Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
77 lines (63 loc) · 8.58 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

77 lines (63 loc) · 8.58 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for egulias/emailvalidator

Objective: Compromise Application via emailvalidator (Focus on High-Risk Vectors)

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via emailvalidator
├───[OR]─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Input Injection via Email Address Field
│   ├───[AND]─ **[CRITICAL NODE]** Identify Injection Point in Application Logic Post-Validation (e.g., SQL query, command execution)
│   └───[AND]─ Craft Email Address to Inject Malicious Payload
├───[OR]─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks
│   ├───[OR]─ Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) (If applicable internally)
│   │   ├───[AND]─ **[CRITICAL NODE - Conditional]** Identify Vulnerable Regex Pattern in emailvalidator (if used)
│   │   └───[AND]─ Craft Email Address to Trigger Exponential Backtracking in Regex
│   └───[OR]─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Resource Exhaustion via Large Number of Validation Requests
│       └───[AND]─ **[CRITICAL NODE]** Send a High Volume of Complex or Invalid Email Addresses for Validation
└───[OR]─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Dependency Vulnerabilities (Less focused on emailvalidator itself, but important)
    └───[OR]─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Vulnerability in emailvalidator's Dependencies
        ├───[AND]─ **[CRITICAL NODE]** Identify Vulnerable Dependency of emailvalidator
        └───[AND]─ Exploit Vulnerability in Dependency via Application using emailvalidator

Attack Tree Path: Input Injection via Email Address Field

1. High-Risk Path: Input Injection via Email Address Field

  • Attack Vector Name: Input Injection (Specifically, focusing on SQL Injection, Command Injection, etc.)
  • Description: Even with email format validation by emailvalidator, the application might be vulnerable if it unsafely uses the validated email address in subsequent operations. This path focuses on injection vulnerabilities that can arise after validation, within the application's logic.
  • Critical Node: Identify Injection Point in Application Logic Post-Validation (e.g., SQL query, command execution)
    • Significance: This is the core vulnerability. If the application directly embeds the validated email address into SQL queries, system commands, or other sensitive operations without proper sanitization or parameterization, it creates an injection point.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Parameterized Queries (Prepared Statements): Always use parameterized queries or prepared statements when interacting with databases. This prevents SQL injection by separating SQL code from user-supplied data.
      • Input Sanitization/Escaping: If parameterized queries are not feasible in all contexts (e.g., certain ORMs or legacy code), carefully sanitize or escape the email address input before using it in sensitive operations. However, parameterization is the preferred and more robust approach.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure database users and application processes have only the necessary permissions to minimize the impact of successful injection attacks.
      • Code Review and Security Testing: Conduct thorough code reviews and penetration testing specifically looking for injection vulnerabilities where email addresses are used.

Attack Tree Path: Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks

2. High-Risk Path: Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks

  • Sub-Path 2a: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) (Conditional)

    • Attack Vector Name: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
    • Description: If emailvalidator internally uses regular expressions for email validation, poorly designed regex patterns can be vulnerable to ReDoS. Crafted email addresses can cause the regex engine to get stuck in exponential backtracking, consuming excessive CPU and leading to DoS.
    • Critical Node (Conditional): Identify Vulnerable Regex Pattern in emailvalidator (if used)
      • Significance: This node is critical if emailvalidator uses regexes for validation. Identifying a vulnerable regex pattern is the prerequisite for a ReDoS attack. (Note: You need to review the emailvalidator source code to confirm regex usage and patterns).
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Regex Review: If regexes are used, carefully review them for ReDoS vulnerabilities. Look for nested quantifiers, overlapping groups, and alternations that are common ReDoS patterns.
        • Alternative Validation Methods: Consider if regex-based validation is strictly necessary. Explore alternative, potentially more performant and less ReDoS-prone validation methods if possible.
        • Input Length Limits: Implement reasonable length limits for email address inputs to reduce the potential impact of ReDoS attacks and general resource exhaustion.
        • Resource Monitoring: Monitor CPU usage during email validation, especially when processing complex or long email addresses.

  • Sub-Path 2b: Resource Exhaustion via Large Number of Validation Requests

    • Attack Vector Name: Resource Exhaustion DoS (Volume-Based)
    • Description: Attackers can simply send a large volume of email validation requests, especially with complex or invalid email addresses, to overwhelm the application's resources (CPU, memory, network). This is a general DoS attack, but email validation can be a resource-intensive operation if not handled efficiently.
    • Critical Node: Send a High Volume of Complex or Invalid Email Addresses for Validation
      • Significance: This is the action that triggers the DoS. The attacker exploits the application's reliance on emailvalidator to consume resources by sending a flood of validation requests.
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on email validation requests. Limit the number of requests from a single IP address or user within a given time frame.
        • CAPTCHA or Proof-of-Work: For public-facing endpoints that use email validation (e.g., registration forms), consider using CAPTCHA or proof-of-work mechanisms to deter automated bot attacks.
        • Queueing and Asynchronous Processing: If email validation is resource-intensive, consider offloading validation tasks to a queue and processing them asynchronously to prevent blocking the main application thread.
        • Resource Monitoring and Alerting: Monitor application resource usage (CPU, memory, network) and set up alerts to detect unusual spikes in validation requests or resource consumption.

Attack Tree Path: Dependency Vulnerabilities

3. High-Risk Path: Dependency Vulnerabilities

  • Attack Vector Name: Dependency Vulnerability Exploitation
  • Description: emailvalidator relies on other software libraries (dependencies). If any of these dependencies have known security vulnerabilities, an attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities through the application that uses emailvalidator. This is not a direct vulnerability in emailvalidator itself, but a risk introduced by its dependencies.
  • Critical Node: Identify Vulnerable Dependency of emailvalidator
    • Significance: Identifying a vulnerable dependency is the first and crucial step for this attack path. Once a vulnerable dependency is known, attackers can often find or develop exploits.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Use SCA tools to automatically scan emailvalidator's dependencies for known vulnerabilities. Tools like OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk, or GitHub Dependency Scanning can help.
      • Dependency Management: Maintain a clear inventory of all dependencies used by emailvalidator (and your application).
      • Regular Dependency Updates: Keep emailvalidator and all its dependencies updated to the latest versions. Security patches for vulnerabilities are often released in newer versions. Automate dependency updates where possible, but always test updates in a staging environment before deploying to production.
      • Vulnerability Monitoring and Alerting: Subscribe to security advisories and vulnerability databases related to the programming languages and libraries used in your application stack. Set up alerts to be notified of new vulnerabilities affecting your dependencies.