Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
40 lines (33 loc) · 4.14 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

40 lines (33 loc) · 4.14 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for fzaninotto/faker

Attack Surface: Predictable Data Generation for Security-Sensitive Purposes

  • Description: Using faker to generate data that is intended to be secret or unpredictable, such as tokens, keys, or passwords.
  • How faker Contributes: faker is designed for generating realistic-looking data, not cryptographically secure data. Its default seeding or predictable seeds make the output guessable.
  • Example: A password reset feature uses faker.password() to generate the reset token, and the application uses a default or easily guessable seed.
  • Impact: An attacker can predict the generated tokens/keys/passwords and gain unauthorized access to accounts or resources.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Never use faker for generating security-sensitive data in production.
    • Use cryptographically secure random number generators (CSRNGs) like Python's secrets module for tokens, keys, and passwords.
    • If faker is used in a non-production, publicly accessible environment (strongly discouraged), ensure a truly random, unpredictable, and non-reusable seed is used for each generation. This is still a high-risk practice.

Attack Surface: Indirect Code Injection (via Unsafe Usage of faker Output)

  • Description: Using faker-generated data in an unsafe way that allows for code injection (SQL injection, XSS, etc.). This is not a vulnerability in faker itself, but a misuse of its output. However, faker's role in providing the potentially malicious input is direct.
  • How faker Contributes: faker generates strings, and if these strings are not properly sanitized, they could contain malicious code if used in vulnerable contexts.
  • Example: Using faker.text() to generate a "username" and then directly inserting that username into an SQL query without proper sanitization or using parameterized queries.
  • Impact: Code execution on the server or in the user's browser, leading to data breaches, system compromise, or other severe consequences.
  • Risk Severity: Critical (if exploitable)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Always sanitize and validate all data, including faker-generated data, before using it in any context where it could be interpreted as code.
    • Use parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions.
    • Use appropriate output encoding and escaping (e.g., HTML escaping) when rendering data in web pages or other user interfaces.
    • Avoid using eval() or similar functions with untrusted data.

Attack Surface: Unintentional PII Generation and Storage

  • Description: faker accidentally generates data that resembles real PII, and this data is stored or processed as if it were real.
  • How faker Contributes: While designed for fake data, faker can, by chance, create combinations that match real-world PII.
  • Example: faker generates a name, address, and phone number combination that coincidentally matches a real person. This data is then stored in a production database.
  • Impact: Potential privacy violations, legal issues, and reputational damage if the synthetic PII is mistaken for real PII and mishandled.
  • Risk Severity: High (depending on data handling practices and jurisdiction)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Avoid storing faker-generated data persistently in production databases.
    • If persistent storage is absolutely necessary (e.g., for long-term testing), clearly mark the data as synthetic (e.g., with a dedicated flag or separate table).
    • Implement data handling procedures that prevent synthetic data from being treated as real PII (e.g., data masking, access controls).
    • Consider using faker providers that are less likely to generate realistic PII (e.g., avoid providers for real addresses or phone numbers if not strictly necessary).