Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
53 lines (43 loc) · 4.14 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

53 lines (43 loc) · 4.14 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for fzaninotto/faker

Objective: Compromise Application Using Faker.js

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Tree: Compromise Application Using Faker.js (High-Risk Paths) └── OR [Achieve Compromise through Faker.js] ├── AND [Exploit Faker.js Functionality Directly] │ └── OR [Exploit Vulnerabilities in Faker.js Dependencies] │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] [3. Dependency Vulnerability Exploitation] [HIGH RISK PATH] └── AND [Misuse of Faker.js in Application Code] └── [CRITICAL NODE] [4. Insecure Usage of Faker.js Output] [HIGH RISK PATH] └── [CRITICAL NODE] [4.1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Faker.js Data] [HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: [CRITICAL NODE] [3. Dependency Vulnerability Exploitation] [HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Vector: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in Faker.js's dependencies (direct or transitive).

  • Details:
    • Faker.js relies on third-party libraries for certain functionalities.
    • These dependencies may contain security vulnerabilities that are publicly known or zero-day.
    • An attacker can identify vulnerable dependencies by:
      • Using vulnerability databases and scanners.
      • Monitoring security advisories related to Faker.js dependencies.
    • Once a vulnerability is identified, the attacker can exploit it to compromise the application.
    • The impact of exploitation depends on the specific vulnerability, but could include:
      • Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the server.
      • Data breaches or unauthorized access.
      • Denial of Service (DoS).
  • Example Scenario: A dependency used by Faker.js for date formatting has a known RCE vulnerability. An attacker crafts a malicious input that, when processed by Faker.js and its vulnerable dependency, executes arbitrary code on the application server.

Attack Tree Path: [CRITICAL NODE] [4. Insecure Usage of Faker.js Output] [HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Vector: Exploiting the application's insecure handling of data generated by Faker.js.

  • Details:
    • Even if Faker.js itself is secure, the application's code might introduce vulnerabilities when using Faker.js output.
    • This occurs when developers blindly trust Faker.js generated data and use it without proper sanitization or encoding in security-sensitive contexts.
    • The most common and critical instance of this is Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).

Attack Tree Path: [CRITICAL NODE] [4.1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Faker.js Data] [HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Vector: Injecting malicious scripts into web pages by exploiting the application's failure to properly encode Faker.js generated data before rendering it in HTML.

  • Details:
    • Faker.js can generate data that includes characters with special meaning in HTML (e.g., <, >, ").
    • If this data is directly inserted into HTML content without proper encoding (e.g., HTML entity encoding), these special characters can be interpreted as HTML tags or JavaScript code.
    • An attacker can craft inputs or manipulate data flow to ensure Faker.js generates data that, when rendered, executes malicious JavaScript in the user's browser.
    • This can lead to:
      • Session hijacking and account compromise.
      • Data theft and exfiltration.
      • Website defacement and redirection to malicious sites.
      • Malware distribution.
  • Example Scenario: An application uses faker.name.firstName() to display user names on a profile page. If the application does not HTML-encode the output, an attacker could manipulate their profile data (or data used to generate fake profiles) to include a malicious script within their "first name" using Faker.js data generation flow. When another user views the profile page, the malicious script executes in their browser.