Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
68 lines (49 loc) · 5.89 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

68 lines (49 loc) · 5.89 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for erusev/parsedown

Mitigation Strategy: 1. Secure Parsedown Configuration

  • Description:

    1. setSafeMode(true): This is the most critical Parsedown-specific setting. It must be set to true during Parsedown initialization. This disables inline HTML and certain potentially dangerous features within Parsedown's parsing logic. It directly affects how Parsedown interprets the input Markdown.
    2. setMarkupEscaped(true): This setting should also be set to true. It instructs Parsedown to escape any HTML markup that is present in the input Markdown. This prevents users from injecting raw HTML by bypassing Markdown syntax. This is a direct instruction to Parsedown on how to handle HTML-like input.
    3. Review setUrlsLinked(): While the default (true) is generally recommended, understanding its function is crucial. If set to false, Parsedown will not automatically create links from URLs. You would then be entirely responsible for handling URL linking, and you would need to implement your own (very careful) logic to avoid XSS. This setting directly controls Parsedown's URL handling behavior.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Severity: Medium: setSafeMode(true) directly mitigates some XSS vectors within Parsedown's parsing. It's not a complete solution, but it's a crucial layer.
    • HTML Injection - Severity: High: setMarkupEscaped(true) directly prevents raw HTML injection as handled by Parsedown.

  • Impact:

    • XSS: Risk reduction: Moderate. It's a necessary, but not sufficient, step. Parsedown's internal handling is improved.
    • HTML Injection: Risk reduction: High (within the scope of what Parsedown processes).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • setSafeMode(true): Implemented in markdown_processing.py.
    • setMarkupEscaped(true): Implemented in markdown_processing.py.
    • setUrlsLinked(): Using the default (true) value, correctly.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • None. All Parsedown configuration settings are currently implemented as recommended.

Mitigation Strategy: 2. ReDoS Awareness and Mitigation (Timeouts within Parsedown Processing)

  • Description:

    1. Timeouts: This is the key Parsedown-specific aspect. Implement a timeout mechanism around the call to Parsedown's parsing function (e.g., Parsedown->text()). If the parsing process takes longer than a predefined threshold (e.g., 2 seconds), terminate the process. This prevents a maliciously crafted input from causing Parsedown to consume excessive resources and potentially freeze the server. This directly limits the execution time of Parsedown.
    2. Input Length Limits: Set reasonable maximum length limits for user input fields.
    3. Regular Expression Auditing: (Advanced, only for high-security needs) Analyze Parsedown's regular expressions for potential vulnerabilities.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) - Severity: Low (for Parsedown itself, higher for custom extensions): A crafted input could, in theory, cause Parsedown's regular expression engine to enter a state of excessive backtracking, leading to high CPU usage and a denial of service.

  • Impact:

    • ReDoS: Risk reduction: Moderate (by limiting the time Parsedown can spend processing).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Input Length Limits: Partially implemented (see Strategy 1 in previous response).
    • Timeouts: Not implemented.
    • Regular Expression Auditing: Not implemented.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Timeouts: This is the crucial missing piece. The code that calls Parsedown->text() (or the equivalent in your language) in markdown_processing.py needs to be wrapped in a timeout mechanism. This might involve using threading, asynchronous processing, or language-specific timeout features.

Mitigation Strategy: 3. Keep Parsedown Updated

  • Description:

    1. Dependency Management: Use a dependency manager (e.g., Composer for PHP, npm for JavaScript) to manage the Parsedown library as a project dependency. This ensures you can easily update it.
    2. Regular Updates: Make it a regular practice (e.g., part of your sprint cycle or monthly maintenance) to update all project dependencies, including Parsedown, to their latest versions.
    3. Automated Scanning: Employ a tool (e.g., Dependabot, Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check) that automatically scans your project's dependencies for known vulnerabilities. These tools will alert you when a new version of Parsedown (or any other dependency) is released that addresses a security issue.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities - Severity: Variable (potentially High): New vulnerabilities in Parsedown could be discovered and exploited before you're aware of them.
    • Known Vulnerabilities - Severity: Variable (depending on the specific vulnerability): Older versions of Parsedown may have publicly disclosed vulnerabilities that attackers could exploit.

  • Impact:

    • Zero-Day/Known Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: High (by ensuring you're running the most secure version of Parsedown).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Dependency Management: Composer is used for PHP dependencies.
    • Regular Updates: Updates are performed manually on a monthly basis.
    • Automated Scanning: Not implemented.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated Scanning: Implement a tool like Dependabot or Snyk to automate the process of scanning for vulnerable dependencies and receiving update notifications. This is crucial for timely patching.