Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
49 lines (40 loc) · 3.88 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

49 lines (40 loc) · 3.88 KB

Threat Model Analysis for intervention/image

Threat: Image Parsing Vulnerability - Remote Code Execution (RCE)

  • Description: An attacker uploads a maliciously crafted image file (e.g., PNG, JPEG, GIF) designed to exploit a vulnerability in the underlying image decoding library (GD Library or Imagick). Processing this image with intervention/image triggers the vulnerability, allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.
  • Impact: Critical. Full server compromise, data breaches, service disruption.
  • Affected Component: Underlying Image Decoding Libraries (GD Library or Imagick).
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep GD Library/Imagick Up-to-Date.
    • Input Validation (File Extension & MIME Type Whitelisting).
    • Sandboxing for image processing.
    • Web Application Firewall (WAF).

Threat: Image Parsing Vulnerability - Denial of Service (DoS)

  • Description: An attacker uploads a specially crafted image file that, when processed by intervention/image, consumes excessive server resources (CPU, memory, disk I/O). Repeated processing requests of such images can overload the server, causing service outage.
  • Impact: High. Application unavailability, service disruption.
  • Affected Component: Underlying Image Decoding Libraries (GD Library or Imagick), intervention/image processing functions.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Resource Limits (Timeouts, Memory Limits).
    • Image Size Limits (File Size & Dimensions).
    • Rate Limiting for image processing.
    • Asynchronous Processing for image tasks.

Threat: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via External Image Fetching (If Implemented)

  • Description: If the application uses intervention/image to fetch images from external URLs based on user input, an attacker could manipulate this input to point to internal network resources. The server, using intervention/image to fetch and process the "image", would make requests to these internal resources, potentially exposing sensitive information or allowing access to internal services.
  • Impact: High. Information disclosure, access to internal services, potential for further exploitation of internal systems.
  • Affected Component: Application code using intervention/image for external image fetching, network layer.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Avoid fetching external images based on user input if possible.
    • Input Sanitization and Validation (URL Whitelisting) if external fetching is necessary.
    • Network Segmentation to isolate application server.
    • Disable URL fetching features if not required.

Threat: Dependency Vulnerability in GD/Imagick (Known Vulnerabilities)

  • Description: GD Library or Imagick may contain known security vulnerabilities. If outdated versions are used, attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities through intervention/image by crafting specific images or triggering vulnerable code paths during image processing.
  • Impact: Critical to High. Impact depends on the specific vulnerability, ranging from RCE and DoS to information disclosure.
  • Affected Component: Underlying Image Decoding Libraries (GD Library or Imagick).
  • Risk Severity: Critical to High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regularly Update GD/Imagick to the latest versions.
    • Vulnerability Scanning for dependencies (GD/Imagick).
    • Choose the Right Driver (GD vs Imagick) considering security implications.