Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
61 lines (36 loc) · 5.09 KB

File metadata and controls

61 lines (36 loc) · 5.09 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for laminas/laminas-mvc

Description: Attackers manipulating route parameters (defined within Laminas's routing configuration) to access unauthorized resources or inject malicious data. This is a direct consequence of how Laminas-MVC handles routing.

How Laminas-MVC Contributes: Laminas MVC's routing system heavily relies on parameters extracted from the URL. The framework provides the mechanism for defining and extracting these parameters, making it a central point for this attack vector. The vulnerability arises when these parameters are not validated within the controller.

Example: A route /product/:id where :id is directly used in a database query without sanitization: /product/1;DROP TABLE products. Or, /download/:file allowing directory traversal: /download/../../etc/passwd due to missing validation.

Impact: Information disclosure, data modification, potential for remote code execution (RCE) in extreme cases.

Risk Severity: Critical

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Mandatory Input Validation: Always validate and sanitize all route parameters within the controller action using Laminas\InputFilter. This is the primary defense.
  • Parameterized Queries: Use parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions, never concatenating user-supplied data.
  • Whitelist Validation: Use whitelisting to define allowed parameter values, rather than attempting to blacklist "bad" values.
  • File Path Sanitization (if applicable): If parameters are used in file system operations, rigorously sanitize them to prevent directory traversal. Use functions like realpath() and basename() and avoid direct user input in file paths.

Description: Misconfiguring services within the Laminas Service Manager, leading to insecure dependencies or exposed sensitive data. This is directly tied to Laminas-MVC's dependency injection system.

How Laminas-MVC Contributes: Laminas MVC relies entirely on the Service Manager for managing application components and dependencies. The configuration of the Service Manager is the configuration of the application's core services.

Example: Storing database credentials in plain text within config/autoload/local.php (which might be accidentally committed to version control). Or, configuring a service to use an insecure connection (HTTP instead of HTTPS).

Impact: Information disclosure (e.g., database credentials), potential for man-in-the-middle attacks, compromise of dependent services.

Risk Severity: High

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Secure Configuration Storage: Never store sensitive data in configuration files checked into version control. Use environment variables or a dedicated secrets management solution.
  • Configuration Auditing: Regularly review and audit all Service Manager configurations.
  • Principle of Least Privilege: Configure services with the minimum necessary privileges.
  • Secure Connections: Enforce secure connections (HTTPS, TLS) for all inter-service communication.
  • Factory Validation: Use factories to create services, and within the factories, validate and sanitize configuration values and dependencies before using them.

Description: Failure to use or incorrect use of Laminas's InputFilter and form validation capabilities, leading to vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injection.

How Laminas-MVC Contributes: While Laminas provides the InputFilter and form validation components, it's the developer's responsibility to implement them. The framework itself doesn't automatically enforce validation; it's a tool that must be used correctly. The close integration of forms and InputFilter with the MVC workflow makes this a Laminas-MVC specific concern.

Example: A form submission processed by a controller action that directly uses $this->params()->fromPost('some_field') without any validation, leading to SQL injection if some_field is used in a database query.

Impact: Allows various attacks, including XSS, SQL injection, and others, depending on how the unvalidated input is used.

Risk Severity: Critical

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Universal Input Validation: Use Laminas\InputFilter and form validation for all user-supplied data, without exception. This is a fundamental security requirement.
  • Strict Validation Rules: Define strict validation rules using Laminas\Validator classes.
  • Whitelist Approach: Prefer whitelisting allowed values over blacklisting.
  • Context-Specific Validation: Ensure validation rules are appropriate for the data type and context.
  • Server-Side Validation: Always perform validation on the server-side; client-side validation is easily bypassed.