Okay, let's create a design document for the Grav CMS project, focusing on aspects relevant to threat modeling.
Grav is a flat-file content management system (CMS). It's designed to be fast, simple, and flexible, appealing to users who want a lightweight alternative to database-driven CMSs like WordPress or Drupal. The business priorities likely revolve around:
- Ease of Use: Attracting users with a simple installation and management process.
- Performance: Providing a fast website experience, leveraging its flat-file architecture.
- Extensibility: Allowing users to customize and extend functionality through plugins and themes.
- Community: Fostering a strong community for support, development, and contribution.
- Reputation: Maintaining a reputation for being secure, reliable, and well-maintained.
Based on these priorities, the most important business risks are:
- Security Vulnerabilities: Exploitable vulnerabilities in the core CMS, plugins, or themes could lead to website defacement, data breaches, or complete site takeover. This is a critical risk given the public-facing nature of websites.
- Performance Degradation: Poorly written plugins, themes, or excessive content could negatively impact website performance, driving users away.
- Lack of Adoption: If Grav fails to attract and retain users, its long-term viability is threatened.
- Reputational Damage: Security incidents or negative user experiences could damage Grav's reputation, hindering adoption and community growth.
- Supply Chain Attacks: Compromise of third-party libraries or build processes could introduce vulnerabilities.
Grav, being a self-hosted CMS, has a security posture that heavily relies on the user's implementation and the inherent security of the platform itself.
Existing Security Controls (based on the GitHub repository and general knowledge of flat-file CMSs):
- security control: Input Validation: Grav likely employs input validation to sanitize user-provided data before processing or storing it, mitigating risks like Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and code injection. Implemented in core code and recommended for plugin/theme developers.
- security control: Configuration Hardening: Grav provides configuration options to enhance security, such as disabling unnecessary features or restricting access to sensitive files. Described in documentation and configuration files.
- security control: Regular Updates: The Grav team releases updates to address security vulnerabilities and improve functionality. This relies on users actively updating their installations. Described in release notes and update mechanisms.
- security control: Plugin/Theme Vetting (Limited): While there's a plugin/theme ecosystem, the level of vetting before inclusion may vary. Users should exercise caution when installing third-party extensions. Described in plugin/theme repository guidelines.
- security control: File Permissions: Proper file permissions on the server are crucial for preventing unauthorized access. This is primarily the responsibility of the user during installation and maintenance. Described in installation documentation.
- security control: .htaccess (Apache): Grav utilizes .htaccess files (on Apache servers) to configure security settings like directory listing prevention and access control. Described in default .htaccess files.
- security control: YAML Configuration: Uses YAML files for configuration, which are less prone to injection vulnerabilities compared to executable configuration files. Implemented in core code.
Accepted Risks:
- accepted risk: User Responsibility: A significant portion of the security responsibility rests with the user, including server configuration, plugin/theme selection, and regular updates.
- accepted risk: Third-Party Plugin/Theme Risk: While the core Grav system might be secure, vulnerabilities in third-party plugins or themes can compromise the entire site.
- accepted risk: Limited Built-in Protections: Compared to some enterprise-grade CMSs, Grav may have fewer built-in security features like Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs).
Recommended Security Controls:
- security control: Security Audits: Regular security audits (both manual code review and automated scanning) of the core Grav code and popular plugins/themes.
- security control: Content Security Policy (CSP): Implementing CSP headers to mitigate XSS and other code injection attacks.
- security control: Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Offering 2FA for administrative accounts to enhance login security.
- security control: Security Headers: Enforcing the use of security-related HTTP headers (e.g., HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options).
- security control: Automated Security Scanning: Integrating automated security scanning tools into the development and release process.
Security Requirements:
- Authentication:
- Secure password storage using strong hashing algorithms (e.g., bcrypt, Argon2).
- Protection against brute-force attacks (e.g., rate limiting, account lockout).
- Optional support for multi-factor authentication.
- Authorization:
- Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to manage user permissions.
- Clear separation of privileges between different user roles (e.g., administrator, editor, contributor).
- Secure handling of user sessions.
- Input Validation:
- Strict validation of all user-provided input, including form data, URL parameters, and file uploads.
- Whitelist-based validation where possible, rather than blacklist-based.
- Output encoding to prevent XSS vulnerabilities.
- Cryptography:
- Use of strong, industry-standard cryptographic algorithms for sensitive data (e.g., passwords, API keys).
- Secure generation and management of cryptographic keys.
- Avoidance of deprecated or weak cryptographic algorithms.
graph LR
subgraph "Internet"
A[User]
end
B[Grav CMS]
C[Web Server]
D[File System]
E[Admin User]
A -- "Visits website" --> B
E -- "Manages content" --> B
B -- "Serves content" --> C
C -- "Reads/Writes files" --> D
Context Diagram Element List:
-
Element:
- Name: User
- Type: Person
- Description: A person who visits the website hosted by Grav CMS.
- Responsibilities: Browses website content, interacts with forms (if any).
- Security controls: Browser security settings, safe browsing practices.
-
Element:
- Name: Admin User
- Type: Person
- Description: A person who manages the content and configuration of the Grav CMS.
- Responsibilities: Creates, edits, and deletes content; manages users; installs plugins and themes; configures the CMS.
- Security controls: Strong passwords, secure network connection, potentially 2FA.
-
Element:
- Name: Grav CMS
- Type: Software System
- Description: The flat-file content management system.
- Responsibilities: Processes user requests, retrieves content from the file system, renders web pages, manages users and plugins.
- Security controls: Input validation, output encoding, secure configuration, regular updates.
-
Element:
- Name: Web Server
- Type: Software System
- Description: The web server software (e.g., Apache, Nginx) that hosts the Grav CMS.
- Responsibilities: Receives HTTP requests, serves static files, executes PHP scripts.
- Security controls: Secure configuration, regular updates, file permissions, potentially a WAF.
-
Element:
- Name: File System
- Type: System
- Description: The file system of the server where Grav CMS files (content, configuration, plugins, themes) are stored.
- Responsibilities: Stores and retrieves files.
- Security controls: File permissions, operating system security, potentially disk encryption.
graph LR
subgraph "Grav CMS"
A[Web Server Interface]
B[Grav Core]
C[Plugin System]
D[Theme System]
E[Admin Panel]
F[Cache]
A -- "HTTP Requests" --> B
B -- "Loads plugins" --> C
B -- "Loads themes" --> D
B -- "Manages content" --> E
B -- "Reads/Writes" --> F
end
Container Diagram Element List:
-
Element:
- Name: Web Server Interface
- Type: Component
- Description: The interface between the web server and Grav (e.g., PHP-FPM, mod_php).
- Responsibilities: Handles incoming HTTP requests and passes them to Grav Core.
- Security controls: Secure configuration of the web server and PHP.
-
Element:
- Name: Grav Core
- Type: Component
- Description: The core functionality of the Grav CMS.
- Responsibilities: Routing, content processing, template rendering, user management, plugin/theme loading.
- Security controls: Input validation, output encoding, secure coding practices.
-
Element:
- Name: Plugin System
- Type: Component
- Description: The system for managing and loading plugins.
- Responsibilities: Loads and executes plugins, provides APIs for plugins to interact with Grav Core.
- Security controls: Plugin vetting (limited), sandboxing (ideally).
-
Element:
- Name: Theme System
- Type: Component
- Description: The system for managing and loading themes.
- Responsibilities: Loads and applies themes, provides templating engine.
- Security controls: Theme vetting (limited), secure template design.
-
Element:
- Name: Admin Panel
- Type: Component
- Description: The web-based interface for managing Grav.
- Responsibilities: Provides UI for content management, user management, configuration, etc.
- Security controls: Authentication, authorization, input validation, session management.
-
Element:
- Name: Cache
- Type: Component
- Description: Caching system to improve performance.
- Responsibilities: Stores and retrieves cached data.
- Security controls: Secure cache configuration, cache invalidation mechanisms.
Possible Deployment Solutions:
- Traditional Web Hosting: Deploying Grav on a shared or dedicated web hosting account with a provider like Bluehost, SiteGround, etc.
- Virtual Private Server (VPS): Deploying Grav on a VPS like DigitalOcean, Linode, or AWS Lightsail.
- Cloud Platform (PaaS): Deploying Grav on a Platform-as-a-Service provider like Heroku or Google App Engine.
- Containerized Deployment: Deploying Grav using Docker and a container orchestration platform like Kubernetes.
Chosen Solution (for detailed description): VPS (e.g., DigitalOcean Droplet)
graph LR
subgraph "DigitalOcean"
A[Droplet (VPS)]
B[Ubuntu Server]
C[Nginx]
D[PHP-FPM]
E[Grav Files]
A -- "Runs" --> B
B -- "Runs" --> C
B -- "Runs" --> D
D -- "Accesses" --> E
end
Deployment Diagram Element List:
-
Element:
- Name: Droplet (VPS)
- Type: Infrastructure
- Description: A virtual private server instance on DigitalOcean.
- Responsibilities: Provides the computing resources for running the Grav CMS.
- Security controls: Firewall, SSH key authentication, regular system updates.
-
Element:
- Name: Ubuntu Server
- Type: Operating System
- Description: The operating system running on the VPS.
- Responsibilities: Manages system resources, runs software.
- Security controls: Regular security updates, user account management, firewall configuration.
-
Element:
- Name: Nginx
- Type: Web Server
- Description: The web server software.
- Responsibilities: Serves static files, proxies requests to PHP-FPM.
- Security controls: Secure configuration, regular updates, potentially a WAF.
-
Element:
- Name: PHP-FPM
- Type: Process Manager
- Description: The FastCGI Process Manager for PHP.
- Responsibilities: Executes PHP scripts.
- Security controls: Secure configuration, regular updates, resource limits.
-
Element:
- Name: Grav Files
- Type: Files
- Description: The Grav CMS files (core, plugins, themes, content).
- Responsibilities: Stores the website data.
- Security controls: File permissions, regular backups.
Grav's build process is relatively simple, as it's primarily a collection of PHP files and doesn't require compilation in the traditional sense. However, there are still build-related aspects to consider, particularly for releases and development.
graph LR
A[Developer Workstation]
B[GitHub Repository]
C[GitHub Actions]
D[Release Artifacts]
E[Composer]
A -- "Commits code" --> B
B -- "Triggers build" --> C
C -- "Runs tests" --> C
C -- "Runs linters" --> C
C -- "Manages dependencies" --> E
C -- "Creates release" --> D
Build Process Description:
- Development: Developers work on the Grav core, plugins, and themes locally.
- Version Control: Code is managed using Git and hosted on GitHub.
- Dependency Management: Composer is used to manage PHP dependencies.
- Automated Builds (GitHub Actions): GitHub Actions is used to automate tasks like:
- Running unit tests.
- Running code linters (e.g., PHP_CodeSniffer).
- Managing dependencies with Composer.
- Creating release artifacts (zip files).
- Release: When a new version is tagged, GitHub Actions creates a release artifact (a zip file containing the Grav files) and publishes it on GitHub.
Security Controls in Build Process:
- security control: Code Review: Pull requests are used to review code changes before merging them into the main branch.
- security control: Automated Testing: Unit tests help ensure code quality and prevent regressions.
- security control: Code Linting: Linters enforce coding standards and help identify potential security issues.
- security control: Dependency Management: Composer helps manage dependencies and ensures that known vulnerable versions are not used (with proper configuration and updates).
- security control: GitHub Actions Security: Using a secure CI/CD environment like GitHub Actions, with appropriate permissions and secrets management.
Critical Business Processes:
- Website Availability: Ensuring the website is accessible to users.
- Content Management: Allowing authorized users to create, edit, and publish content.
- User Authentication: Securely authenticating users and managing their access.
- Plugin/Theme Management: Allowing users to extend functionality through plugins and themes.
Data to Protect:
- Website Content (Low to Medium Sensitivity): The actual content of the website, which may include text, images, and other media. The sensitivity depends on the nature of the website.
- User Data (Medium to High Sensitivity): Usernames, hashed passwords, email addresses, and potentially other personal information.
- Configuration Data (Medium Sensitivity): Configuration files containing settings, API keys, and potentially other sensitive information.
- System Files (High Sensitivity): Core Grav files, plugin files, and theme files. Compromise of these files could lead to complete site takeover.
Questions:
- What is the specific threat model that Grav uses (if any)?
- What are the plans for implementing more robust security features like 2FA and CSP?
- What is the process for reporting and handling security vulnerabilities?
- How are plugins and themes vetted for security before being listed in the official repository?
- What level of support is provided for security-related issues?
Assumptions:
- BUSINESS POSTURE: Assumes that Grav's primary target audience is individuals and small businesses who prioritize ease of use and performance over enterprise-grade security features.
- SECURITY POSTURE: Assumes that users are responsible for securing their own server environment and keeping Grav and its components updated.
- DESIGN: Assumes a standard LAMP/LEMP stack deployment, although other configurations are possible. Assumes that GitHub Actions is the primary CI/CD pipeline.