving outdated content after security updates.
    • Threats: CDN misconfiguration (e.g., caching sensitive data, insecure cache invalidation), DoS attacks targeting the CDN edge.
    • Existing Controls: DDoS protection (AWS Shield), SSL/TLS encryption, access logging, geo-restrictions, WAF integration. Proper cache configuration and invalidation strategies are important for security.

2.4. Build Diagram - Drupal Core Development

  • GitHub Repository (Drupal Core):

    • Security Implications: Compromise of the repository can lead to malicious code injection into Drupal core.
    • Threats: Unauthorized access to the repository, compromised developer accounts, malicious pull requests, supply chain attacks.
    • Existing Controls: Access control (GitHub permissions), branch protection, audit logging, vulnerability scanning (GitHub Advanced Security). Strong access control and multi-factor authentication for developers are crucial.

  • Code Review Process:

    • Security Implications: Ineffective code review can miss security vulnerabilities before they are merged into core.
    • Threats: Security vulnerabilities slipping through code review, inconsistent review quality, lack of security-focused review guidelines.
    • Existing Controls: Peer review by experienced developers. Enhancing security-focused code review guidelines and training reviewers on security best practices is needed.

  • DrupalCI (Continuous Integration):

    • Security Implications: Compromised CI system can inject malicious code into build artifacts. Insecure CI pipeline can introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Threats: Compromised CI infrastructure, insecure CI configurations, vulnerabilities in CI tools, lack of security scanning in CI.
    • Existing Controls: Secure CI/CD pipeline, access control to CI system. Integrating SAST/DAST into DrupalCI (recommended) is vital for automated security checks.

  • Build Artifacts (Packages, Patches):

    • Security Implications: Tampered build artifacts can distribute malicious code to Drupal users.
    • Threats: Man-in-the-middle attacks during download, compromised artifact storage, lack of integrity checks for artifacts.
    • Existing Controls: Integrity checks (checksums, signatures), secure storage of artifacts, access control to artifact storage. Strong cryptographic signatures for releases and patches are recommended.

  • Drupal.org (Distribution):

    • Security Implications: Compromised Drupal.org can distribute malicious Drupal core versions or security updates.
    • Threats: Compromise of Drupal.org infrastructure, distribution of backdoored Drupal versions, serving outdated or vulnerable versions.
    • Existing Controls: Secure web hosting, access control, integrity checks for downloads, security monitoring. Robust security measures for Drupal.org infrastructure are paramount.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow Inference

Based on the codebase (Drupal core on GitHub), documentation (Drupal.org), and the provided diagrams, we can infer the following architecture, components, and data flow:

Architecture: Drupal core follows a modular, service-oriented architecture. It's built on a foundation of PHP, leveraging a database (typically MySQL or PostgreSQL) for data persistence. The architecture is designed for extensibility through modules and themes.

Key Components:

  • Kernel: The core framework providing fundamental services like routing, request handling, dependency injection, and event dispatching.
  • Modules: Extend Drupal's functionality. Core modules provide essential features (e.g., Node, User, Taxonomy), while contributed modules offer a vast range of additional capabilities. Modules interact with the Kernel and other modules through APIs and hooks.
  • Themes: Control the presentation layer. Themes define the look and feel of the website and interact with Drupal's rendering engine to display content.
  • Database Abstraction Layer: Provides an interface to interact with different database systems, abstracting database-specific SQL syntax.
  • Entity API: Manages content entities (Nodes, Users, Taxonomy terms, etc.), providing a structured way to store, retrieve, and manipulate data.
  • Form API: Provides a framework for building and processing forms, including input validation and security features.
  • Render API: Handles the rendering of content and UI elements, including output encoding for security.
  • User and Session Management: Manages user authentication, authorization, and session handling.
  • Configuration Management: Handles site configuration, allowing for export, import, and version control of settings.
  • Plugin System: A flexible system for extending Drupal's functionality through plugins (e.g., blocks, fields, widgets).

Data Flow:

  1. User Request: A user (Site Visitor, Content Editor, Admin) sends an HTTP request to the Web Server (via Web Browser or API client).
  2. Web Server Processing: The Web Server (Apache/Nginx) receives the request and passes it to the PHP Runtime.
  3. Drupal Kernel Bootstrapping: PHP Runtime executes Drupal's index.php, which bootstraps the Drupal Kernel.
  4. Routing and Request Handling: The Kernel's routing system determines which module and controller should handle the request based on the URL.
  5. Module/Controller Execution: The appropriate module's controller is executed. This may involve:
    • Database Interaction: Fetching data from the Database Server using the Database Abstraction Layer and Entity API.
    • Business Logic Execution: Performing content management, user management, or other application logic.
    • Form Processing: Handling user input from forms using the Form API, including validation and sanitization.
    • API Interaction: Communicating with External APIs/Services.
  6. Rendering: The Render API is used to generate the HTML output based on the processed data and the active Theme. Output encoding is applied during rendering to prevent XSS.
  7. Response Generation: Drupal generates an HTTP response, which is sent back through the Web Server to the user's Web Browser or API client.
  8. Static Asset Delivery: The Web Server directly serves static assets (CSS, JavaScript, images) from the Drupal installation or CDN.

Security-Relevant Data Flow Points:

  • Input Points: User input from forms, URLs, API requests, and data from external APIs. These points require rigorous input validation and sanitization.
  • Database Interaction: SQL queries are generated and executed. Proper parameterization and database abstraction are crucial to prevent SQL injection.
  • Output Points: HTML output rendered to the browser. Output encoding is essential to prevent XSS.
  • Session Management: Session cookies and tokens are used for authentication and authorization. Secure session handling is vital to prevent session hijacking and fixation.
  • API Communication: Data exchanged with external APIs. Secure communication (HTTPS) and API authentication/authorization are necessary.
  • File Uploads: Handling of uploaded files. Proper validation and storage are needed to prevent malicious file uploads and directory traversal vulnerabilities.

4. Specific Security Recommendations for Drupal Core

Based on the analysis, here are specific security recommendations tailored to Drupal core:

  1. Enhance SAST/DAST Integration in DrupalCI:

    • Specific Recommendation: Implement comprehensive SAST and DAST tools within the DrupalCI pipeline. SAST should be integrated at the code commit/pull request stage to detect vulnerabilities early. DAST should be run against deployed Drupal instances in CI environments on a regular schedule (nightly or weekly) and on-demand for release candidates.
    • Tooling Examples: For SAST, consider tools like SonarQube, Fortify, or Checkmarx. For DAST, consider OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite Pro (headless), or Acunetix.
    • Actionable Steps:
      • Evaluate and select appropriate SAST/DAST tools compatible with Drupal's PHP codebase and CI environment.
      • Integrate these tools into the DrupalCI configuration and workflows.
      • Configure tools with Drupal-specific rulesets and vulnerability signatures.
      • Establish processes for triaging and remediating vulnerabilities identified by SAST/DAST.

  2. Strengthen Security Review Process for Contributed Modules:

    • Specific Recommendation: Implement a tiered security review system for contributed modules. Introduce automated security scanning (using SAST/DAST tools) as a mandatory step for all new module releases and updates. For modules requesting "Drupal Security Team coverage," implement a more rigorous manual security code review process by trained security experts.
    • Actionable Steps:
      • Integrate automated security scanning tools into the Drupal.org project packaging and release process.
      • Develop clear security review guidelines and checklists for module maintainers and reviewers.
      • Establish a "Drupal Security Certified" program for modules that pass enhanced security reviews.
      • Provide training and resources to community reviewers on secure code review practices.

  3. Develop and Promote Advanced Secure Coding Training for Drupal Developers:

    • Specific Recommendation: Create and mandate comprehensive security training modules for all Drupal core developers and encourage participation from contributed module maintainers. Training should cover OWASP Top 10, Drupal-specific security best practices, common Drupal vulnerabilities, and secure coding techniques.
    • Actionable Steps:
      • Develop online security training modules with interactive exercises and quizzes.
      • Integrate security training into the Drupal core contributor onboarding process.
      • Organize regular security workshops and webinars for the Drupal community.
      • Create a "Security Champion" program to recognize and empower developers with security expertise.

  4. Enhance Guidance and Tools for Secure Drupal Site Configuration:

    • Specific Recommendation: Develop comprehensive documentation and tools to guide site administrators in securely configuring and maintaining their Drupal installations. This should include security hardening guides, automated security configuration checklists, and tools to detect common misconfigurations.
    • Actionable Steps:
      • Create a dedicated "Drupal Security Hardening Guide" on Drupal.org, covering web server, PHP, database, and Drupal-specific configurations.
      • Develop a Drupal module or Drush command to perform automated security configuration checks and provide recommendations.
      • Integrate security configuration guidance into the Drupal installation process and administrative UI.
      • Provide security dashboards within Drupal admin UI to display security status and recommendations.

  5. Improve Incident Response Procedures for Drupal Core Vulnerabilities:

    • Specific Recommendation: Formalize and document the incident response procedures for security vulnerabilities discovered in Drupal core. This should include clear roles and responsibilities, communication protocols, vulnerability disclosure policies, patching processes, and post-incident review procedures. Conduct regular incident response drills to test and improve the process.
    • Actionable Steps:
      • Document a detailed Drupal Core Security Incident Response Plan.
      • Establish a dedicated Drupal Security Incident Response Team (DSIRT) with clear roles and responsibilities.
      • Define communication channels and protocols for internal and external communication during security incidents.
      • Conduct tabletop exercises and simulated security incidents to test the response plan.
      • Regularly review and update the incident response plan based on lessons learned.

5. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

The recommendations above translate into the following actionable and tailored mitigation strategies for Drupal core:

  • Automated Vulnerability Detection: Integrate SAST/DAST into DrupalCI to proactively identify and address vulnerabilities during development, reducing the risk of introducing security flaws into core releases.
  • Proactive Module Security: Enhance the security review process for contributed modules with automated scanning and stricter guidelines to mitigate risks associated with third-party code.
  • Developer Security Awareness: Invest in security training for developers to improve secure coding practices and reduce the likelihood of introducing vulnerabilities in the first place.
  • Admin Security Empowerment: Provide site administrators with better guidance and tools to securely configure and maintain Drupal sites, minimizing misconfiguration risks.
  • Rapid Incident Response: Formalize incident response procedures to ensure swift and effective handling of security vulnerabilities, minimizing the impact of potential exploits.

These mitigation strategies are directly tailored to Drupal core's specific context, addressing the identified threats and leveraging the existing Drupal ecosystem and community. By implementing these recommendations, Drupal core can significantly strengthen its security posture, reduce business risks for Drupal users, and maintain its reputation as a secure and reliable CMS platform.