Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
96 lines (78 loc) · 7.01 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

96 lines (78 loc) · 7.01 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for intervention/image

Objective: To achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the application server by exploiting vulnerabilities in the Intervention/Image library or its dependencies.

Attack Tree Visualization

                                      Attacker's Goal:
                                  Compromise Application (RCE)
                                              |
                                      1. Achieve RCE [CRITICAL]
                                              |
                      -------------------------------------------------
                      |                                               |
              1.1 Exploit ImageMagick/                  1.2 Exploit Intervention/
              GD Vuln. [CRITICAL]                      Image Logic Flaws
                      |                                               |
              -----------------                       -----------------
              |               |                       |               |
        1.1.1 Image     -> HIGH RISK -> 1.1.2 Image     1.2.1 Unsafe    -> HIGH RISK -> 1.2.2 Image
        Tragick         Shell Command Injection         File            Type Change
        Exploit         [CRITICAL]                      Handling        [CRITICAL]
        [CRITICAL]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Achieve RCE [CRITICAL]

  • Description: This is the primary objective of the attacker. Remote Code Execution allows the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the server, effectively gaining full control.
  • Impact: Very High - Complete system compromise.
  • Mitigation Focus: All mitigations related to preventing RCE are critical.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1 Exploit ImageMagick/GD Vuln. [CRITICAL]

  • Description: This node represents exploiting known vulnerabilities in the underlying image processing libraries, ImageMagick or GD. These libraries are often targeted due to their complexity and widespread use.
  • Impact: Very High - Leads directly to RCE.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Keep ImageMagick and GD updated to the latest versions.
    • Use a vulnerability scanner to identify outdated components.
    • Configure ImageMagick's policy.xml to restrict resources and disable dangerous features.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1 ImageTragick Exploit [CRITICAL]

  • Description: A specific set of vulnerabilities in ImageMagick (e.g., CVE-2016-3714) that allow RCE through specially crafted image files. These vulnerabilities are well-known and have publicly available exploits.
  • Impact: Very High - Direct RCE.
  • Likelihood (if unpatched): High.
  • Effort: Very Low - Public exploits are readily available.
  • Skill Level: Script Kiddie.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy - Signature-based detection is possible.
  • Mitigation:
    • Ensure ImageMagick is updated to a version that patches ImageTragick vulnerabilities.
    • Use a WAF with rules to detect and block ImageTragick exploits.

Attack Tree Path: -> HIGH RISK -> 1.1.2 Image Shell Command Injection [CRITICAL]

  • Description: This attack occurs when the application passes unsanitized user-supplied data (e.g., filenames, image parameters) to ImageMagick or GD functions. The attacker can inject shell commands into these parameters, which are then executed by the server.
  • Impact: Very High - Direct RCE.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Depends on the application's input handling.
  • Effort: Medium - Requires crafting malicious input.
  • Skill Level: Intermediate.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Can be detected by IDS/SIEM, but sophisticated attackers might try to evade detection.
  • Mitigation:
    • Strict Input Sanitization: Thoroughly sanitize all user-supplied data before passing it to ImageMagick/GD functions. Use a well-vetted sanitization library and a whitelist approach where possible. Do not rely on blacklisting.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure the web server and image processing processes run with the minimum necessary privileges.
    • Input Validation: Validate the type and content of user input, not just the format.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2 Exploit Intervention/Image Logic Flaws

  • Description: This represents vulnerabilities within the Intervention/Image library's code itself, rather than in its dependencies.
  • Impact: High - Could lead to RCE or other significant compromises.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Regular security audits of the Intervention/Image library.
    • Keep the library updated.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2.1 Unsafe File Handling

  • Description: If the library doesn't properly sanitize filenames or paths, an attacker might be able to write files to arbitrary locations.
  • Impact: High.
  • Likelihood: Low.
  • Mitigation:
    • Sanitize filenames and paths.
    • Use a well-vetted sanitization library.

Attack Tree Path: -> HIGH RISK -> 1.2.2 Image Type Change [CRITICAL]

  • Description: This attack exploits a common application-level vulnerability: insufficient image type verification. The attacker uploads a malicious file (e.g., a PHP script) disguised as an image (e.g., with a .jpg extension). If the application relies solely on the file extension and doesn't verify the actual content, the server might execute the malicious script.
  • Impact: Very High - Direct RCE.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Depends on the application's image type handling.
  • Effort: Medium - Requires crafting a malicious file and bypassing extension checks.
  • Skill Level: Intermediate.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Can be detected by file integrity monitoring and web application firewalls.
  • Mitigation:
    • Content-Based Type Verification: Never rely solely on the file extension to determine the file type. Use Intervention/Image's mime() method (which uses finfo_buffer or mime_content_type internally) or a similar robust method to determine the actual content type based on the file's contents, not its extension.
    • Whitelist Allowed Types: Maintain a whitelist of allowed image MIME types (e.g., image/jpeg, image/png, image/gif) and reject any files that don't match.
    • Store Uploaded Files Outside the Web Root: Store uploaded files in a directory that is not directly accessible via the web server. Serve the images through a script that performs additional checks.
    • Rename Uploaded Files: Rename uploaded files to randomly generated names to prevent attackers from guessing the file path and directly accessing the uploaded file.