Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
150 lines (110 loc) · 13.6 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

150 lines (110 loc) · 13.6 KB

Deep Analysis of Security Considerations for sentry-php SDK

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security assessment of the sentry-php SDK, focusing on its key components, architecture, data flow, and interactions with the Sentry service. The analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to the SDK's design and functionality. We will pay particular attention to data handling, authentication, and the use of third-party libraries.

Scope:

This analysis covers the sentry-php SDK as described in the provided security design review and available information on the GitHub repository (https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-php). It includes:

  • The SDK's core components (Error Handler, Event Handler, Transport, Options).
  • The SDK's interaction with the Sentry service.
  • The SDK's build and deployment processes.
  • The SDK's handling of sensitive data.
  • Dependencies on third-party libraries.

The analysis excludes the security of the Sentry service itself, as it is considered an external system. However, the interaction between the SDK and the Sentry service is within scope.

Methodology:

  1. Code Review and Documentation Analysis: We will analyze the provided security design review, inferring architecture and data flow from the C4 diagrams and descriptions. We will supplement this with information from the GitHub repository, including the SECURITY.md file, composer.json, CI configuration, and any relevant documentation.
  2. Threat Modeling: We will identify potential threats based on the SDK's functionality, data flows, and interactions with external systems. We will consider common attack vectors, such as injection, data breaches, and denial-of-service.
  3. Vulnerability Assessment: We will assess the likelihood and impact of identified threats, considering existing security controls and accepted risks.
  4. Mitigation Recommendations: We will propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies to address identified vulnerabilities, focusing on practical steps that can be implemented within the SDK's development process.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the C4 Container diagram and descriptions, we analyze the security implications of each key component:

  • Error Handler:

    • Functionality: Registers as the default error and exception handler in the PHP application, capturing unhandled errors and exceptions.
    • Security Implications:
      • Injection: If error messages or stack traces contain unsanitized user input, this could be propagated to Sentry, potentially leading to cross-site scripting (XSS) or other injection vulnerabilities within the Sentry UI (although this is primarily Sentry's responsibility to mitigate). More critically, if the error handler itself has vulnerabilities, it could be exploited to hijack control flow.
      • Data Exposure: Error messages and stack traces may inadvertently contain sensitive data (e.g., API keys, database credentials, PII).
      • Resource Exhaustion: A malicious actor could trigger a large number of errors, potentially overwhelming the error handler and impacting application performance.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Input Validation (Limited): While the Error Handler primarily receives data from the PHP runtime, any user-provided data within error messages should be treated with caution. Focus on preventing the Error Handler itself from being vulnerable to injection.
      • Data Sanitization/Filtering: Implement robust filtering mechanisms to remove or redact sensitive data from error messages and stack traces before they are passed to the Event Handler. This is crucial. Consider using a configurable allowlist/denylist approach.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting within the Error Handler to prevent an excessive number of errors from being processed, mitigating resource exhaustion attacks.

  • Event Handler:

    • Functionality: Processes captured errors, creates Event objects, adds contextual data, applies before-send callbacks, and filters events.
    • Security Implications:
      • Data Manipulation: Before-send callbacks could be abused to modify event data maliciously, potentially injecting harmful content or removing crucial information.
      • Data Exposure: Contextual data added by the Event Handler (e.g., user information, request headers) could contain sensitive information.
      • Logic Errors: Bugs in the event filtering or processing logic could lead to incorrect data being sent to Sentry or events being dropped unintentionally.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Secure Callback Handling: If before-send callbacks are provided by the user, implement strict validation and sandboxing to prevent malicious code execution. Consider limiting the capabilities of these callbacks. Ideally, avoid allowing arbitrary user-defined code execution in callbacks.
      • Data Sanitization: Apply consistent data sanitization and filtering to all contextual data added to the Event object, similar to the Error Handler. Ensure that user-provided data is properly escaped or encoded.
      • Thorough Testing: Extensive unit and integration testing are crucial to ensure the correctness of the event processing and filtering logic.

  • Transport:

    • Functionality: Sends events to the Sentry service over HTTP(S).
    • Security Implications:
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks: If communication is not secured with HTTPS, an attacker could intercept and modify event data.
      • Authentication Failure: Incorrect handling of the DSN (API key) could lead to unauthorized access to the Sentry service.
      • Denial-of-Service (DoS): A large number of events could overwhelm the transport mechanism or the Sentry service.
      • Data Exfiltration: If the DSN is compromised, an attacker could redirect events to a malicious server.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Mandatory HTTPS: Enforce the use of HTTPS for all communication with the Sentry service. Reject any attempts to use plain HTTP. Validate the Sentry server's TLS certificate.
      • Secure DSN Handling: The DSN must be treated as a highly sensitive secret. Provide clear documentation and examples on how to securely store and configure the DSN (e.g., using environment variables, a secure configuration file, or a secrets management system). Never hardcode the DSN in the application code.
      • Rate Limiting/Queueing: Implement rate limiting or queueing mechanisms to prevent overwhelming the Sentry service. Consider using a robust queueing system for asynchronous transport.
      • DSN Validation: Validate the format and structure of the DSN before using it. This can help prevent some types of injection attacks.

  • Options:

    • Functionality: Stores and provides access to SDK configuration options.
    • Security Implications:
      • DSN Exposure: Improper storage or access control to the Options object could lead to the DSN being leaked.
      • Configuration Tampering: If an attacker can modify the SDK's configuration, they could potentially disable error reporting, change the DSN, or alter other settings.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Secure Storage: Store the DSN securely, using environment variables, a secure configuration file with appropriate permissions, or a dedicated secrets management system.
      • Access Control: Limit access to the Options object and its sensitive data. Ensure that only authorized code can modify the configuration.
      • Input Validation: Validate all configuration options to prevent unexpected values from being used.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

The C4 diagrams and descriptions provide a good overview of the architecture. Here's a summary of the inferred data flow:

  1. Error Occurs: An unhandled error or exception occurs in the PHP application.
  2. Error Handler Captures: The registered Error Handler captures the error/exception details.
  3. Event Creation: The Error Handler creates an initial Event object containing basic error information.
  4. Event Handler Processing: The Event Handler enriches the Event object with contextual data (environment, user, request, etc.). It applies any configured before-send callbacks and filters.
  5. Transport Transmission: The Transport component takes the processed Event object and sends it to the Sentry service via an HTTPS request, authenticated with the DSN.
  6. Sentry Service Processing: The Sentry service receives the event, processes it, and stores it for later analysis.

4. Specific Security Considerations for sentry-php

Based on the analysis, here are specific security considerations for the sentry-php SDK:

  • Data Minimization: Collect only the necessary data to diagnose errors. Avoid collecting unnecessary PII or sensitive information by default. Provide clear configuration options for developers to control the level of data collection.
  • Data Masking/Redaction: Implement robust data masking and redaction capabilities to automatically remove sensitive information (e.g., passwords, API keys, credit card numbers) from error messages, stack traces, and contextual data. This should be configurable and extensible.
  • DSN Rotation: Provide guidance and potentially helper functions to facilitate DSN rotation. Regular DSN rotation is a good security practice.
  • Dependency Security: Regularly audit and update third-party dependencies using SCA tools (as recommended in the security design review). Address any identified vulnerabilities promptly. Consider using tools like Dependabot to automate this process.
  • Secure Coding Practices: Adhere to secure coding practices throughout the SDK's codebase. Avoid common vulnerabilities like injection flaws, insecure deserialization, and improper error handling.
  • Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits, both internal and external, to identify and address potential vulnerabilities.
  • Transparency: Be transparent about the SDK's security practices and any known limitations. Provide clear documentation on how to securely configure and use the SDK.
  • Asynchronous Transport: If implementing asynchronous transport, ensure the queueing mechanism is secure and reliable. Consider using a well-vetted queueing system (e.g., Redis, RabbitMQ) and implement appropriate security controls (e.g., authentication, encryption).
  • PHP Version Support: Clearly define and document the supported PHP versions. Drop support for end-of-life PHP versions promptly to avoid security risks associated with outdated software.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

Here's a summary of actionable mitigation strategies, categorized for clarity:

Data Handling:

  • MUST: Implement a robust data filtering/redaction mechanism to remove sensitive data from error reports before sending them to Sentry. This should be configurable and extensible, allowing developers to define custom redaction rules.
  • MUST: Provide clear documentation and examples on how to configure data collection and redaction to minimize the risk of sending sensitive data.
  • SHOULD: Implement data minimization principles by default. Only collect essential data unless explicitly configured otherwise.
  • SHOULD: Provide options for developers to encrypt sensitive data before sending it to Sentry (e.g., encrypting user data).

Authentication and Authorization:

  • MUST: Enforce HTTPS for all communication with the Sentry service.
  • MUST: Provide clear guidance and examples on how to securely store and configure the DSN (e.g., using environment variables).
  • MUST: Validate the DSN format before use.
  • SHOULD: Provide guidance and helper functions for DSN rotation.

Code Security:

  • MUST: Continue using static analysis tools (Psalm, PHPStan) and address any identified issues.
  • MUST: Maintain a comprehensive suite of unit and integration tests.
  • MUST: Adhere to secure coding practices to prevent common vulnerabilities.
  • SHOULD: Implement DAST scans to identify runtime vulnerabilities.
  • SHOULD: Integrate SCA tools to automatically identify and track vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies.
  • SHOULD: Conduct regular security audits.

Error and Event Handling:

  • MUST: Implement rate limiting in the Error Handler to prevent resource exhaustion.
  • SHOULD: If user-defined callbacks are allowed, implement strict validation and sandboxing.
  • SHOULD: Thoroughly test the event processing and filtering logic.

Deployment and Build:

  • MUST: Continue using Composer for dependency management and ensure dependencies are regularly updated.
  • MUST: Maintain a secure CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions).

Other:

  • MUST: Clearly document supported PHP versions and drop support for EOL versions.
  • SHOULD: Provide clear and transparent security documentation.
  • SHOULD: If implementing asynchronous transport, ensure the queueing mechanism is secure and reliable.

By implementing these mitigation strategies, the sentry-php SDK can significantly improve its security posture and reduce the risk of vulnerabilities that could impact the applications that use it. The most critical areas to focus on are data sanitization/redaction, secure DSN handling, and dependency management.