Attack Surface: Mass Assignment Vulnerability
- Description: Attackers can modify database fields they shouldn't have access to by manipulating input data, bypassing intended restrictions within Eloquent models.
- Framework Contribution: Laravel's Eloquent ORM provides convenient methods (
create()
,update()
) that, if misused, allow mass assignment of attributes. This is a direct framework feature. - Example: An attacker adds a
role
field to a user registration form, setting it toadmin
, exploiting a model lacking proper$fillable
or$guarded
definitions. - Impact: Unauthorized data modification, privilege escalation, complete data compromise.
- Risk Severity: Critical (if sensitive data/roles are exposed) / High (otherwise).
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Strictly define
$fillable
or$guarded
: On every Eloquent model, explicitly list allowed attributes ($fillable
) or protected attributes ($guarded
). Prefer$fillable
(whitelist). - Use Form Requests: Validate and filter incoming data using Laravel's Form Request validation classes before interacting with Eloquent.
- Avoid
request()->all()
directly: Never passrequest()->all()
tocreate()
orupdate()
without prior validation and filtering. Userequest()->only([...])
.
- Strictly define
- Description: Attackers modify URL parameters to inject malicious SQL code through Eloquent queries if parameters are used directly without sanitization.
- Framework Contribution: Laravel's routing and Eloquent ORM are directly involved. While Laravel encourages safe practices, the framework allows direct use of route parameters in queries, creating the potential for misuse. This is a framework-specific risk because it relates to how Laravel handles routing and database interaction.
- Example: A route
/products/{id}
uses$product = Product::find($request->id);
without validating$request->id
. An attacker injects SQL via theid
parameter. - Impact: SQL injection, data leakage, data modification, database compromise.
- Risk Severity: High / Critical (depending on the database and data).
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Route Parameter Constraints: Use regular expressions to constrain route parameters:
Route::get('/.../{id}', ...)->where('id', '[0-9]+');
- Input Validation: Always validate and sanitize route parameters using Laravel's validation features (Form Requests are strongly recommended).
- Route Model Binding (with Caution): Use route model binding, but still validate the input. RMB provides a 404 if not found, but validation before binding is crucial.
- Avoid Raw SQL: Never use route parameters directly in raw SQL. Use Eloquent or the query builder with parameterized queries.
- Route Parameter Constraints: Use regular expressions to constrain route parameters:
Attack Surface: Unprotected Artisan Commands
- Description: Custom Artisan commands performing sensitive operations are exposed and executable by unauthorized users.
- Framework Contribution: Laravel's Artisan console is the direct source of this risk. The framework provides the command functionality, and the developer's responsibility is to secure it.
- Example: A command
php artisan create:admin
exists and can be triggered remotely without authentication. - Impact: Privilege escalation, data modification, system compromise.
- Risk Severity: Critical.
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Environment Restrictions: Limit sensitive commands to specific environments (e.g., local development) using
.env
variables and conditional logic. - Authentication/Authorization: Implement authentication and authorization checks within the command itself using Laravel's auth features if the command must be accessible in production.
- Avoid Web Exposure: Never create web routes that directly execute Artisan commands, especially sensitive ones.
- Input Validation: Validate all command input.
- Environment Restrictions: Limit sensitive commands to specific environments (e.g., local development) using
Attack Surface: Debug Mode Enabled in Production
- Description:
APP_DEBUG=true
in production reveals sensitive information (stack traces, environment variables, database credentials). - Framework Contribution: Laravel uses the
APP_DEBUG
setting in the.env
file. This is a framework-provided configuration option that, when misconfigured, creates a severe vulnerability. - Example: An application error displays a full stack trace, including database credentials, to the attacker.
- Impact: Information disclosure, complete system compromise.
- Risk Severity: Critical.
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Set
APP_DEBUG=false
: EnsureAPP_DEBUG=false
in the.env
file for all production environments. This is a non-negotiable security practice.
- Set
Attack Surface: Insecure APP_KEY
- Description: A weak, default, or compromised
APP_KEY
allows attackers to decrypt data, forge cookies, and potentially gain control. - Framework Contribution: Laravel requires and uses the
APP_KEY
for encryption and security. The framework's security model relies on the secrecy of this key. - Example: An attacker obtains the
APP_KEY
and decrypts user session data or forges cookies. - Impact: Data decryption, session hijacking, impersonation, potential code execution.
- Risk Severity: Critical.
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Generate a Strong Key: Use
php artisan key:generate
immediately after installation. - Secure Storage: Store the
APP_KEY
outside of version control, using environment variables. Never commit.env
to Git. - Regular Key Rotation: Periodically rotate the
APP_KEY
(with careful planning).
- Generate a Strong Key: Use
Attack Surface: Unsafe Query Scopes (leading to SQL Injection)
- Description: Eloquent query scopes that use user-supplied data without proper sanitization or parameterized queries can lead to SQL injection.
- Framework Contribution: Laravel's Eloquent ORM provides the query scope feature. The framework allows the creation of potentially unsafe scopes; it's the developer's responsibility to write them securely. This is a direct framework feature.
- Example: A scope
scopeSearch($query, $term)
uses$term
directly in awhereRaw
clause. - Impact: SQL injection, data leakage, data modification, database compromise.
- Risk Severity: High / Critical.
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Parameterized Queries: Always use parameterized queries or the query builder's methods (e.g.,
where()
,orWhere()
) within scopes. - Input Validation: Validate and sanitize any user-supplied data before it's used in a scope.
- Avoid Raw SQL: Minimize the use of
whereRaw
and similar methods.
- Parameterized Queries: Always use parameterized queries or the query builder's methods (e.g.,